Suppr超能文献

重组人血管内皮抑制素联合化疗治疗非驱动基因突变晚期非小细胞肺癌的真实世界结局。

Real-world outcomes of various regimens of recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy in non-driver gene mutation advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Lung Cancer and Gastrointestinal Unit, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Graduate Schools, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 Apr;8(4):1434-1441. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2014. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Abstract

AIMS

This real-world study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for non-driver genes mutation non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and establish evidence-based optimal regimen for rh-endostatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using propensity score matching (cut-off: 0.01), 88 patients were eligible for our study, 34 of which received platinum-based chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy group), 54 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy plus rh-endostatin (rh-endostatin group). Among those 54 patients in the rh-endostatin group, 27 patients received rh-endostatin administered at 7.5 mg/m from day 1 to day 14 (rh-endostatin 14d group), and the other 27 patients were administered at 15 mg/m from day 1 to day 7 (rh-endostatin 7d group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

There were no differences in clinic characteristics among 3 groups. Compared with chemotherapy group, rh-endostatin group improved PFS and OS significantly. The median PFS was 6 months vs 4.5 months (P = 0.047), and median OS was 20 months vs 10 months (P < 0.001). The ORR was 33.3% vs 20.6% (P = 0.197) and DCR was 83.3% vs 64.7% (P = 0.046) in the rh-endostatin group and chemotherapy group, respectively. The comparisons between the rh-endostatin 7d and 14d groups revealed a significant improvement in PFS for the rh-endostatin 7d group (P = 0.044), but no significant differences in OS (P = 0.111), ORR (P = 0.074), or DCR (P = 0.234). The incidences of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were similar among 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy combined with rh-endostatin was more effective than chemotherapy alone for non-driver gene mutation NSCLC patients. The administration of rh-endostatin for 7 days at 15 mg/m was non-inferior to 14 days at 7.5 mg/m in prolonging patients' PFS. Further evaluation should be conducted before its application in clinical work.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估重组人血管内皮抑制素(rh-endostatin)联合化疗作为非驱动基因突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性,并为 rh-endostatin 建立基于证据的最佳治疗方案。

方法

采用倾向性评分匹配(截止值:0.01),纳入 88 例符合条件的患者,其中 34 例接受铂类化疗(化疗组),54 例接受铂类化疗联合 rh-endostatin(rh-endostatin 组)。在 rh-endostatin 组的 54 例患者中,27 例患者接受 rh-endostatin 7.5mg/m2 治疗(rh-endostatin 14d 组),27 例患者接受 rh-endostatin 15mg/m2 治疗(rh-endostatin 7d 组)。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点为总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和安全性。

结果

3 组患者的临床特征无差异。与化疗组相比,rh-endostatin 组 PFS 和 OS 显著改善。rh-endostatin 组中位 PFS 为 6 个月,化疗组为 4.5 个月(P=0.047),中位 OS 分别为 20 个月和 10 个月(P<0.001)。rh-endostatin 组和化疗组的 ORR 分别为 33.3%和 20.6%(P=0.197),DCR 分别为 83.3%和 64.7%(P=0.046)。rh-endostatin 7d 组和 rh-endostatin 14d 组比较,rh-endostatin 7d 组 PFS 显著改善(P=0.044),但 OS(P=0.111)、ORR(P=0.074)和 DCR(P=0.234)差异无统计学意义。3 组不良反应发生率相似。

结论

与化疗相比,化疗联合 rh-endostatin 治疗非驱动基因突变 NSCLC 患者更有效。rh-endostatin 以 15mg/m2 治疗 7 天与以 7.5mg/m2 治疗 14 天在延长患者 PFS 方面非劣效。在临床应用前,还需进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验