Suppr超能文献

数字心理健康应用程序与治疗联盟:初步综述

Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: initial review.

作者信息

Henson Philip, Wisniewski Hannah, Hollis Chris, Keshavan Matcheri, Torous John

机构信息

Research Assistant,Division of Digital Psychiatry,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Harvard Medical School,USA.

Chair of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Director,NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative,NIHR Nottingham BRC Mental Health;and Technology Theme Lead,University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health,UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e15. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.86.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As mental healthcare expands to smartphone apps and other technologies that may offer therapeutic interventions without a therapist involved, it is important to assess the impact of non-traditional therapeutic relationships.AimsTo determine if there were any meaningful data regarding the digital therapeutic alliance in smartphone interventions for serious mental illnesses.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science).

RESULTS

There were five studies that discuss the therapeutic alliance when a mobile application intervention is involved in therapy. However, in none of the studies was the digital therapeutic alliance the primary outcome. The studies looked at different mental health conditions, had different duration of technology use and used different methods for assessing the therapeutic alliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing and optimising the digital therapeutic alliance holds the potential to make tools such as smartphone apps more effective and improve adherence to their use. However, the heterogeneous nature of the five studies we identified make it challenging to draw conclusions at this time. A measure is required to evaluate the digital therapeutic alliance.

摘要

背景

随着精神卫生保健扩展到智能手机应用程序及其他可能无需治疗师参与就能提供治疗干预的技术,评估非传统治疗关系的影响非常重要。

目的

确定在针对严重精神疾病的智能手机干预措施中,是否存在关于数字治疗联盟的有意义的数据。

方法

在四个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase和科学网)中进行文献检索。

结果

有五项研究讨论了移动应用程序干预用于治疗时的治疗联盟。然而,这些研究均未将数字治疗联盟作为主要结果。这些研究关注不同的心理健康状况,技术使用时长不同,且评估治疗联盟的方法各异。

结论

评估和优化数字治疗联盟有可能使智能手机应用程序等工具更有效,并提高其使用的依从性。然而,我们所确定的这五项研究的异质性使得目前难以得出结论。需要一种措施来评估数字治疗联盟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f494/6381418/55ca1a8d6bbc/S2056472418000868_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验