Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine, and Prevention Research, University Hospital of Cologne , Cologne , Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine , Göttingen , Germany.
Account Res. 2019 Aug;26(6):391-396. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1582340. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Herein, we discuss a novel way to knit current life sciences publishing structures together under the scope of a single life science journal that would countermand many of the issues faced in current publishing paradigms. Such issues include, but are not limited to, publication fees, subscription fees, impact factor, and publishing in more "glamorous" journals for career health. We envision a process flow involving (i) a single, overall, life sciences journal, (ii) divided into sections headed by learned societies, (iii) to whom all scientific papers are submitted for peer review, and (iv) all accepted scientific literature would be published open access and without author publication fees. With such a structure, journal fees, the merit system of science, and unethical aspects of open access would be reformed for the better. Importantly, such a journal could leverage existing online platforms; that is to say, it is conceptually feasible. We conclude that wholly inclusive publishing paradigms can be possible. A single, open access, online, life sciences journal could solve the myriad problems associated with current publishing paradigms and would be feasible to implement.
在此,我们讨论了一种将当前生命科学出版结构编织在一起的新方法,即在一个单一的生命科学期刊范围内,该方法可以解决当前出版模式面临的许多问题。这些问题包括但不限于出版费、订阅费、影响因子以及为了职业健康而在更“光鲜”的期刊上发表论文的问题。我们设想了一个涉及以下步骤的流程:(i) 一个单一的、全面的生命科学期刊;(ii) 按专业学会划分;(iii) 所有科学论文都提交给这些学会进行同行评审;(iv) 所有被接受的科学文献都将以开放获取的方式出版,且作者无需支付出版费。通过这样的结构,可以更好地改革期刊费、科学的择优制度和开放获取的不道德方面。重要的是,这样的期刊可以利用现有的在线平台;也就是说,从概念上讲是可行的。我们得出结论,完全包容的出版模式是可能的。一个单一的、开放获取的、在线的生命科学期刊可以解决当前出版模式所带来的诸多问题,并且是可行的。