Suppr超能文献

基于亲代扩展家庭设计的儿童虐待的遗传和环境病因学。

The genetic and environmental etiology of child maltreatment in a parent-based extended family design.

机构信息

Centre for Forensic Family and Youth Care Studies,Leiden University.

Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition,Leiden University,Leiden.

出版信息

Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Feb;31(1):157-172. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418001608.

Abstract

Child maltreatment has been associated with various cumulative risk factors. However, little is known about the extent to which genetic and environmental factors contribute to individual differences between parents in perpetrating child maltreatment. To estimate the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to perpetrating maltreatment we used a parent-based extended family design. Child-reported perpetrated maltreatment was available for 556 parents (283 women) from 63 families. To explore reporter effects (i.e., child perspective on maltreatment), child reports were compared to multi-informant reports. Based on polygenic model analyses, most of the variance related to the perpetration of physical abuse and emotional neglect was explained by common environmental factors (physical abuse: c2 = 59%, SE = 12%, p = .006; emotional neglect: c2 = 47%, SE = 8%, p < .001) whereas genetic factors did not significantly contribute to the model. For perpetrated emotional abuse, in contrast, genetic factors did significantly contribute to perpetrated emotional abuse (h2 = 33%, SE = 8%, p < .001), whereas common environment factors did not. Multi-informant reports led to similar estimates of genetic and common environmental effects on all measures except for emotional abuse, where a multi-informant approach yielded higher estimates of the common environmental effects. Overall, estimates of unique environment, including measurement error, were lower using multi-informant reports. In conclusion, our findings suggest that genetic pathways play a significant role in perpetrating emotional abuse, while physical abuse and emotional neglect are transmitted primarily through common environmental factors. These findings imply that interventions may need to target different mechanisms dependings on maltreatment type.

摘要

儿童虐待与各种累积风险因素有关。然而,对于遗传和环境因素在多大程度上导致父母在实施儿童虐待方面存在个体差异,人们知之甚少。为了估计遗传和环境因素对实施虐待的相对贡献,我们使用了基于父母的扩展家庭设计。63 个家庭中的 556 名父母(283 名女性)提供了儿童报告的实施虐待情况。为了探索报告者效应(即儿童对虐待的看法),将儿童报告与多信息报告进行了比较。基于多基因模型分析,与身体虐待和情感忽视的实施相关的大部分变异由共同环境因素解释(身体虐待:c2 = 59%,SE = 12%,p =.006;情感忽视:c2 = 47%,SE = 8%,p <.001),而遗传因素对模型没有显著贡献。相比之下,对于实施情感虐待,遗传因素对实施情感虐待有显著贡献(h2 = 33%,SE = 8%,p <.001),而共同环境因素没有。多信息报告导致对所有措施的遗传和共同环境效应的估计相似,除了情感虐待,其中多信息方法对共同环境效应的估计更高。总体而言,使用多信息报告时,独特环境的估计值(包括测量误差)较低。总之,我们的研究结果表明,遗传途径在实施情感虐待中起着重要作用,而身体虐待和情感忽视主要通过共同环境因素传递。这些发现意味着干预措施可能需要根据虐待类型针对不同的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验