U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
FOCUS 1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Vaccine. 2019 Mar 7;37(11):1495-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
Experimental Ebola vaccines were introduced during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Planning for the Sierra Leone Trial to Introduce a Vaccine against Ebola (STRIVE) was underway in late 2014. We examined hypothetical acceptability and perceptions of experimental Ebola vaccines among health care workers (HCWs), frontline workers, and the general public to guide ethical communication of risks and benefits of any experimental Ebola vaccine.
Between December 2014 and January 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews with public health leaders (N = 31), focus groups with HCWs and frontline workers (N = 20), and focus groups with members of the general public (N = 15) in Western Area Urban, Western Area Rural, Port Loko, Bombali, and Tonkolili districts. Themes were identified using qualitative content analysis.
Across all participant groups, not knowing the immediate and long-term effects of an experimental Ebola vaccine was the most serious concern. Some respondents feared that experimental vaccines may cause Ebola, lead to death, or result in other adverse events. Among HCWs, not knowing the level of protection provided by experimental Ebola vaccines was another concern. HCWs and frontline workers were motivated to help find a vaccine for Ebola to help end the outbreak. General public participants cited positive experiences with routine childhood immunization in Sierra Leone.
Our formative assessment prior to STRIVE's implementation in Sierra Leone helped identify concerns, motivations, and information gaps among potential participants of an experimental Ebola vaccine trial, at the time when an unprecedented outbreak was occurring in the country. The findings from this assessment were incorporated early in the process to guide ethical communication of risks and benefits when discussing informed consent for possible participation in the vaccine trial that was launched later in 2015.
在 2014-2015 年西非埃博拉疫情期间,引入了实验性埃博拉疫苗。塞拉利昂引入埃博拉疫苗试验(STRIVE)的计划于 2014 年末进行。我们研究了卫生保健工作者(HCWs)、一线工作人员和普通公众对实验性埃博拉疫苗的假设可接受性和看法,以指导任何实验性埃博拉疫苗的风险和收益的伦理沟通。
2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 1 月期间,我们对西部地区城市、西部地区农村、博城、邦巴里和通科利利地区的公共卫生领导人(N=31)进行了深入访谈,对 HCWs 和一线工作人员(N=20)和普通公众(N=15)进行了焦点小组讨论。使用定性内容分析确定主题。
在所有参与者群体中,不知道实验性埃博拉疫苗的即时和长期效果是最严重的担忧。一些受访者担心实验疫苗可能会引起埃博拉、导致死亡或导致其他不良事件。在 HCWs 中,不知道实验性埃博拉疫苗提供的保护水平是另一个担忧。HCWs 和一线工作人员有动力帮助寻找埃博拉疫苗,以帮助结束疫情。普通公众参与者提到了塞拉利昂常规儿童免疫接种的积极经验。
在 STRIVE 在塞拉利昂实施之前进行的这项形成性评估有助于确定潜在参与者对实验性埃博拉疫苗试验的关注、动机和信息差距,当时该国正发生前所未有的疫情。在讨论可能参与稍后于 2015 年推出的疫苗试验的知情同意时,该评估的结果被早期纳入,以指导风险和收益的伦理沟通。