Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Hazardous Substance Management Bureau, Pollution Control Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):623-632. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1569172. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
Limitations of the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for simulating pollutant leaching from wastes disposed of in full-scale landfills are well understood in the waste management profession; the TCLP solution has a lower pH and greater organic acid content than typical landfill leachate. The TCLP serves its intended regulatory objective, however, as long as a conservative estimate of leaching is provided. Here, we examine TCLP's ability to represent worst-case leaching conditions for monofilled municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash. A critical examination of TCLP's applicability to MSWI ash is especially relevant, as ash management at MSWI facilities often centers on passing TCLP, regardless of environmental risk posed by the ash or its recyclability. Multiple batch leaching tests were conducted on different MSWI ash streams: mixed ash, fly ash, and different size fractions of bottom ash. Batch-test results were compared with leachate simulating MSWI ash monofills. The TCLP did not consistently provide the most conservative estimate of leaching, supporting the need to consider alternative methodologies in future regulatory development.: This paper analyzes the existing hazardous waste regulatory testing requirement for municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) ash management to evaluate whether the TCLP serves its intended purpose in providing the most conservative estimate of landfilled MSWI ash. The results will serve as guidance and motivation for policy makers and the regulatory community to reevaluate the TCLP's application for characterizing MSWI ash leaching in certain disposal scenarios and could promote consideration of alternative testing procedures based upon results of this study. This study serves to promote representative and accurate quantification of leaching risk from MSWI ash.
在废物管理领域,人们充分了解毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP)在模拟大规模垃圾填埋场处置废物中污染物浸出方面的局限性;TCLP 溶液的 pH 值较低,有机酸含量较高,与典型的垃圾渗滤液相比。然而,只要提供了污染物浸出的保守估计值,TCLP 就可以达到其预期的监管目的。在这里,我们研究了 TCLP 代表单填式城市固体废物焚烧(MSWI)灰浸出的最坏情况条件的能力。对 TCLP 应用于 MSWI 灰的适用性进行严格审查尤其重要,因为 MSWI 设施中的灰渣管理通常侧重于通过 TCLP,而不论灰渣的环境风险或其可回收性如何。对不同的 MSWI 灰渣流进行了多次批量浸出试验:混合灰、飞灰和底灰的不同粒径。将批处理测试结果与模拟 MSWI 灰渣单填的浸出液进行了比较。TCLP 并未始终提供污染物浸出的最保守估计值,这支持了在未来的法规制定中需要考虑替代方法的必要性。本文分析了现有的城市固体废物焚烧炉(MSWI)灰渣管理危险废物法规测试要求,以评估 TCLP 是否在提供对填埋的 MSWI 灰渣的最保守估计方面达到了预期目的。研究结果将为决策者和监管机构提供指导和动力,重新评估 TCLP 在某些处置场景下对 MSWI 灰渣浸出的应用,并可以根据本研究的结果考虑替代测试程序。本研究旨在促进对 MSWI 灰渣浸出风险的代表性和准确量化。