Feed Commodities International, Middlebury, VT.
Cornell Cooperative Extension of Chemung County, Elmira, NY.
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 3;97(4):1819-1827. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz050.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cinnamaldehyde, on feed intake, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, milk yield, and components in lactating dairy cows. Six lactating Holstein dairy cows (3 ruminally cannulated and 3 noncannulated) averaging 263 ± 41 d in milk (DIM) and 754 ± 45 kg of BW at the beginning of the study were used. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 19 d periods (14 d for diet adaptation and 5 d for sample collection). Treatments were 0, 2, or 4 mg/kg of BW of cinnamaldehyde. Cinnamaldehyde was mixed with 40 g of corn meal and top-dressed onto the total mixed ration (TMR). Diet was fed as a TMR and contained 37% corn silage, 18.5% mixed-mostly grass silage, 24.5% energy supplement, 16.5% protein supplement, and 3.5% vitamin and mineral mix on a DM basis. The dietary nutrient composition averaged 15.1% CP, 37.8% NDF, and 24.7% ADF. Cows were fed and milked twice daily. No differences were observed for DMI (mean = 24.6 kg/d), milk yield (mean = 28.4 kg/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM; mean = 30.6 kg/d), and 3.5% energy-corrected milk (ECM; mean = 30.7 kg/d). The dose of cinnamaldehyde did not have any effect on milk components, rumen fermentation, or pH. There were no differences in nutrient digestibility, but there was a trend for a quadratic effect for DM digestibility (P = 0.09): 74.4%, 76.3%, and 73.7% for treatments 0, 2, and 4 mg/kg of BW of cinnamaldehyde, respectively. A linear effect (P = 0.02) and a quadratic effect (P < 0.02) observed for urinary urea N and a quadratic effect (P = 0.03) for allantoin and total purine derivatives with the 2 mg/kg treatment being the lesser value. These data suggest that cinnamaldehyde at these dosages may have an antimicrobial effect in the rumen as suggested by a lesser concentration of urinary total purine derivatives. Overall, supplementing lactating dairy cows with cinnamaldehyde had no effect on feed intake, milk yield, or milk components. However, it appears that cinnamaldehyde has a negative effect on rumen microbial protein synthesis as suggested by the reduced concentration of urinary purine derivatives.
本研究旨在评估肉桂醛对泌乳奶牛采食量、瘤胃发酵、养分消化率、产奶量和乳成分的影响。6 头泌乳荷斯坦奶牛(3 头瘤胃瘘管和 3 头非瘘管),泌乳天数(DIM)平均为 263±41 天,体重(BW)为 754±45 千克,作为试验动物。奶牛采用 3×3 拉丁方设计,随机分为 3 个处理组,每个处理组有 3 个重复,每个重复有 1 头奶牛,每个重复期为 19 天(14 天适应期和 5 天采样期)。处理组分别为 0、2 或 4mg/kg BW 的肉桂醛。肉桂醛与 40g 玉米粉混合,然后撒在全混合日粮(TMR)上。试验日粮为 TMR,以干物质为基础,含有 37%的玉米青贮、18.5%的混合主要是草青贮、24.5%的能量补充料、16.5%的蛋白质补充料和 3.5%的维生素和矿物质混合物。日粮的营养成分平均为 15.1%CP、37.8%NDF 和 24.7%ADF。奶牛每天饲喂和挤奶两次。干物质采食量(平均 24.6kg/d)、产奶量(平均 28.4kg/d)、3.5%乳脂校正奶(FCM;平均 30.6kg/d)和 3.5%能量校正奶(ECM;平均 30.7kg/d)均无差异。肉桂醛的剂量对乳成分、瘤胃发酵或 pH 没有影响。养分消化率没有差异,但干物质消化率呈二次效应趋势(P=0.09):0、2 和 4mg/kg BW 肉桂醛处理组的干物质消化率分别为 74.4%、76.3%和 73.7%。尿尿素氮呈线性效应(P=0.02)和二次效应(P<0.02),尿尿酸和总嘌呤衍生物呈二次效应(P=0.03),2mg/kg 处理组的数值较低。这些数据表明,肉桂醛在这些剂量下可能在瘤胃中具有抗微生物作用,这可以从尿中总嘌呤衍生物浓度的降低得到证明。总的来说,在泌乳奶牛日粮中添加肉桂醛对采食量、产奶量或乳成分没有影响。然而,肉桂醛似乎对瘤胃微生物蛋白合成有负面影响,这可以从尿中嘌呤衍生物浓度的降低得到证明。