• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化丹佛标准可提高钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的检测率,筛查显示后续缺血性卒中风险显著增加。

Augmenting Denver criteria yields increased BCVI detection, with screening showing markedly increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Bensch Frank V, Varjonen Elina A, Pyhältö Tuomo T, Koskinen Seppo K

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Töölö Trauma Center, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, Topeliuksenkatu 5, P.O. Box 266, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Töölö Trauma Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01677-0. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10140-019-01677-0
PMID:30756247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6647420/
Abstract

PURPOSE

BCVI may lead to ischemic stroke, disability, and death, while being often initially clinically silent. Screening criteria for BCVI based on clinical findings and trauma mechanism have improved detection, with Denver criteria being most common. Up to 30% of patients do not meet BCVI screening criteria. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of augmented Denver criteria on detection, and to determine the relative risk for ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Denver screening criteria were augmented by any high-energy trauma of the cervical spine, thorax, abdomen, or pelvis. All acute blunt trauma WBCT including CT angiography (CTA) over a period of 38 months were reviewed retrospectively by two Fellowship-trained radiologists, as well as any cerebral imaging after the initial trauma.

RESULTS

1544 WBCT studies included 374 CTA (m/f = 271/103; mean age 41.5 years). Most common mechanisms of injury were MVA (51.5%) and fall from a height (22.3%). We found 72 BCVI in 56 patients (15.0%), with 13 (23.2%) multiple lesions. The ICA was affected in 49 (68.1%) and the vertebral artery in 23 (31.9%) of cases. The most common injury level was C2, with Biffl grades I and II most common in ICA, and II and IV in VA. Interobserver agreement was substantial (Kappa = 0.674). Of 215 patients imaged, 16.1% with BCVI and 1.9% of the remaining cases had cerebral ischemic stroke (p < .0001; OR = 9.77; 95% CI 3.3-28.7). Eleven percent of patients with BCVI would not have met standard screening criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in detection rate for BCVI justifies more liberal screening protocols.

摘要

目的

钝性颈椎椎动脉损伤(BCVI)可能导致缺血性中风、残疾和死亡,而其在临床上最初往往没有症状。基于临床发现和创伤机制的BCVI筛查标准提高了检出率,其中丹佛标准最为常用。高达30%的患者不符合BCVI筛查标准。本研究的目的是分析强化丹佛标准对检测的影响,并确定缺血性中风的相对风险。

方法

丹佛筛查标准通过任何颈椎、胸部、腹部或骨盆的高能创伤进行强化。两名经过专科培训的放射科医生对38个月期间所有包括CT血管造影(CTA)的急性钝性创伤全身CT(WBCT)进行回顾性分析,并对初始创伤后的任何脑部影像进行分析。

结果

1544项WBCT研究包括374项CTA(男/女=271/103;平均年龄41.5岁)。最常见的损伤机制是机动车事故(MVA,51.5%)和高处坠落(22.3%)。我们在56例患者中发现了72处BCVI(15.0%),其中13例(23.2%)为多发损伤。49例(68.1%)累及颈内动脉(ICA),23例(31.9%)累及椎动脉。最常见的损伤水平是C2,ICA损伤中Biffl I级和II级最常见,椎动脉损伤中II级和IV级最常见。观察者间一致性良好(Kappa=0.674)。在215例进行成像的患者中,BCVI患者中有16.1%发生脑缺血性中风,其余患者中有1.9%发生脑缺血性中风(p<0.0001;OR=9.77;95%CI 3.3-28.7)。11%的BCVI患者不符合标准筛查标准。

