负向反馈而非有序组装,是 Sox2 和 Oct4 在 DNA 上相互作用的基础。

Negative reciprocity, not ordered assembly, underlies the interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 on DNA.

机构信息

Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2019 Feb 14;8:e41017. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41017.

Abstract

The mode of interaction of transcription factors (TFs) on eukaryotic genomes remains a matter of debate. Single-molecule data in living cells for the TFs Sox2 and Oct4 were previously interpreted as evidence of ordered assembly on DNA. However, the quantity that was calculated does not determine binding order but, rather, energy expenditure away from thermodynamic equilibrium. Here, we undertake a rigorous biophysical analysis which leads to the concept of reciprocity. The single-molecule data imply that Sox2 and Oct4 exhibit negative reciprocity, with expression of Sox2 increasing Oct4's genomic binding but expression of Oct4 decreasing Sox2's binding. Models show that negative reciprocity can arise either from energy expenditure or from a mixture of positive and negative cooperativity at distinct genomic loci. Both possibilities imply unexpected complexity in how TFs interact on DNA, for which single-molecule methods provide novel detection capabilities.

摘要

转录因子 (TFs) 在真核基因组上的相互作用模式仍然存在争议。以前,活细胞中单分子数据被解释为 Sox2 和 Oct4 TFs 在 DNA 上有序组装的证据。然而,计算出的数量并不能确定结合顺序,而是远离热力学平衡的能量消耗。在这里,我们进行了严格的生物物理分析,从而提出了相互作用的概念。单分子数据表明 Sox2 和 Oct4 表现出负相互作用,Sox2 的表达增加了 Oct4 的基因组结合,但 Oct4 的表达减少了 Sox2 的结合。模型表明,负相互作用可能来自能量消耗,也可能来自不同基因组位置的正协同作用和负协同作用的混合物。这两种可能性都意味着 TFs 在 DNA 上相互作用的方式存在意想不到的复杂性,而单分子方法为此提供了新的检测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ae/6375704/9876492c4b9f/elife-41017-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索