• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估预测上消化道出血(UGIB)患者临床结局的三种评分系统的数据集 - 伊朗阿瓦士

Dataset for evaluation of threescoring systems for forecasting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - Ahvaz, Iran.

作者信息

Saeidseyedian Seyed, Shayesteh Ali Akbar, Beyranvandi Fereshteh

机构信息

Alimentary Tract Research Center, Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center for Infectious Diseases of Digestive System, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2018 Oct 12;21:2526-2530. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.029. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.029
PMID:30761334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6288395/
Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) which occurs proximal to the Treitz ligament is one of the most common cases is emergency medical conditions. The aim of this data article is to evaluation of Rockall and Blatchford scoring systems for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Imam-Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran. This dataset was collected by retrospective descriptive epidemiologic survey which 350 non-cirrhotic patients with UGIB who referred to Ahwaz Imam-Khomeini Hospital for six months. According to the obtained data, in both clinical Rockall and complete Rockall systems, the need for re-endoscopy and the risk of re-bleeding in patients with high scores was more compared to patients with low scores. While, the obtained data about Blatchford score for re-endoscopy and re-bleeding risk was showed which no significant difference. Based on to present dataset, the Rockall systems was superior to Blatchford systems in predicting the re-bleeding as well as the need for re-endoscopy while, none of the systems were efficient in terms of predicting the need for urgent endoscopy and surgery.

摘要

发生在屈氏韧带近端的上消化道出血(UGIB)是急诊医疗中最常见的病例之一。本数据文章的目的是评估罗卡尔(Rockall)和布拉奇福德(Blatchford)评分系统对伊朗阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院上消化道出血患者临床结局的预测能力。该数据集通过回顾性描述性流行病学调查收集,研究对象为350例非肝硬化性上消化道出血患者,他们在六个月内转诊至阿瓦士伊玛目霍梅尼医院。根据所得数据,在临床罗卡尔系统和完整罗卡尔系统中,高分患者再次内镜检查的需求和再出血风险均高于低分患者。而关于布拉奇福德评分与再次内镜检查及再出血风险的数据显示,二者无显著差异。基于当前数据集,罗卡尔系统在预测再出血以及再次内镜检查需求方面优于布拉奇福德系统,然而,在预测紧急内镜检查和手术需求方面,这两种系统均无效。

相似文献

1
Dataset for evaluation of threescoring systems for forecasting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) - Ahvaz, Iran.用于评估预测上消化道出血(UGIB)患者临床结局的三种评分系统的数据集 - 伊朗阿瓦士
Data Brief. 2018 Oct 12;21:2526-2530. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.029. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.
3
Pillcam ESO(®) is more accurate than clinical scoring systems in risk stratifying emergency room patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Pillcam ESO(®) 在风险分层急性上消化道出血的急诊科患者方面比临床评分系统更准确。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013 May;6(3):193-8. doi: 10.1177/1756283X13481020.
4
Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Blatchford 评分是一种预测上消化道出血癌症患者是否需要干预的有用工具。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;28(8):1288-94. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12179.
5
Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.急性上消化道出血的风险分层:AIMS65 评分与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德和罗克洛评分系统的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.非静脉曲张性和静脉曲张性上消化道出血中三种风险评分系统的前瞻性比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;31(4):761-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13222.
7
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较:国际多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.
8
Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.三种预测上消化道出血预后的风险评分比较:用白蛋白修正格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分
Rom J Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;57(4):322-333. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0016.
9
Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.两种评分系统对台湾人群非静脉曲张性上消化道出血预后预测的比较
J Acute Med. 2017 Sep 1;7(3):115-121. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.2017.0703.004.
10
Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.老年急性上消化道出血患者风险分层的三种评分系统比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Apr;17(4):575-583. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12757. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors associated with implant sites prepared by orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.正畸治疗所制备种植部位的相关危险因素:一项系统综述
Eur J Transl Myol. 2023 Nov 21;33(4):11727. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2023.11727.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.比较风险评分系统在预测上消化道出血患者在急诊单元的临床结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
2
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.