• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时以及为何员工的创造力会助长偏差行为?关键心理机制。

When and why does employee creativity fuel deviance? Key psychological mechanisms.

机构信息

Department of Management and Strategy.

Department of Management and Organization.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1144-1163. doi: 10.1037/apl0000397. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000397
PMID:30762380
Abstract

Drawing on self-enhancement theory, we propose that, intraindividually, employees tend to give themselves credit when they engage in creativity. Perceived creative credit, in turn, activates multiple psychological motives that ultimately affect deviance. On the one hand, perceived creative credit is associated with greater creativity-driven norm-breaking motives and greater entitlement motives, which in turn should increase deviance. On the other hand, perceived creative credit is associated with greater image preservation motives, which in turn should decrease deviance. A within-person study involving 206 employees and their coworkers conducted over a 10-day period provided broad support for the proposed model. In addition, a between-person variable, namely rewards for creativity, moderated the self-crediting process. The within-person serial mediation relationship between creativity and deviance was positive and significant for employees who perceived low rewards for creativity, but was not significant for those who perceived high rewards for creativity. In other words, rewards for creativity in the workplace effectively nullified this within-person self-crediting mechanism among employees. This study thus illustrates that, within individuals, creativity and deviance are related through perceived creative credit and different psychological motives (i.e., serial mediation). However, the strength of this serial mediation relationship varies depending on the availability of formal rewards for creativity (i.e., moderated serial mediation). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

基于自我增强理论,我们提出,个体内部,当员工从事创造性活动时,他们往往会为自己的表现邀功。感知到的创造性信用反过来又激活了多种心理动机,这些动机最终会影响偏差行为。一方面,感知到的创造性信用与更大的创造力驱动的打破规范的动机和更大的权利动机有关,这反过来又应该会增加偏差行为。另一方面,感知到的创造性信用与更大的形象保护动机有关,这反过来又应该会减少偏差行为。一项涉及 206 名员工及其同事的为期 10 天的个体内研究为所提出的模型提供了广泛的支持。此外,一个个体间变量,即创造力的奖励,调节了自我归因过程。对于感知到创造力奖励较低的员工来说,创造力和偏差之间的个体内序列中介关系是积极且显著的,但对于感知到创造力奖励较高的员工来说,这种关系并不显著。换句话说,工作场所的创造力奖励有效地消除了员工个体内部的这种自我归因机制。因此,本研究表明,在个体内部,创造力和偏差通过感知到的创造性信用和不同的心理动机(即序列中介)相关。然而,这种序列中介关系的强度取决于创造力的正式奖励的可用性(即有调节的序列中介)。

相似文献

1
When and why does employee creativity fuel deviance? Key psychological mechanisms.何时以及为何员工的创造力会助长偏差行为?关键心理机制。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1144-1163. doi: 10.1037/apl0000397. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
How does perceived overqualification promote employees' creative deviance: The role of leadership emergence and job autonomy.感知到的学历过高如何促进员工的创造性越轨行为:领导能力显现和工作自主性的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104382. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104382. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Enhancing employee creativity: Effects of choice, rewards and personality.提升员工创造力:选择、奖励与个性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Mar;107(3):503-513. doi: 10.1037/apl0000900. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance.为什么好员工会做坏事:亲环境行为与职场偏差行为之间的联系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15284. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215284.
5
Workplace ostracism and employee creativity: An integrative approach incorporating pragmatic and engagement roles.工作场所排斥与员工创造力:综合实用与参与角色的视角
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Dec;103(12):1358-1366. doi: 10.1037/apl0000320. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
From helping hands to harmful acts: When and how employee volunteering promotes workplace deviance.从助人为乐到为虎作伥:员工志愿服务何时以及如何助长职场偏差行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep;105(9):944-958. doi: 10.1037/apl0000477. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement.偏差与离职:工作不安定性与道德推脱的组织成本。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jan;102(1):26-42. doi: 10.1037/apl0000158. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
8
Are narcissists always bad apples? The relationship between employee narcissism and creative deviance.自恋者总是害群之马吗?员工自恋与创造性越轨行为之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 17;13:1026649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026649. eCollection 2022.
9
Rewards and creative performance: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses.奖励与创造性绩效:基于理论推导假设的元分析检验。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):809-830. doi: 10.1037/a0027652. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Employee Creativity: Creative Self-Efficacy as a Mediator and Negative Affect as a Moderator.强制公民行为与员工创造力:以创造性自我效能感为中介变量、消极情绪为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 21;11:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01640. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of the career calling on the employees' creative deviance.职业使命感对员工创造性越轨行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1069140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1069140. eCollection 2022.
2
"Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.“润滑剂”还是“绊脚石”?团队专制领导与创造性越轨之间的矛盾关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 31;13:835970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835970. eCollection 2022.
3
Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Task Performance: A Sense-Making Perspective.
矛盾型领导与员工任务绩效:一种意义建构视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:753116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753116. eCollection 2021.
4
Towards Employee Creativity in the Healthcare Sector: Investigating the Role of Polychronicity, Job Engagement, and Functional Flexibility.迈向医疗保健行业员工的创造力:探究多重时间导向、工作投入度和功能灵活性的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;9(7):837. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070837.
5
Increasing Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Workload: Does Impression Management Matter?增加强制性公民行为和工作量:印象管理重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01726. eCollection 2019.