Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, MN, USA.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Jul 26;57(8):1192-1196. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1142.
Background Heterophile antibody (HAb) interferences in immunoassays can cause falsely elevated hCG concentrations leading to incorrect diagnosis and treatments options. When results are not consistent with the clinical findings, hCG HAb interference investigation may be requested by the physician. A retrospective evaluation of the frequency of HAb interference was performed among cases of physician-requested investigations and the effectiveness of commercially available blocking reagents to detect HAb interference in two immunoassay systems was evaluated. Methods One hundred and thirteen physician requests for hCG HAb investigation from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. The primary method used to measure hCG was the Beckman Coulter Access Total βhCG (2008-2010) and the Roche Elecsys HCG+β (2014-2017). HAb investigation included measurement by two immunoassays before and after treatment of samples with heterophile blocking reagents and serial dilution studies. Results Five cases of HAb and HAb-like interference were identified. The interference frequency was 6.7% for the Beckman assay and 2.9% for the Roche assay. The presence of HAb was detected using heterophile blocking reagents and an alternative method in three cases. The other two cases were detected due to discrepant results with an alternative method and non-linear serial dilutions (HAb-like). Conclusions HAb interference was observed in the Beckman and the Roche assays. The heterophile blocking reagents failed to detect 40% of interference cases. Blocking reagents should not solely be used for these investigations. Multiple strategies including the use of serial dilutions and using an alternative platform are critical when troubleshooting interferences in hCG immunoassays.
免疫分析中的异嗜性抗体(HAb)干扰可能导致 hCG 浓度假性升高,从而导致错误的诊断和治疗选择。当结果与临床发现不一致时,医生可能会要求进行 hCG HAb 干扰调查。对 2008 年至 2017 年间医生要求进行 hCG HAb 调查的病例进行了 HAb 干扰频率的回顾性评估,并评估了两种免疫分析系统中商业上可用的阻断试剂检测 HAb 干扰的有效性。
回顾性分析了 2008 年至 2017 年间 113 例医生要求进行 hCG HAb 调查的病例。最初用于测量 hCG 的方法是贝克曼库尔特 Access Total βhCG(2008-2010 年)和罗氏 Elecsys HCG+β(2014-2017 年)。HAb 调查包括在使用异嗜性阻断试剂处理样本前后用两种免疫分析法进行测量,以及系列稀释研究。
发现 5 例 HAb 和 HAb 样干扰。贝克曼检测法的干扰频率为 6.7%,罗氏检测法的干扰频率为 2.9%。在 3 例中,使用异嗜性阻断试剂和替代方法检测到 HAb 的存在。另外 2 例是由于与替代方法的不一致结果和非线性系列稀释(HAb 样)而被检测到。
在贝克曼和罗氏检测法中观察到 HAb 干扰。异嗜性阻断试剂未能检测到 40%的干扰病例。这些调查不应仅依赖于异嗜性阻断试剂。在 hCG 免疫分析中,当出现干扰时,需要使用包括系列稀释和替代平台在内的多种策略。