Suppr超能文献

在初级保健和急诊护理中,用于治疗下腰痛的影像学检查有多常见?对 21 年来超过 400 万份影像学检查申请进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。

How common is imaging for low back pain in primary and emergency care? Systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4 million imaging requests across 21 years.

机构信息

Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, School of Public Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):642-651. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100087. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To (1) estimate the proportion of patients seeking care for low back pain (LBP) who are imaged and (2) explore trends in the proportion of patients who received diagnostic imaging over time. We also examined the effect of study-level factors on estimates of imaging proportion.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases from January 1995 to December 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Observational designs and controlled trials that reported imaging for patients presenting to primary care or emergency care for LBP. We assessed study quality and calculated pooled proportions by care setting and imaging type, with strength of evidence assessed using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

45 studies were included. They represented 19 451 749 consultations for LBP that had resulted in 4 343 919 imaging requests/events over 21 years. Primary care: moderate quality evidence that simple imaging proportion was 16.3% (95% CI 12.6% to 21.1%) and complex imaging was 9.2% (95% CI 6.2% to 13.5%). For any imaging, the pooled proportion was 24.8% (95% CI 19.3%to 31.1%). Emergency care: moderate quality evidence that simple imaging proportion was 26.1% (95% CI 18.2% to 35.8%) and high-quality evidence that complex imaging proportion was 8.2% (95% CI 4.4% to 15.6%). For any imaging, the pooled proportion was 35.6% (95% CI 29.8% to 41.8%). Complex imaging increased from 7.4% (95% CI 5.7% to 9.6%) for imaging requested in 1995 to 11.4% (95% CI 9.6% to 13.5%) in 2015 (relative increase of 53.5%). Between-study variability in imaging proportions was only partially explained by study-level characteristics; there were insufficient data to comment on some prespecified study-level factors.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: One in four patients who presented to primary care with LBP received imaging as did one in three who presented to the emergency department. The rate of complex imaging appears to have increased over 21 years despite guideline advice and education campaigns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016041987.

摘要

目的

(1)估计因腰痛(LBP)就诊而接受影像学检查的患者比例,(2)探讨随时间推移接受诊断性影像学检查的患者比例的变化趋势。我们还研究了研究水平因素对影像学检查比例估计的影响。

数据来源

1995 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 数据库的电子检索。

选择研究的资格标准

报告患者因 LBP 就诊于初级保健或急诊就诊而进行影像学检查的观察性设计和对照试验。我们评估了研究质量,并按护理环境和影像学类型计算了汇总比例,使用 GRADE 系统评估证据强度。

结果

共纳入 45 项研究。它们代表了 19451749 例因 LBP 就诊的患者,21 年间共提出了 4343919 例影像学检查请求/事件。初级保健:中等质量证据表明,简单影像学检查的比例为 16.3%(95%CI 12.6%至 21.1%),复杂影像学检查的比例为 9.2%(95%CI 6.2%至 13.5%)。任何影像学检查的汇总比例为 24.8%(95%CI 19.3%至 31.1%)。急诊:中等质量证据表明,简单影像学检查的比例为 26.1%(95%CI 18.2%至 35.8%),高质量证据表明复杂影像学检查的比例为 8.2%(95%CI 4.4%至 15.6%)。任何影像学检查的汇总比例为 35.6%(95%CI 29.8%至 41.8%)。复杂影像学检查从 1995 年的 7.4%(95%CI 5.7%至 9.6%)增加到 2015 年的 11.4%(95%CI 9.6%至 13.5%)(相对增加 53.5%)。影像学检查比例的研究间变异性仅部分由研究水平特征解释; 由于指南建议和教育活动,有些预定的研究水平因素的数据不足,无法进行评论。

总结/结论:四分之一因 LBP 就诊于初级保健的患者接受了影像学检查,三分之一就诊于急诊科的患者也接受了影像学检查。尽管有指南建议和教育活动,但复杂影像学检查的比例似乎在 21 年内有所增加。

临床试验注册号

CRD42016041987。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验