• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环磷酰胺与他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。

A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Yan-Chun, Huang Jing, Li Xin, Zhao Su-Mei

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Nephrology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008
PMID:30755327
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), which is considered one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adult patients, is frequently managed with immunosuppressive agents. Both tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) are recommended as immunosuppressive agents in the management of IMN. However, profound effects and moderate evidence on the two drugs remains poorly defined at this period. The meta-analysis aims to summarize current best evidence on the efficacy as well as safety of TAC and CTX among IMN patients.

METHODS

We searched the publications on comparison of the safety and efficacy of TAC versus CTX for IMN up to April 2018. After rigorous reviewing on the quality, the data was extracted from eligible trials. All trials analyzed the summary hazard ratios (HRs) of the endpoints of interest.

RESULTS

Moderate-strong evidence indicated that tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide had comparable effects on remission rate (either CR or PR) (p>0.05). No significant differences were found in the following parameters: the rates of diarrhea, glucose intolerance (or diabetes mellitus), gastrointestinal syndrome, as well as hypertension because of adverse effects (p>0.05). However, patients with TAC therapy had a higher chance to develop urinary tract infection (p=0.010) and tremor (p=0.006). Additionally, remarkably higher risk existed in leukopenia among the CTX group as compared with the TAC group (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis presents a comprehensive assessment of current available evidence for the therapy of IMN, indicating a comparable remission rate with both TAC and CTX, while the long-term effects are needed for further verification. Nevertheless, different adverse effect profiles of two groups need careful consideration. Remarkably higher rates of urinary tract infection and tremor were observed among TAC group, while higher risk of leukopenia was found among CTX group. Further research into the treatment efficacy of both drugs is warranted to confirm the present conclusions.

摘要

背景与目的

特发性膜性肾病(IMN)被认为是成年患者肾病综合征最常见的病因之一,常采用免疫抑制剂进行治疗。他克莫司(TAC)和环磷酰胺(CTX)均被推荐作为IMN治疗中的免疫抑制剂。然而,在此期间,这两种药物的显著疗效和适度证据仍不明确。本荟萃分析旨在总结目前关于TAC和CTX在IMN患者中的疗效及安全性的最佳证据。

方法

我们检索了截至2018年4月关于TAC与CTX治疗IMN的安全性和疗效比较的出版物。在对质量进行严格审查后,从符合条件的试验中提取数据。所有试验均分析了感兴趣终点的汇总风险比(HRs)。

结果

中到强的证据表明,他克莫司和环磷酰胺在缓解率(完全缓解或部分缓解)方面具有相似的效果(p>0.05)。在以下参数方面未发现显著差异:腹泻率、葡萄糖不耐受(或糖尿病)、胃肠道综合征以及因不良反应导致的高血压(p>0.05)。然而,接受TAC治疗的患者发生尿路感染(p=0.010)和震颤(p=0.006)的几率更高。此外,与TAC组相比,CTX组白细胞减少的风险显著更高(p=0.03)。

结论

本荟萃分析对目前IMN治疗的现有证据进行了全面评估,表明TAC和CTX的缓解率相当,但其长期效果仍需进一步验证。然而,两组不同的不良反应情况需要仔细考虑。TAC组观察到的尿路感染和震颤发生率显著更高,而CTX组白细胞减少的风险更高。有必要对这两种药物的治疗效果进行进一步研究以证实目前的结论。

相似文献

1
A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.环磷酰胺与他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
2
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs cyclophosphamide in the therapy of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病患者的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Jul 3;13:2179-2186. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S209211. eCollection 2019.
3
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.他克莫司单药治疗与环磷酰胺 - 皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026628.
4
Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and treated with steroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗激素治疗的特发性膜性肾病患者的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):840-850. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1914655.
5
The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy in adult-onset nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy.他克莫司单药治疗特发性膜性肾病所致成人肾病综合征的疗效与安全性。
Ren Fail. 2017 Nov;39(1):512-518. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1325371.
6
Comparative efficacy of three regimens (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide) combined with steroids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.三种方案(环孢素、他克莫司和环磷酰胺)联合类固醇治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2022 Nov-Dec;42(6):671-679. doi: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids versus Modified Ponticelli regimen in treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: Randomized control trial.他克莫司联合皮质类固醇与改良庞蒂切利方案治疗特发性膜性肾病的随机对照试验
Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Feb;21(2):139-46. doi: 10.1111/nep.12569.
8
Comparative efficacy of 13 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 13 种免疫抑制剂治疗成人肾病综合征特发性膜性肾病的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030919.
9
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs. cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis of Chinese adults.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效及安全性:一项针对中国成年人的荟萃分析
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015 Oct;35(5):623-628. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1480-8. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.特发性膜性肾病免疫抑制治疗的比较有效性和耐受性:一项网状Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184398. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Serious Infection Rates Among Patients with Select Autoimmune Conditions: A Claims-Based Retrospective Cohort Study from Taiwan and the USA.特定自身免疫性疾病患者的严重感染率:一项基于索赔数据的台湾和美国回顾性队列研究
Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Apr;10(2):387-404. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00525-x. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
2
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.他克莫司单药治疗与他克莫司-皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28225. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028225.
3
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.
他克莫司单药治疗与环磷酰胺 - 皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026628.