结论

BCVI检出率的提高证明了更宽松的筛查方案是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/2bc753f65d34/10140_2019_1677_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/7af1a7a6cf53/10140_2019_1677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/20f07af73658/10140_2019_1677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/5f8a88db5ced/10140_2019_1677_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/0baf993c2782/10140_2019_1677_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/92175a7dd677/10140_2019_1677_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/2bc753f65d34/10140_2019_1677_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/7af1a7a6cf53/10140_2019_1677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/20f07af73658/10140_2019_1677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/5f8a88db5ced/10140_2019_1677_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/0baf993c2782/10140_2019_1677_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/92175a7dd677/10140_2019_1677_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f946/6647420/2bc753f65d34/10140_2019_1677_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Augmenting Denver criteria yields increased BCVI detection, with screening showing markedly increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke.强化丹佛标准可提高钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的检测率,筛查显示后续缺血性卒中风险显著增加。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01677-0. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
Clinical utility of a screening protocol for blunt cerebrovascular injury using computed tomography angiography.使用计算机断层血管造影术筛查钝性脑血管损伤的临床应用。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151545. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
3
Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography.钝性脑血管损伤的初始筛查试验:全身计算机断层扫描的有效性评估
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury.多排螺旋 CT 血管造影诊断钝性脑血管损伤的局限性。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1642-1647. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS163264. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Missed blunt cerebrovascular injuries using current screening criteria - The time for liberalized screening is now.采用现行筛查标准时漏诊的钝性脑血管损伤——现在是放宽筛查的时候了。
Injury. 2023 May;54(5):1342-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.019. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Risk factors for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury diagnosed by computed tomography angiography in the pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study.计算机断层血管造影诊断儿童创伤性钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jun;15(6):599-606. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14397. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: the McGovern screening score.小儿钝性脑血管损伤:麦戈文筛查评分
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):639-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.PEDS17498. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Association between cervical fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injury when screened with computed tomographic angiography.颈椎骨折类型与计算机断层血管造影筛查出的钝性脑血管损伤之间的相关性。
Spine J. 2024 Feb;24(2):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: incidence and long-term follow-up.钝性脑血管损伤:发生率及长期随访。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):161-170. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01171-9. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries in pediatric trauma patients.筛查儿童创伤患者的钝性脑血管损伤。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Sep;54(9):1861-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Traumatic Vertebral Artery Injury: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Key Considerations for Management.创伤性椎动脉损伤:诊断、自然病程及管理的关键考量因素
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3159. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093159.
2
A bibliometric analysis of blunt cerebrovascular injury: the top 50 most instrumental articles.钝性脑血管损伤的文献计量分析:最具影响力的50篇文章
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 28;48(1):336. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03487-0.
3
The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.

本文引用的文献

1
Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI).钝性脑血管损伤 (BCVI) 的最佳实践指南。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0559-1.
2
Blunt traumatic vascular injuries of the head and neck in the ED.急诊科中头颈部钝性创伤性血管损伤
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1630-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
3
Blunt cerebrovascular injury incidence, stroke-rate, and mortality with the expanded Denver criteria.应用扩展后的丹佛标准后,钝性脑血管损伤的发生率、卒中发生率和死亡率。
Willis 环解剖结构和扫描实践对钝性脑血管损伤结果的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 17;32(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01225-x.
4
Vertebral Artery Dissection.椎动脉夹层
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Jan 9;17(1):e255923. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-255923.
5
Changes in occurrence and management of laryngeal fractures at the Helsinki University Hospital during 25 years.25 年间赫尔辛基大学医院喉骨折发生率和处理方法的变化。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08298-x. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
6
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Are We Overscreening Low-Mechanism Trauma?钝性脑血管损伤:我们是否过度筛查低机制创伤?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1296-1301. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8004. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Emergent neurovascular imaging in patients with blunt traumatic injuries.钝性创伤患者的急诊神经血管成像
Front Radiol. 2022 Sep 15;2:1001114. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2022.1001114. eCollection 2022.
8
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in the Elderly With Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries: Results of a Retrospective Multi-Center Study of 1512 Cases in Japan.日本一项回顾性多中心研究:1512 例创伤性颈椎损伤老年患者的钝性脑血管损伤结果。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jun;40(11-12):1164-1172. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0180. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
9
Routine CTA screening identifies blunt cerebrovascular injuries missed by clinical risk factors.常规CT血管造影筛查可发现临床危险因素遗漏的钝性脑血管损伤。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Aug 26;7(1):e000924. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000924. eCollection 2022.
10
Delayed Blunt Traumatic Carotid Artery Dissection After a Scooter Accident: A Case Report.摩托车事故后迟发性钝性创伤性颈动脉夹层:一例报告
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2022 May;6(2):146-150. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2022.1.55058.
Surgery. 2018 Sep;164(3):494-499. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.032. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
4
Imaging and Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.钝性脑血管损伤的影像学与处理。
Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):542-563. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170140.
5
A review of split-bolus single-pass CT in the assessment of trauma patients.单次团注多层螺旋CT在创伤患者评估中的应用综述
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Aug;25(4):367-374. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1591-1. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
6
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Cervical Spine Fractures: Are More-Liberal Screening Criteria Warranted?颈椎骨折中的钝性脑血管损伤:是否需要更宽松的筛查标准?
Global Spine J. 2016 Nov;6(7):679-685. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579552. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Expanded screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: a bigger impact than anticipated.钝性脑血管损伤的扩大筛查标准:影响比预期更大。
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1167-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
Early antithrombotic therapy is safe and effective in patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury and solid organ injury or traumatic brain injury.早期抗血栓治疗对于合并钝性脑血管损伤及实体器官损伤或创伤性脑损伤的患者而言是安全有效的。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jul;81(1):173-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001058.
9
The limitations of using risk factors to screen for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: the harder you look, the more you find.
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Sep 26;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0040-7. eCollection 2015.
10
Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography.钝性脑血管损伤的初始筛查试验:全身计算机断层扫描的有效性评估
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 9.