Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 12;7(2):e13080. doi: 10.2196/13080.
Smartphone apps are a potential mechanism for development of self-management skills in people with persistent pain. However, the inclusion of best-practice content items in available pain management apps fostering core self-management skills for self-management support is not known.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the contents of smartphone apps providing information on pain management strategies for people with persistent pain facilitating self-management support and to appraise the app quality.
A systematic search was performed in the New Zealand App Store and Google Play Store. Apps were included if they were designed for people with persistent pain, provided information on pain self-management strategies, and were available in English. App contents were evaluated using an a priori 14-item self-management support (SMS-14) checklist. App quality was assessed using the 23-item Mobile Apps Rating Scale.
Of the 939 apps screened, 19 apps met the inclusion criteria. Meditation and guided relaxation were the most frequently included self-management strategies. Overall, the included apps met a median of 4 (range 1-8) of the SMS-14 checklist. A total of 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) met the largest number of items (8 out of 14) to foster self-management of pain. Self-monitoring of symptoms (n=11) and self-tailoring of strategies (n=9) were frequently featured functions, whereas a few apps had features facilitating social support and enabling communicating with clinicians. No apps provided information tailored to the cultural needs of the user. The app quality mean scores using Mobile Apps Rating Scale ranged from 2.7 to 4.5 (out of 5.0). Although use of 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) has been shown to improve health outcomes, none of the included apps have been evaluated in people with persistent pain.
Of the 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) that met the largest number of items to support skills in self-management of pain, 2 apps (PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach and SuperBetter) were free, suggesting the potential for using apps as a scalable, wide-reaching intervention to complement face-to-face care. However, none provided culturally tailored information. Although 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) were validated to show improved health outcomes, none were tested in people with persistent pain. Both users and clinicians should be aware of such limitations and make informed choices in using or recommending apps as a self-management tool. For better integration of apps in clinical practice, concerted efforts are required among app developers, clinicians, and people with persistent pain in developing apps and evaluating for clinical efficacy.
智能手机应用程序是培养持续性疼痛患者自我管理技能的一种有潜力的机制。然而,目前可用的疼痛管理应用程序中包含的最佳实践内容项目是否能促进自我管理支持所需的核心自我管理技能尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估为持续性疼痛患者提供疼痛管理策略信息以促进自我管理支持的智能手机应用程序的内容,并评价应用程序质量。
在新西兰应用商店和谷歌应用商店中进行了系统检索。如果应用程序是为持续性疼痛患者设计的,提供疼痛自我管理策略信息,并且仅提供英文版本,则将其纳入研究。使用预先制定的 14 项自我管理支持(SMS-14)检查表评估应用程序内容。使用 23 项移动应用程序评级量表评估应用程序质量。
在筛选的 939 个应用程序中,有 19 个符合纳入标准。冥想和引导放松是最常包含的自我管理策略。总体而言,纳入的应用程序满足 SMS-14 检查表中位数为 4(范围 1-8)的项目。有 3 个应用程序(Curable、PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach 和 SuperBetter)满足了促进疼痛自我管理的最大数量(14 项中的 8 项)的项目。症状自我监测(n=11)和策略自我调整(n=9)是常见的功能,而少数应用程序具有促进社会支持和启用与临床医生沟通的功能。没有应用程序提供针对用户文化需求的信息。使用移动应用程序评级量表的应用程序质量平均得分为 2.7 至 4.5(满分 5 分)。尽管已经证明使用 2 个应用程序(Headspace 和 SuperBetter)可以改善健康结果,但纳入的应用程序中没有一个在持续性疼痛患者中进行过评估。
在满足支持疼痛自我管理技能的最大数量项目的 3 个应用程序(Curable、PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach 和 SuperBetter)中,有 2 个应用程序(PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach 和 SuperBetter)是免费的,这表明将应用程序作为一种可扩展的、广泛传播的干预措施来补充面对面护理具有潜力。然而,没有一个应用程序提供了针对特定文化的信息。尽管已经证明有 2 个应用程序(Headspace 和 SuperBetter)可以改善健康结果,但没有一个应用程序在持续性疼痛患者中进行过测试。用户和临床医生都应该意识到这些局限性,并在使用或推荐应用程序作为自我管理工具时做出明智的选择。为了更好地将应用程序整合到临床实践中,应用程序开发人员、临床医生和持续性疼痛患者需要共同努力,开发应用程序并评估其临床疗效。