• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

他克莫司单药治疗与环磷酰胺 - 皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gong Lifeng, Xu Min, Xu Wei, Tang Weigang, Lu Jingkui, Jiang Wei, Xie Fengyan, Ding Liping, Qian Xiaoli

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Nephrology, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026628.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000026628
PMID:34260552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8284768/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide (CTX)-corticosteroid combination therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients.

METHODS

Databases including the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to October 20, 2020. Eligible studies comparing TAC monotherapy and CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy in IMN patients were included. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. One randomized controlled trial and eight cohort studies involving 442 patients were identified. Compared with CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy for IMN, TAC monotherapy had higher complete remission (CR) at month 6 (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-3.50, P < .01). The 2 therapeutic regimens had similar partial remission (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.04, P = .08), total remission (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.85-2.23, P = 0.19) at month 6, and similar CR (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.84-3.19, P = .15), partial remission (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.37-1.38, P = 0.31), and total remission (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.55-3.01, P = .56) after 1 year. The relapse rate of the TAC group was higher than that of the CTX group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.75-4.53, P = .18). There was no difference between the 2 therapeutic regimens concerning glucose intolerance (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.61-2.14, P = .67), acute renal failure (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.39-3.33, P = .81), or tremors (OR 4.39, 95% CI 0.75-25.67, P = .10). Incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.79, P = .02), infection (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.39, P < 0.01), leukopenia (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.51, P < .01), and abnormal aminotransferase (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.77, P = .01) in the TAC group were all lower than those in the CTX group. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the TAC group and the CTX combined with corticosteroid 0.8 to 1 mg/kg/day group concerning CR at month 6 (P > .05). There was no significant difference between the TAC group and the CTX combined with corticosteroid 0.5 mg/kg/day group concerning abnormal aminotransferase (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

TAC monotherapy is comparable to CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy for renal remission in IMN patients. TAC monotherapy had a higher CR in the early stage and had fewer drug-related adverse effects. The relapse rate of TAC monotherapy was higher than that of CTX-corticosteroid combination therapy, but the difference was not significant.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析的目的是比较他克莫司(TAC)单药治疗与环磷酰胺(CTX)-糖皮质激素联合治疗对特发性膜性肾病(IMN)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网和万方数据库在内的数据库,检索时间从建库至2020年10月20日。纳入比较TAC单药治疗与CTX-糖皮质激素联合治疗IMN患者的符合条件的研究。使用Review Manager 5.3版进行数据分析。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了9项研究。确定了1项随机对照试验和8项队列研究,涉及442例患者。与CTX-糖皮质激素联合治疗IMN相比,TAC单药治疗在第6个月时完全缓解(CR)率更高(比值比[OR]2.18,95%置信区间[CI]1.35 - 3.50,P<0.01)。两种治疗方案在第6个月时部分缓解率(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.45 - 1.04,P = 0.08)、总缓解率(OR 1.38,95%CI 0.85 - 2.23,P = 0.19)相似,在1年后CR(OR 1.64,95%CI 0.84 - 3.19,P = 0.15)、部分缓解率(OR 0.71,95%CI 0.37 - 1.38,P = 0.31)和总缓解率(OR 1.29,95%CI 0.55 - 3.01,P = 0.56)也相似。TAC组的复发率高于CTX组,但差异无统计学意义(OR 1.85,95%CI 0.75 - 4.53,P = 0.18)。两种治疗方案在糖耐量异常(OR 1.15,95%CI 0.61 - 2.14,P = 0.67)、急性肾衰竭(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.39 - 3.33,P = 0.81)或震颤(OR 4.39,95%CI 0.75 - 25.67,P = 0.10)方面无差异。TAC组胃肠道症状(OR 0.29,95%CI 0.10 - 0.79,P = 0.02)、感染(OR 0.18,95%CI 0.08 - 0.39,P<0.01)、白细胞减少(OR 0.14,95%CI 0.04 - 0.51,P<0.01)和转氨酶异常(OR 0.31,95%CI 0.13 - 0.77,P = 0.01)的发生率均低于CTX组。亚组分析显示,TAC组与CTX联合糖皮质激素0.8至1mg/kg/天组在第6个月时CR方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。TAC组与CTX联合糖皮质激素0.5mg/kg/天组在转氨酶异常方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

