• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过艾伯塔癌症诊断计划实现患者参与:卫生系统改善中不同人群的招募策略

Operationalising Patient Engagement Through the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative: Recruitment Strategies for Diverse Populations in Health System Improvement.

作者信息

Botey Anna Pujadas, Brierley Meaghan, Stiphout Michelle, Robson Paula J

机构信息

Cancer Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70306. doi: 10.1111/hex.70306.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70306
PMID:40474367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12141090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engaging diverse populations is critical for designing effective healthcare initiatives. However, strategies for recruiting participants to ensure meaningful engagement, particularly among harder-to-reach groups, remain underexplored. This study examines recruitment approaches used in the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative (ACDI) in Alberta, Canada, to address challenges in cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

A qualitative study, including seven interviews and four focus groups with 10 members of the ACDI project team (none of them patients or community members) and a review of 20 internal ACDI documents, was undertaken. Data were analysed using inductive coding, focusing on identifying recruitment strategies for engaging participants from diverse groups and considerations for facilitating recruitment.

RESULTS

Early commitment to diversity and relationship-building informed recruitment strategies, including working with community brokers and health system navigators. Barriers included a limited time within the grant cycle to develop strong relationships with population groups. The team's capacity to learn from emerging issues, like intersectionality and language, was crucial to developing an adaptive approach to recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailored and adaptive strategies, particularly broker- and community-based approaches, are crucial for engaging diverse groups. Lessons learned can inform future initiatives seeking to involve these groups in healthcare decision-making and programme development.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients and community members were actively involved in the ACDI during its planning and development. Their contributions informed engagement activities, ensuring the inclusion of diverse perspectives. This study examined the ACDI project team's perspectives on recruitment strategies and lessons learned, highlighting the importance of adaptive, community-based approaches in engaging diverse participants.

摘要

背景

让不同人群参与进来对于设计有效的医疗保健举措至关重要。然而,招募参与者以确保有意义的参与的策略,尤其是在难以接触到的群体中,仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了加拿大艾伯塔省癌症诊断倡议(ACDI)中所采用的招募方法,以应对癌症诊断方面的挑战。

方法

开展了一项定性研究,包括对ACDI项目团队的10名成员(均非患者或社区成员)进行7次访谈和4次焦点小组讨论,并对20份ACDI内部文件进行审查。使用归纳编码对数据进行分析,重点是确定从不同群体中招募参与者的策略以及促进招募的考虑因素。

结果

对多样性和关系建立的早期承诺为招募策略提供了指导,包括与社区中介和卫生系统导航员合作。障碍包括在拨款周期内与人群群体建立牢固关系的时间有限。团队从交叉性和语言等新出现的问题中学习的能力对于制定适应性招募方法至关重要。

