Alawi Seyed Arash, Limbourg Anne, Strauss Sarah, Vogt Peter M
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Plastische, Ästhetische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Replantationszentrum Niedersachsen, Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum Niedersachsen.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2019 Apr;51(2):130-138. doi: 10.1055/a-0584-7488. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Partial and full thickness burns require surgical treatment, such as early débridement and skin transplantation in MEEK/MESH technique or further reconstructive surgery. Infections of burns or transplanted areas limit surgical success and increase patient mortality. For split-thickness grafts in MEEK technique a superficial silk is applied as a protective on-top dressing, whereas in MESH technique fatty gauze and foam are used as standard protective covers over five to seven days. However, wound occlusion by both materials provides the soil for growth of microorganisms. The timely identification of impending infections is necessary to initiate early removal in order to safe and preserve skin grafts. Early identification of infections and removal of foreign material should therefore be attempted.
Burn wounds treated with split-thickness skin grafts processed by MEEK/MESH technique and covered with silk or foam overlayers were analyzed for signs of bacterial infection using the MolecuLight i:X™ device. In addition, swaps for microbiological analysis where taken from fluorescent areas and correlated with florescent image results.
We examined burn wounds (n = 14) of three different intensive care patients. The MolecuLight i:X™ camera showed a strong colonization of the transplanted areas and foreign materials, that were in line with microbiological analysis findings. The representation of the excitation load showed high values in the foreign materials. The take rate of MEEK-transplants was 90 % compared to MESH-transplanted with about 60 %. The positive predictive value was 81.8 % for detection of a wound infection with autofluorescence. The negative predictive value was 90.3 % with a sensitivity of 86.7 % and a specificity of 87.5 %.
The representation of the fluorescence exciter load shows high concentrations of pathogens both in the MEEK silk layer as well as in foam linkers. Overall split-thickness grafts according to the MEEK technique showed a higher healing rate compared to MESH technique. Screening of burns wounds with autofluorescence imaging can be helpful for an additive wound assessment. Split-thickness graft covers should be applied only for a minimum time period required to ensure stable grafting.
部分厚度和全层烧伤需要手术治疗,例如早期清创以及采用MEEK/网状植皮技术进行皮肤移植或进一步的重建手术。烧伤部位或移植区域的感染会限制手术成功率并增加患者死亡率。对于MEEK技术中的中厚皮片移植,会应用一层浅表丝绸作为保护性表层敷料,而在网状植皮技术中,脂肪纱布和泡沫在五到七天内用作标准的保护覆盖物。然而,这两种材料造成的伤口封闭为微生物生长提供了温床。及时识别即将发生的感染对于尽早采取清除措施以确保和保存皮肤移植至关重要。因此,应尝试尽早识别感染并清除异物。
使用MolecuLight i:X™设备分析采用MEEK/网状植皮技术处理并用丝绸或泡沫覆盖物覆盖的中厚皮片烧伤创面的细菌感染迹象。此外,从荧光区域采集用于微生物分析的样本,并与荧光图像结果相关联。
我们检查了三名不同重症监护患者的烧伤创面(n = 14)。MolecuLight i:X™相机显示移植区域和异物有大量细菌定植,这与微生物分析结果一致。激发负荷的表现显示异物中的值较高。MEEK移植的成活率为90%,而网状移植的成活率约为60%。自体荧光检测伤口感染的阳性预测值为81.8%。阴性预测值为90.3%,敏感性为86.7%,特异性为87.5%。
荧光激发负荷的表现显示MEEK丝绸层和泡沫连接物中均有高浓度病原体。总体而言,与网状植皮技术相比,采用MEEK技术的中厚皮片移植显示出更高的愈合率。利用自体荧光成像筛查烧伤创面有助于进行额外的伤口评估。中厚皮片覆盖物应仅在确保移植稳定所需的最短时间内使用。