Efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin (Endostar) combined with pemetrexed/cisplatin followed by rh-endostatin plus pemetrexed maintenance in non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective comparison with standard chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) plus standard chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has shown improved efficacy; however, it is unclear whether it is effective and safe when added to pemetrexed/cisplatin and used as maintenance therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of untreated NSCLC patients administered rh-endostatin plus pemetrexed/cisplatin or pemetrexed/cisplatin. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifty-six and 39 patients received rh-endostatin plus pemetrexed/cisplatin and pemetrexed/cisplatin, and 34 and 29 underwent maintenance treatment, respectively. The median PFS was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.85-14.15) in the rh-endostatin and 8.2 months (4.04-12.36) in the chemotherapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). In patients administered maintenance treatment, rh-endostatin plus pemetrexed was associated with prolonged PFS compared to single-agent pemetrexed when PFS was calculated from first dosing (13.7 [9.41-17.99] vs. 8.2 [4.16-12.24]; P = 0.032); however, PFS did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio 0.618; 95% CI 0.368-1.038; P = 0.069) after adjusting for clinical factors. No difference was observed in the objective response rate between the groups (48.2% vs. 38.5%; P = 0.346), with the exception of men (62.1% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.032) or in the incidence of drug-related or grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In previously untreated, advanced-stage NSCLC patients, first-line treatment with pemetrexed/cisplatin plus rh-endostatin did not prolong PFS or overall survival when compared to pemetrexed/cisplatin, but a trend of improved PFS was observed in patients administered maintenance rh-endostatin plus pemetrexed.