Suppr超能文献

使用姑息性镇静治疗存在性痛苦:关于实践、伦理考量及指南的范围综述

The Use of Palliative Sedation to Treat Existential Suffering: A Scoping Review on Practices, Ethical Considerations, and Guidelines.

作者信息

Ciancio Allysa L, Mirza Raza M, Ciancio Amy A, Klinger Christopher A

机构信息

Health Studies Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute for Life Course and Aging, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;35(1):13-20. doi: 10.1177/0825859719827585. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Though palliative sedation has been recognized as an acceptable practice in Canada for many years now, there is a lack of clinical research and guidelines pertaining to its use as a treatment of existential refractory symptoms in the terminally ill.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aimed to survey the literature surrounding palliative sedation and existential suffering and to inform research, policy, and practice.

METHODS

To address the main research question: a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework was performed, spanning electronic databases of the peer reviewed and grey literature. Articles were screened for inclusion, and a thematic content analysis allowed for a summary of key findings.

RESULTS

Out of 427 search results, 71 full text articles were obtained, 20 of which were included. Out of these articles, four themes were identified as key findings. These included: (1) Ethical considerations; (2) The role of the health care provider; looking specifically at the impact on nurses; (3) The need for multidisciplinary care teams; and (4) Existential suffering's connection to religiosity and spirituality.

CONCLUSION

Palliative sedation to treat existential refractory symptoms was labelled a controversial practice. A shortage of evidence-based resources limits the current literature's ability to inform policy and clinical practice. There is a need for both qualitative and quantitative multi-center research so health care professionals and regional-level institutions have firm roots to establish proper policy and practice.

摘要

背景

尽管姑息性镇静多年来在加拿大已被视为一种可接受的做法,但缺乏关于将其用作治疗晚期患者存在性难治症状的临床研究和指南。

目的

本范围综述旨在调查有关姑息性镇静和存在性痛苦的文献,并为研究、政策和实践提供信息。

方法

为解决主要研究问题,按照阿克西和奥马利的框架进行了范围综述,涵盖同行评审和灰色文献的电子数据库。对文章进行筛选以确定是否纳入,通过主题内容分析总结关键发现。

结果

在427条搜索结果中,获得了71篇全文文章,其中20篇被纳入。在这些文章中,确定了四个主题作为关键发现。这些主题包括:(1)伦理考量;(2)医疗保健提供者的角色,特别关注对护士的影响;(3)多学科护理团队的必要性;(4)存在性痛苦与宗教信仰和精神性的联系。

结论

使用姑息性镇静治疗存在性难治症状被认为是一种有争议的做法。缺乏循证资源限制了当前文献为政策和临床实践提供信息的能力。需要进行定性和定量的多中心研究,以便医疗保健专业人员和地区级机构有坚实基础来制定适当的政策和实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验