• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

展示如何使用浸出环境评估框架 (LEAF) 的测试结果来制定筛选级别的浸出评估。

Demonstration of the use of test results from the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) to develop screening-level leaching assessments.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, PMB-351826, Nashville, TN 37235, United States.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, PMB-351826, Nashville, TN 37235, United States.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2021 Feb 15;121:226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.016
PMID:33383531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10468778/
Abstract

Environmental management often benefits from leaching assessment as a predictive tool for estimating constituent leaching from solid and waste materials. The Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) provides both validated tests methods for characterizing materials and a methodology for developing screening assessments based on material characterization results. The use of LEAF data in a screening-level environmental assessment approach is demonstrated through a hypothetical case study of copper/lead smelter soil remediation. The LEAF test methods characterize leaching behavior from a wide range of materials as either constituent liquid-solid partitioning as functions of pH and liquid-to-solid ratio (L/S) or as a rate of constituent mass transport. In this study, leaching characteristics of a contaminated smelter soil and the same soil treated by solidification/stabilization with Portland cement were compared to hypothetical environmental thresholds. Screening assessments were developed for total content, available content, and maximum concentrations over relevant pH domains and L/S ranges. Assessment ratios for barium, beryllium, and fluoride indicated that estimated leaching would be less than thresholds in both materials and these constituents were removed from further analysis. Similarly, chromium (in soil) and zinc (in solidified material) were screened from further analysis. For the remaining constituents, scenario-based assessment could refine estimated leaching concentrations by considering anticipated conditions of leaching scenario.

摘要

环境管理通常受益于浸出评估,因为它是一种预测工具,可以估算固体和废物材料中成分的浸出量。浸出环境评估框架(LEAF)提供了用于描述材料的经过验证的测试方法,以及一种基于材料描述结果开发筛选评估的方法。通过对铜/铅冶炼厂土壤修复的假设案例研究,展示了在筛选级环境评估方法中使用 LEAF 数据。LEAF 测试方法将各种材料的浸出行为描述为成分在 pH 和固液比(L/S)之间的液体-固体分配函数,或者作为成分质量迁移率。在本研究中,比较了污染冶炼厂土壤和用波特兰水泥固化/稳定化处理的相同土壤的浸出特性与假设的环境阈值。为总含量、有效含量和相关 pH 域和 L/S 范围内的最大浓度制定了筛选评估。钡、铍和氟化物的评估比表明,两种材料中的估计浸出量都低于阈值,这些成分已被排除在进一步分析之外。同样,铬(在土壤中)和锌(在固化材料中)也被排除在进一步分析之外。对于其余成分,可以通过考虑浸出情况的预期条件,对基于情景的评估进行改进,以估算出浸出浓度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/596ac765704a/nihms-1924899-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/bcb672c350d3/nihms-1924899-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/a91dd724580f/nihms-1924899-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/ec24f429e7ac/nihms-1924899-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/53229f3a86f5/nihms-1924899-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/806bae15fa2d/nihms-1924899-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/596ac765704a/nihms-1924899-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/bcb672c350d3/nihms-1924899-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/a91dd724580f/nihms-1924899-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/ec24f429e7ac/nihms-1924899-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/53229f3a86f5/nihms-1924899-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/806bae15fa2d/nihms-1924899-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8540/10468778/596ac765704a/nihms-1924899-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Demonstration of the use of test results from the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) to develop screening-level leaching assessments.展示如何使用浸出环境评估框架 (LEAF) 的测试结果来制定筛选级别的浸出评估。
Waste Manag. 2021 Feb 15;121:226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Methodology for scenario-based assessments and demonstration of treatment effectiveness using the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF).基于情景的评估方法和使用浸出环境评估框架(LEAF)展示治疗效果的方法。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Mar 15;406:124635. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124635. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Effect of drying-wetting cycles on leaching behavior of cement solidified lead-contaminated soil.干湿循环对水泥固化铅污染土壤淋滤行为的影响
Chemosphere. 2014 Dec;117:10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.045. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
4
Dynamic leaching behavior of geogenic As in soils after cement-based stabilization/solidification.土壤中地质成因砷在水泥基稳定/固化后的动态浸出行为。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Dec;24(36):27822-27832. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0266-x. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Environmental assessment of waste matrices contaminated with arsenic.
J Hazard Mater. 2003 Jan 31;96(2-3):229-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00215-7.
6
Effect of acid rain pH on leaching behavior of cement stabilized lead-contaminated soil.酸雨 pH 值对水泥稳定铅污染土壤浸出行为的影响。
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Apr 30;271:131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Evaluation of testing approaches for constituent leaching from electric arc furnace (EAF) slags.电弧炉(EAF)炉渣成分浸出测试方法的评估
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123892. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123892. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
8
Remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil using combined chemical leaching and reduction techniques based on hexavalent chromium speciation.基于六价铬形态的联合化学浸出和还原技术修复六价铬污染土壤。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Jan 15;208:111734. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111734. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
The importance of sulphide binding for leaching of heavy metals from contaminated Norwegian marine sediments treated by stabilization/solidification.硫化物结合对于通过稳定化/固化处理受污染的挪威海洋沉积物中重金属浸出的重要性。
Environ Technol. 2009 Jul;30(8):831-40. doi: 10.1080/09593330902990121.
10
Effect of different pHs and liquid-to-solid ratios on leaching behavior of heavy metals from landfill-mined-soil-like-fractions.不同pH值和液固比对类垃圾填埋场开采土壤组分中重金属浸出行为的影响
J Environ Manage. 2025 Mar;376:124421. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124421. Epub 2025 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of testing approaches for constituent leaching from electric arc furnace (EAF) slags.电弧炉(EAF)炉渣成分浸出测试方法的评估
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123892. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123892. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
From leaching data to release estimates: Screening and scenario assessments of electric arc furnace (EAF) slag under unencapsulated use.从浸出数据到释放量估算:未封装使用情况下电弧炉(EAF)炉渣的筛选与情景评估
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Nov 5;479:135522. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135522. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Methodology for scenario-based assessments and demonstration of treatment effectiveness using the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF).基于情景的评估方法和使用浸出环境评估框架(LEAF)展示治疗效果的方法。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Mar 15;406:124635. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124635. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Methodology for scenario-based assessments and demonstration of treatment effectiveness using the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF).基于情景的评估方法和使用浸出环境评估框架(LEAF)展示治疗效果的方法。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Mar 15;406:124635. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124635. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Assessment of the total content and leaching behavior of blends of incinerator bottom ash and natural aggregates in view of their utilization as road base construction material.评估焚烧炉底灰和天然骨料混合物的总含量和浸出行为,以将其用作道路基层建筑材料。
Waste Manag. 2019 Oct;98:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Re-evaluating the TCLP's Role as the Regulatory Driver in the Management of Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Ash.重新评估TCLP 在城市固体废物焚烧炉灰管理中的监管驱动作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 16;53(14):7964-7973. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01370. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Limitations of the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure for providing a conservative estimate of landfilled municipal solid waste incineration ash leaching.毒性特征浸出程序在提供填埋的城市固体废物焚烧灰浸出的保守估计方面的局限性。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):623-632. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1569172. Epub 2019 Mar 29.