• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同治疗静脉曲张方法的长期疗效:一项网状Meta分析。

Long-term efficacy of different procedures for treatment of varicose veins: A network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Guo Liqin, Huang Rong, Zhao Dunyong, Xu Guilian, Liu Hui, Yang Jian, Guo Tao

机构信息

School of Nursing, Huanggang Polytechnic College, Huanggang.

Institute of Digestive, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014495.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000014495
PMID:30762775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6408126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various procedures for the treatment of varicose veins have been shown to have long-term effectiveness, but research has yet to identify the most effective procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of different procedures based on Bayesian network meta-analysis and to rank therapeutic options for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Globally recognized databases, namely, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Quantitative pooled estimation of successful treatment rate (STR) and recurrence rate (RR) was performed to assess the long-term efficacy of each procedure with more than a 1-year follow-up. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities of the P values regarding STR and RR were calculated to rank various procedures. Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were utilized for the recommendation of evidence from pairwise direct comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 39 RCTs encompassing a total of 6917 limbs were eligible and provided relative raw data. After quantitative analysis, the CHIVA procedure was determined to have the best long-term efficacy, as it had the highest STR (SUCRA, 0.37). Additionally, the results revealed that CHIVA possessed the highest probability of achieving the lowest long-term RR (SUCRA, 0.61). Moreover, the sensitivity analysis with inconsistency approach clarified the reliability of the main results, and the evidence of most direct comparisons was ranked as high or moderate.

CONCLUSION

CHIVA seemed to have superior clinical benefits on long-term efficacy for treating varicose veins. However, the conclusion still needs additional trials for supporting evidence.

摘要

背景

各种治疗静脉曲张的手术已被证明具有长期疗效,但尚未确定最有效的手术方式。本研究旨在基于贝叶斯网络荟萃分析探讨不同手术的长期疗效,并对治疗方案进行排序以辅助临床决策。

方法

检索全球知名数据库,即MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Central,查找随机对照试验(RCT)。对成功治疗率(STR)和复发率(RR)进行定量汇总估计,以评估每种随访时间超过1年的手术的长期疗效。计算STR和RR的P值的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率,对各种手术进行排序。采用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)标准对两两直接比较的证据进行推荐。

结果

共有39项RCT符合纳入标准,涉及6917条肢体,并提供了相关原始数据。定量分析后,CHIVA手术被确定具有最佳的长期疗效,因为它具有最高的STR(SUCRA,0.37)。此外,结果显示CHIVA实现最低长期RR的概率最高(SUCRA,0.61)。而且,采用不一致性方法的敏感性分析明确了主要结果的可靠性,大多数直接比较的证据被评为高或中等。

结论

CHIVA在治疗静脉曲张的长期疗效方面似乎具有更好的临床效益。然而,该结论仍需更多试验来提供支持证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/1edb86bd4522/medi-98-e14495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/3b549621ffd3/medi-98-e14495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/1c2fce9c0f5a/medi-98-e14495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/1edb86bd4522/medi-98-e14495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/3b549621ffd3/medi-98-e14495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/1c2fce9c0f5a/medi-98-e14495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29bc/6408126/1edb86bd4522/medi-98-e14495-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term efficacy of different procedures for treatment of varicose veins: A network meta-analysis.不同治疗静脉曲张方法的长期疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014495.
2
CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.CHIVA 方法治疗慢性静脉功能不全。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;9(9):CD009648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009648.pub4.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation.微创技术治疗静脉曲张的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(48):i-xvi, 1-141. doi: 10.3310/hta17480.
4
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.对于小隐静脉曲张,腔内消融治疗(激光或射频)或泡沫硬化疗法与传统手术修复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD010878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices.大隐静脉曲张的腔内消融(射频和激光)及泡沫硬化疗法与开放手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 30(7):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins.系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析,评估下肢静脉曲张静脉内治疗的长期结局。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Mar;6(2):256-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
10
Identifying the Superior Reperfusion Technique in Liver Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis.确定肝移植中的最佳再灌注技术:一项网状Meta分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Sep 18;2019:9034263. doi: 10.1155/2019/9034263. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
High-intensity-focused ultrasound treatment for the chronic venous disease based on the Cure Conservatrice et Hémodynamique de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire (CHIVA) strategy.基于门诊慢性静脉功能不全保守治疗与血流动力学(CHIVA)策略的高强度聚焦超声治疗慢性静脉疾病
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Mar 19;13(4):102233. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102233.
2
Saphenous vein ablation a word of caution.大隐静脉消融:一句警示的话。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101728. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101728. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency.

本文引用的文献

1
CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.CHIVA治疗慢性静脉功能不全的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD009648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009648.pub3.
2
Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices.大隐静脉曲张的腔内消融(射频和激光)及泡沫硬化疗法与开放手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 30(7):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3.
3
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.
静脉曲张和静脉功能不全的治疗策略与挑战
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 26;10(18):5946-5956. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.5946.
4
Therapies of varicose veins: Protocol for the reporting and methodological quality of pairwise meta-analyses.静脉曲张的治疗方法:成对荟萃分析的报告与方法学质量方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(25):e16042. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016042.
STATA 中的网络荟萃分析图形工具。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 3;8(10):e76654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654. eCollection 2013.
4
Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins.比较静脉内激光消融术、泡沫硬化疗法和传统手术治疗大隐静脉曲张。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):727-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.074. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Comparison of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation and stripping for varicose vein treatment: a meta-analysis.腔内激光消融术与高位结扎剥脱术治疗静脉曲张的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Phlebology. 2014 Mar;29(2):109-19. doi: 10.1177/0268355512473911. Epub 2013 May 6.
6
Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous vein.随机对照临床试验:超声引导下泡沫硬化疗法与手术治疗大隐静脉曲张的对比研究。
Br J Surg. 2012 Aug;99(8):1062-70. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8781. Epub 2012 May 25.
7
Recurrent varicose veins of the lower limbs after surgery. Role of surgical technique (stripping vs. CHIVA) and surgeon's experience.下肢手术后复发性静脉曲张。手术技术(剥脱术与CHIVA)及外科医生经验的作用
G Chir. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(11-12):460-3.
8
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
9
Great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation versus standard stripping in the management of primary varicose veins-a randomized clinical trial.大隐静脉射频消融与传统剥脱术治疗原发性静脉曲张的随机临床试验。
Angiology. 2011 Jan;62(1):49-54. doi: 10.1177/0003319710380680. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
10
Surgical management of varicose veins: meta-analysis.静脉曲张的手术治疗:荟萃分析
Vascular. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):205-20. doi: 10.2310/6670.2010.00013.