Faculty of Medicine, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Palliative Care, Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste, Macedo de Cavaleiros, Portugal.
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;40(1):72-78. doi: 10.1177/08258597241256874. Epub 2024 May 25.
This study aimed to survey the practice of palliative sedation in Portugal, where data on this subject were lacking. This was a prospective multicentric study that included all patients admitted to each team that agreed to participate. Patients were followed until death, discharge, or after 3 months of follow-up. The study included 8 teams: 4 as palliative care units (PCU), 1 as a hospital palliative care team (HPCT), 2 as home care (HC), and 1 as HPCT and HC. Of the 361 patients enrolled, 52% were male, the median age was 76 years, and 285 (79%) had cancer. Continuous sedation was undergone by 49 (14%) patients: 26 (53%) were male, and the median age was 76. Most patients, 46 (94%), had an oncological diagnosis. Only in a minority of cases, the family, 16 (33%), or the patient, 5 (10%), participated in the decision to sedate. Delirium was the most frequent symptom leading to sedation. The medication most used was midazolam (65%). In the multivariable analysis, only age and the combined score were independently associated with sedation; patients <76 years and those with higher levels of suffering had a higher probability of being sedated. The practice of continuous palliative sedation in Portugal is within the range reported in other studies. One particularly relevant point was the low participation of patients and their families in the decision-making process. Each team must have a deep discussion on this aspect.
这项研究旨在调查葡萄牙的姑息性镇静治疗实践情况,因为在这个主题上,葡萄牙缺乏相关数据。这是一项前瞻性的多中心研究,纳入了每个同意参与的团队中的所有患者。患者的随访时间直到死亡、出院或随访 3 个月后。该研究包括 8 个团队:4 个为姑息治疗病房(PCU),1 个为医院姑息治疗团队(HPCT),2 个为家庭护理(HC),1 个为 HPCT 和 HC。在纳入的 361 名患者中,52%为男性,中位年龄为 76 岁,285 名(79%)患有癌症。49 名(14%)患者接受了持续镇静治疗:26 名(53%)为男性,中位年龄为 76 岁。大多数患者(46 名,94%)有肿瘤学诊断。只有少数情况下(16 名,33%)是家属,5 名(10%)是患者参与了镇静治疗的决策。谵妄是导致镇静的最常见症状。最常使用的药物是咪达唑仑(65%)。在多变量分析中,只有年龄和综合评分与镇静治疗独立相关;年龄<76 岁和痛苦程度较高的患者接受镇静治疗的可能性更高。葡萄牙连续姑息性镇静治疗的实践情况在其他研究报告的范围内。一个特别值得关注的问题是患者及其家属在决策过程中的参与度较低。每个团队都必须对此进行深入讨论。