Institute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Health Sciences, FH Campus Wien - University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Objective return to sport (RTS) criteria after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are lacking. Study purposes were (1) to report Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) values achieved in a test battery, (2) to detect how many subjects meet RTS criteria 12-18 months post-operative and (3) to identify whether patient-administered scores predict RTS criteria.
Observer-blinded, cross-sectional observational study.
Traumacenter Linz, Austria.
Eighty-eight subjects (48 females; mean (SD) age: 34.73 (10.8) years); Twenty-five had undergone ACL repair (IB), 21 ACL reconstruction (AI). Forty-two healthy subjects served as control.
Participants were evaluated using a single-leg hop test battery. The variable of interest was meeting the RTS criteria by reaching defined cut-off values. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between subjective scores (IKDC, WOMAC, KOOS, Lysholm) and fulfillment of RTS criteria. Additionally, subjective physical activity and anterior knee translation were assessed.
Thirty-six percent of IB patients and 28.6% of AI patients met RTS criteria. None of the included scores produced significant odds to predict RTS.
Subjective scores, clinical examinations and fulfillment of RTS criteria did not differ significantly between groups. Maximum anterior translation revealed a significant difference (p = 0.009) in favor of the AI group.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后客观的重返运动(RTS)标准缺乏。研究目的是:(1)报告在一系列测试中获得的肢体对称性指数(LSI)值,(2)检测有多少受试者在术后 12-18 个月符合 RTS 标准,(3)确定患者自我评估的分数是否能预测 RTS 标准。
观察者设盲、横断面观察性研究。
奥地利林茨创伤中心。
88 名受试者(48 名女性;平均(标准差)年龄:34.73(10.8)岁);25 名接受 ACL 修复(IB),21 名接受 ACL 重建(AI)。42 名健康受试者作为对照组。
参与者使用单腿跳跃测试电池进行评估。感兴趣的变量是通过达到定义的临界值来满足 RTS 标准。逻辑回归用于研究主观评分(IKDC、WOMAC、KOOS、Lysholm)与满足 RTS 标准之间的关系。此外,还评估了主观身体活动和前膝平移。
36%的 IB 患者和 28.6%的 AI 患者符合 RTS 标准。纳入的评分都没有产生显著的预测 RTS 的可能性。
主观评分、临床检查和 RTS 标准在各组之间没有显著差异。最大前向平移在 AI 组中具有显著差异(p=0.009)。