Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy with Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):471-478. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12813. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Myocardial infarction (MI) in young adults accounts for up to 10% of all cases. Regarding life expectancy and professional activity, it is extremely important to restore and maintain young patients' full performance. Therefore, secondary prevention is especially vital in this group of patients. The paper focuses on the analysis of pharmacotherapy in young MI patients in Poland, assessing disparities between the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and clinical practice, and regional differences among the provinces.
The analysis was conducted using the data from a nationwide, observational, multicentre, prospective study-the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). The data were collected from patients ≤45 years old with MI who were hospitalized in the period 2010-2014.
A retrospective study included 6367 MI patients. They constituted 3.9% of all the patients with MI in Poland. Despite the fact that during hospitalization regional differences were observed in case of acetylsalicylic acid (range 70.3%-93.8%), β-blockers (range 50.0%-79.6%), statins (range 53.4%-85.7%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (range 46.9%-75.0%), the majority of patients received the drugs according to the guidelines. Regional differences found at discharge also regarded those medications, but the range of observed variations was smaller. On average, three-quarter of patients received guideline-recommended medications. Still, in some provinces, almost a quarter of patients were administered those medications only at discharge.
In the study population, there were significant differences between the provinces regarding pharmacotherapy during hospitalization, which concerned major groups of medications. However, pharmacotherapy indicated at discharge revealed fewer regional differences and adhered to guideline recommendations to a greater extent. Nevertheless, there is still some room for improvement, especially with regard to pharmacotherapy during hospitalization.
在所有病例中,年轻人(<45 岁)心肌梗死(MI)占 10%。对于预期寿命和职业活动而言,恢复和维持年轻患者的完全表现极其重要。因此,二级预防在这群患者中尤为重要。本文主要分析波兰年轻 MI 患者的药物治疗,评估欧洲心脏病学会指南与临床实践之间的差异,以及各省之间的地域差异。
使用全国性、观察性、多中心、前瞻性研究——波兰急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(PL-ACS)的数据进行分析。该研究纳入了 2010-2014 年住院的年龄≤45 岁的 MI 患者。
回顾性研究纳入了 6367 例 MI 患者,占波兰 MI 患者的 3.9%。尽管在住院期间,各地区间乙酰水杨酸(范围 70.3%-93.8%)、β受体阻滞剂(范围 50.0%-79.6%)、他汀类药物(范围 53.4%-85.7%)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(范围 46.9%-75.0%)的使用存在差异,但大多数患者仍按指南接受了治疗。出院时的地域差异也与这些药物有关,但观察到的差异范围较小。平均而言,四分之三的患者接受了指南推荐的药物治疗。尽管如此,在某些省份,仍有近四分之一的患者仅在出院时接受了这些药物治疗。
在研究人群中,各地区间在住院期间的药物治疗方面存在显著差异,涉及主要药物类别。然而,出院时的药物治疗显示出较少的地域差异,且在更大程度上符合指南建议。尽管如此,仍有改进的空间,尤其是在住院期间的药物治疗方面。