Maebayashi Toshiya, Ishibashi Naoya, Aizawa Takuya, Sakaguchi Masakuni, Saito Tsutomu, Kawamori Jiro, Tanaka Yoshiaki, Hirotani Yukari, Homma Taku
Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi Kami-cho, Itabashi-ku, 173-8610, Tokyo, Japan.
Radiology Clinic, Sonoda Medical Hospital, Adachi-ku, 121-0064, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;276(4):1221-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05338-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Treatment guidelines have not been established for unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). For these patients, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can provide a better prognosis than that for patients with other head and neck cancers. The presence of HPV in the tumor is associated with a better outcome. However, not all patients with HPV-positive unknown primary head and neck SCC experience good treatment outcomes in actual clinical settings.
We thus retrospectively determined the Ki-67 proliferation index and p16 expression status to assess the associations of these parameters with treatment outcomes of patients with unknown primary head and neck SCC.
The subjects were 13 patients who underwent CRT after surgery or excision biopsy between 1999 and 2016. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 76.9% and 68.4%, respectively. The prognostic factor was age. There was no significant difference in survival between patients with a high Ki-67 vs. low Ki-67 or between patients with p16-positive vs. p16-negative metastases OS. However, all p16-positive patients with low Ki-67 showed good locoregional control.
The combination of ki67 expression and p16 expression status may allow prediction of local control more accurately than p16 expression status alone.
对于原发灶不明的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC),尚未制定治疗指南。对于这些患者,放化疗(CRT)比其他头颈部癌症患者的预后更好。肿瘤中HPV的存在与较好的预后相关。然而,在实际临床环境中,并非所有HPV阳性的原发灶不明的头颈部SCC患者都能获得良好的治疗效果。
因此,我们回顾性地测定了Ki-67增殖指数和p16表达状态,以评估这些参数与原发灶不明的头颈部SCC患者治疗效果的相关性。
研究对象为1999年至2016年间接受手术或切除活检后进行CRT的13例患者。2年和5年总生存率(OS)分别为76.9%和68.4%。预后因素为年龄。Ki-67高表达与低表达患者之间或p16阳性与p16阴性转移患者的OS之间在生存率上无显著差异。然而,所有Ki-67低表达的p16阳性患者均显示出良好的局部区域控制。
与单独的p16表达状态相比,Ki-67表达和p16表达状态的联合可能更准确地预测局部控制情况。