• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者利益相关者参与研究:描述基础原则和最佳实践活动的叙述性综述。

Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12873
PMID:30761699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6543160/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health research is evolving to include patient stakeholders (patients, families and caregivers) as active members of research teams. Frameworks describing the conceptual foundations underlying this engagement and strategies detailing best practice activities to facilitate engagement have been published to guide these efforts.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this narrative review are to identify, quantify and summarize (a) the conceptual foundational principles of patient stakeholder engagement in research and (b) best practice activities to support these efforts. SEARCH STRATEGY, INCLUSION CRITERIA, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We accessed a publicly available repository of systematically identified literature related to patient engagement in research. Two reviewers independently screened articles to identify relevant articles and abstracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 990 potentially relevant articles of which 935 (94.4%) were excluded and 55 (5.6%) relevant. The most commonly reported foundational principles were "respect" (n = 25, 45%) and "equitable power between all team members" (n = 21, 38%). Creating "trust between patient stakeholders and researchers" was described in 17 (31%) articles. Twenty-seven (49%) articles emphasized the importance of providing training and education for both patient stakeholder and researchers. Providing financial compensation for patient stakeholders' time and expertise was noted in 19 (35%) articles. Twenty articles (36%) emphasized regular, bidirectional dialogue between patient partners and researchers as important for successful engagement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Engaging patient stakeholders in research as partners presents an opportunity to design, implement and disseminate patient-centred research. This review creates an overarching foundational framework for authentic and sustainable partnerships between patient stakeholders and researchers.

摘要

背景

健康研究正在发展,将患者利益相关者(患者、家属和照护者)纳入研究团队,作为积极成员。已经发布了描述这种参与的概念基础的框架以及详细说明促进参与的最佳实践活动的策略,以指导这些努力。

目的

本叙述性综述的目的是确定、量化和总结(a)患者利益相关者参与研究的概念基础原则,以及(b)支持这些努力的最佳实践活动。

检索策略、纳入标准、数据提取和综合:我们访问了一个公开的、系统地确定与患者参与研究相关文献的存储库。两名审查员独立筛选文章,以确定相关文章并提取数据。

主要结果

我们确定了 990 篇可能相关的文章,其中 935 篇(94.4%)被排除在外,55 篇(5.6%)相关。报告最多的基础原则是“尊重”(n=25,45%)和“所有团队成员之间平等的权力”(n=21,38%)。有 17 篇文章(31%)描述了“在患者利益相关者和研究人员之间建立信任”。27 篇文章(49%)强调了为患者利益相关者和研究人员提供培训和教育的重要性。有 19 篇文章(35%)指出,为患者利益相关者的时间和专业知识提供经济补偿的重要性。20 篇文章(36%)强调了患者伙伴和研究人员之间定期、双向对话的重要性,这对成功的参与至关重要。

讨论和结论

将患者利益相关者作为合作伙伴纳入研究提供了一个机会,可以设计、实施和传播以患者为中心的研究。本综述为患者利益相关者和研究人员之间建立真实和可持续的伙伴关系创建了一个总体基础框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed8/6543160/0150ed77ff23/HEX-22-307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed8/6543160/be42e6fc7dcd/HEX-22-307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed8/6543160/0150ed77ff23/HEX-22-307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed8/6543160/be42e6fc7dcd/HEX-22-307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed8/6543160/0150ed77ff23/HEX-22-307-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.患者利益相关者参与研究:描述基础原则和最佳实践活动的叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
3
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
4
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
6
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach.研究伙伴关系综述:一种协调的多中心团队方法。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 30;7(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2.
10
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging children, young adults, and other partners to identify priorities for sport related concussion research.让儿童、年轻人和其他合作伙伴参与,以确定与运动相关的脑震荡研究的优先事项。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 15;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00765-5.
2
Commonalities and distinctions of pediatric patient and family engagement in clinical care, education, and research contexts: Protocol for a scoping review.儿科患者及其家庭在临床护理、教育和研究背景下参与的共性与差异:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0330104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330104. eCollection 2025.
3
How to become partners. Ways to enhance the quality of patient and public involvement in healthcare research.

本文引用的文献

1
A Critical Discussion of Patient Engagement in Research.关于患者参与研究的批判性讨论
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Jan 31;4(1):39-41. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1273. eCollection 2017 Winter.
2
Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want.2型糖尿病研究中的患者参与度:患者的需求。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Apr 20;12:595-606. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S159707. eCollection 2018.
3
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
如何成为合作伙伴。提高患者和公众参与医疗保健研究质量的方法。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;9(2):100016. doi: 10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100016. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Enhancing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research trial leadership and participation: insights from the initial stages of the Australian Fans in Training Project in the Northern Territory of Australia.加强原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民在研究试验中的领导力与参与度:来自澳大利亚北领地“球迷训练项目”初始阶段的见解
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 18;15(7):e095720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095720.
5
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件:借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.
6
How are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews.患者合作伙伴如何参与卫生服务研究?一项综述的范围界定综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 8;11(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7.
7
Operationalising Patient Engagement Through the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative: Recruitment Strategies for Diverse Populations in Health System Improvement.通过艾伯塔癌症诊断计划实现患者参与:卫生系统改善中不同人群的招募策略
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70306. doi: 10.1111/hex.70306.
8
The role of stakeholder mapping and engagement in Mongolia during the implementation of the STREAM clinical trial for MDR-TB.在耐多药结核病STREAM临床试验实施过程中,利益相关者映射与参与在蒙古所发挥的作用。
Trials. 2025 May 29;26(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08887-7.
9
Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.早期家访中的社区参与式研究:同行评审文献的范围综述
Prev Sci. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z.
10
Improving How Healthcare Staff Support the Psychological Well-Being of People Living With Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Co-Created Study.改善医护人员对中风后失语症患者心理健康的支持方式:一项共同创建的研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70303. doi: 10.1111/hex.70303.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
4
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
5
Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research.患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs):确定支持参与研究的挑战和解决方案。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):413-423. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0298-4.
6
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)健康与社会护理研究设计阶段的公众参与框架:制定具有道德意识的标准的时候到了。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 4;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y. eCollection 2017.
7
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress.一个用于有意义且灵活参与临床试验的患者和公众参与(PPI)工具包——正在进行中的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
8
Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis.让老年人参与医疗保健研究与规划:一项实在论综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 7;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0022-2. eCollection 2016.
9
The patient voice in research-evolution of a role.患者在研究中的声音——角色的演变
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Feb 22;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0020-4. eCollection 2016.
10
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability.患者及公众参与初级医疗研究——确保其可持续性的一个实例
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jan 14;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1. eCollection 2016.