结论

量身定制的适应性策略,尤其是基于中介和社区的方法,对于吸引不同群体至关重要。吸取的经验教训可为未来旨在让这些群体参与医疗保健决策和项目开发的举措提供参考。

患者或公众贡献

患者和社区成员在ACDI的规划和开发过程中积极参与。他们的贡献为参与活动提供了信息,确保纳入了不同的观点。本研究考察了ACDI项目团队对招募策略和经验教训的看法,强调了适应性的、基于社区的方法在吸引不同参与者方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Operationalising Patient Engagement Through the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative: Recruitment Strategies for Diverse Populations in Health System Improvement.通过艾伯塔癌症诊断计划实现患者参与:卫生系统改善中不同人群的招募策略
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70306. doi: 10.1111/hex.70306.
2
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators for Ethnic Minority Groups to Audio Recording Recruitment Discussions in Clinical Trials: A Participatory Approach to Improving Informed Consent and Participation.了解临床试验中少数族裔群体进行招募讨论录音的障碍与促进因素:一种改善知情同意和参与的参与式方法。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70210. doi: 10.1111/hex.70210.
3
An emerging knowledge exchange framework: Leadership insight into a key capacity-building impact in a large urban, trauma-informed initiative supporting resiliency and promoting equity.一个新兴的知识交流框架:领导力洞察对一项大型城市创伤知情倡议中关键能力建设影响的作用,该倡议支持恢复力并促进公平。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22268-4.
4
Combining PPI with qualitative research to engage 'harder-to-reach' populations: service user groups as co-applicants on a platform study for a trial.将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与定性研究相结合以接触“更难接触到”的人群:服务用户群体作为平台研究试验的共同申请人
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0023-1. eCollection 2016.
5
Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.与多元化社区共同设计以人为本的质量指标:一项定性的患者参与研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2188-2202. doi: 10.1111/hex.13388. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey.开发健康体验的催化剂薄膜:对一个稳健的多利益相关者参与过程的分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00369-3.
7
Operationalizing the principles of patient engagement through a Patient Advisory Council: Lessons and recommendations.通过患者顾问委员会使患者参与原则运作化:经验教训和建议。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13909. doi: 10.1111/hex.13909. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
8
Assets and Challenges to Recruiting and Engaging Families in a Childhood Obesity Treatment Research Trial: Insights From Academic Partners, Community Partners, and Study Participants.招募和吸引家庭参与儿童肥胖症治疗研究试验的资产和挑战:学术合作伙伴、社区合作伙伴和研究参与者的见解。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;9:631749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.631749. eCollection 2021.
9
Conducting qualitative research on cervical cancer screening among diverse groups of immigrant women: research reflections: challenges and solutions.对不同群体的移民妇女进行宫颈癌筛查的定性研究:研究反思:挑战与解决方案。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Apr;56(4):e130-5.
10
Bringing Value-Based Perspectives to Care: Including Patient and Family Members in Decision-Making Processes.将价值为基础的观点引入医疗照护:让患者及其家属参与决策过程。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):661-668. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.27.

本文引用的文献

1
Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy.招募参与健康政策。
Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep;20(SP):36-47. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27415.
2
Partnered Recruitment: Engaging Individuals With Lived Experience in the Recruitment of Co-Design Participants.合作伙伴招募:让具有亲身经验的个人参与共同设计参与者的招募。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14131. doi: 10.1111/hex.14131.
3
Working With Indigenous Community and Patient Partners Is Essential to Advance Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research: Perspectives From Canada.与原住民社区和患者合作伙伴合作对于推进胃肠病学和肝病学研究至关重要:来自加拿大的观点
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Nov;21(12):2993-2998. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.08.005.
4
Diversity in patient and public involvement in healthcare research and education-Realising the potential.患者和公众参与医疗保健研究和教育的多样性——挖掘潜力。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13896. doi: 10.1111/hex.13896. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review.招募患者、护理人员和公众成员加入公共和患者参与的健康研究中的咨询委员会、小组和专题小组:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 13;13(10):e072918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918.
6
Addressing Cancer Disparities Through Community Engagement: Lessons and Best Practices.通过社区参与解决癌症差异:经验教训与最佳实践
Cureus. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43445. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Engaging diverse patients in a diverse world: the development and preliminary evaluation of educational modules to support diversity in patient engagement research.在多元世界中吸引不同患者参与:支持患者参与研究多元化的教育模块的开发与初步评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 7;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00455-0.
8
Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness.社区参与和利益相关者参与确定卫生服务覆盖范围:系统评价和框架综合评估有效性。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 12;13:04034. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04034.
9
From Testers to Cocreators-the Value of and Approaches to Successful Patient Engagement in the Development of eHealth Solutions: Qualitative Expert Interview Study.从测试者到共同创造者——电子健康解决方案开发中患者成功参与的价值与方法:定性专家访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 6;9(4):e41481. doi: 10.2196/41481.
10
Public and patient involvement in health policy decision-making on the health system level - A scoping review.公众和患者在卫生系统层面参与卫生政策决策——一项范围综述。
Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):1023-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 20.