TAC单药治疗与CTX-糖皮质激素联合治疗对IMN患者的肾脏缓解效果相当。TAC单药治疗在早期CR率更高,且药物相关不良反应更少。TAC单药治疗的复发率高于CTX-糖皮质激素联合治疗,但差异不显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/c46527b90900/medi-100-e26628-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/00aa8f9c2377/medi-100-e26628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/096c470e6d73/medi-100-e26628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/4fbc705c4e2e/medi-100-e26628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/5923411d6710/medi-100-e26628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/1e139a0ffcc3/medi-100-e26628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/80f546d6c2cf/medi-100-e26628-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/e507f4ccd5d3/medi-100-e26628-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/6f9312e7cc4a/medi-100-e26628-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/1bc2e7664e33/medi-100-e26628-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/afe9cb59a81e/medi-100-e26628-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/0feabbc196ab/medi-100-e26628-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/e3cbaa358dae/medi-100-e26628-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/87e2beada172/medi-100-e26628-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/cb26160e8800/medi-100-e26628-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/c46527b90900/medi-100-e26628-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/00aa8f9c2377/medi-100-e26628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/096c470e6d73/medi-100-e26628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/4fbc705c4e2e/medi-100-e26628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/5923411d6710/medi-100-e26628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/1e139a0ffcc3/medi-100-e26628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/80f546d6c2cf/medi-100-e26628-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/e507f4ccd5d3/medi-100-e26628-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/6f9312e7cc4a/medi-100-e26628-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/1bc2e7664e33/medi-100-e26628-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/afe9cb59a81e/medi-100-e26628-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/0feabbc196ab/medi-100-e26628-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/e3cbaa358dae/medi-100-e26628-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/87e2beada172/medi-100-e26628-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/cb26160e8800/medi-100-e26628-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad1/8284768/c46527b90900/medi-100-e26628-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.他克莫司单药治疗与环磷酰胺 - 皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026628.
2
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.他克莫司单药治疗与他克莫司-皮质类固醇联合治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28225. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028225.
3
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs cyclophosphamide in the therapy of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病患者的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Jul 3;13:2179-2186. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S209211. eCollection 2019.
4
Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and treated with steroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗激素治疗的特发性膜性肾病患者的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):840-850. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1914655.
5
A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.环磷酰胺与他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Effect of tacrolimus in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(14):2693-9.
7
Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids versus Modified Ponticelli regimen in treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: Randomized control trial.他克莫司联合皮质类固醇与改良庞蒂切利方案治疗特发性膜性肾病的随机对照试验
Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Feb;21(2):139-46. doi: 10.1111/nep.12569.
8
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司联合皮质类固醇治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;54(10):2555-2566. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03169-6. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis.特发性膜性肾病免疫抑制治疗的比较有效性和耐受性:一项网状Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184398. eCollection 2017.
10
Calcineurin inhibitors versus cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials.钙调磷酸酶抑制剂与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病的比较:21 项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Feb;16(2):136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of early predictors of clinical remission in primary membranous nephropathy: a analysis of the STARMEN trial.原发性膜性肾病临床缓解的早期预测因素识别:STARMEN试验分析
Clin Kidney J. 2025 Aug 13;18(9):sfaf256. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf256. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Efficacy of tacrolimus monotherapy in primary membranous nephropathy.他克莫司单药治疗原发性膜性肾病的疗效
Open Med (Wars). 2024 May 28;19(1):20240957. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-0957. eCollection 2024.
3
Novel Treatments Paradigms: Membranous Nephropathy.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs cyclophosphamide in the therapy of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗特发性膜性肾病患者的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Jul 3;13:2179-2186. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S209211. eCollection 2019.
2
A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.环磷酰胺与他克莫司治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;39(3):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.10.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
3
The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy in adult-onset nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy.
新型治疗模式:膜性肾病
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Jan 2;8(3):419-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.12.011. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Efficacy of low or heavy rituximab‑based protocols and comparison with seven regimens in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.低剂量与高剂量利妥昔单抗方案治疗特发性膜性肾病的疗效及其与七种方案的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Mar;55(3):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03372-5. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
5
Idiopathic membranous nephropathy in children: A case report.儿童特发性膜性肾病:一例报告。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 6;10(16):5387-5393. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5387.
6
Recent Clinical Trials Insights into the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy.近期原发性膜性肾病治疗的临床试验观察
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):109-132. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01656-1. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
他克莫司单药治疗特发性膜性肾病所致成人肾病综合征的疗效与安全性。
Ren Fail. 2017 Nov;39(1):512-518. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1325371.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclophosphamide for Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗原发性膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2017 Feb;77(2):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0683-z.
5
2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group.2015年Cochrane背部和颈部组系统评价方法更新指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov;40(21):1660-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061.
6
Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy.第7章:特发性膜性肾病。
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012 Jun;2(2):186-197. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.20.
7
Cancer risk after cyclophosphamide treatment in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.特发性膜性肾病 cyclophosphamide 治疗后的癌症风险。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):1066-73. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08880813. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表在荟萃分析中评估非随机研究质量的批判性评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;25(9):603-5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
9
The pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 50-year odyssey.特发性膜性肾病的发病机制:50 年的探索历程。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jul;56(1):157-67. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a clinicopathologic study with respect to immunoglobulin G4.腹膜后纤维化:一项关于免疫球蛋白G4的临床病理研究
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Dec;33(12):1833-9. doi: 10.1097/pas.0b013e3181b72882.