• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RetroBRACE 研究:ACL 修复和内置式 Brace 增强后 2 年的临床、社会经济学和功能生物力学结果与 ACL 重建和健康对照组比较-一项非随机单中心对照研究的实验方案。

RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709
PMID:35105587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8808437/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional-biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020-00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov.Trial registration numberNCT04429165.

摘要

简介

尽管文献中报道了良好的临床结果,但迄今为止,关于原发性前交叉韧带(ACL)修复加增强的功能和生物力学益处的科学证据仍然很少。我们提出了一项详细的多模态(临床、社会经济学、功能和生物力学)比较研究的实验方案,该研究涉及原发性 ACL 修复和 InternalBrace 增强后的患者、ACL 重建后和健康对照组的患者。

方法和分析

这是一项非随机、单中心、前瞻性数据收集的比较研究,分为三组(ACL 修复和 InternalBrace 增强后 2 年的患者;使用自体腘绳肌腱重建 ACL 后 2 年的患者;和健康对照组),每组 30 名参与者。该研究设计为具有三个臂的非劣效性研究。根据文献中关于肌肉力量、本体感觉和平衡参数的报道,估计所需的样本量,每组至少需要 28 名参与者。主要结果包括患者报告的结果测量(EQ-5D-5L、Tegner 活动量表、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、国际膝关节文献委员会和 ACL-重返运动损伤量表)、社会经济学参数、胫骨前平移、活动范围和下肢的功能-生物力学数据。功能-生物力学参数包括本体感觉、等速肌肉力量、单腿平衡、步行、跑步和单腿跳跃,以及下肢的 3D 关节运动学和动力学以及肌肉活动。这些参数将在患者的肢体之间、组之间以及与当前文献进行比较。

伦理和传播

本研究的结果将通过同行评议的出版物和在国家和国际会议上的演讲进行传播。该研究已获得地区伦理委员会(瑞士西北伦理委员会 EKNZ 2020-00551)的批准,并在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册。试验注册号 NCT04429165。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/9a06cf91e6f6/bmjopen-2021-054709f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/6c21c29ae553/bmjopen-2021-054709f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/45daa95a56c0/bmjopen-2021-054709f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/9a06cf91e6f6/bmjopen-2021-054709f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/6c21c29ae553/bmjopen-2021-054709f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/45daa95a56c0/bmjopen-2021-054709f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/475f/8808437/9a06cf91e6f6/bmjopen-2021-054709f03.jpg

相似文献

1
RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional-biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls-experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study.RetroBRACE 研究:ACL 修复和内置式 Brace 增强后 2 年的临床、社会经济学和功能生物力学结果与 ACL 重建和健康对照组比较-一项非随机单中心对照研究的实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709.
2
Favorable Patient-Reported, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Augmentation Compared With ACL Reconstruction and Healthy Controls.ACL 修复和内置支具增强后 2 年的患者报告、临床和功能结局优于 ACL 重建和健康对照组。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;51(12):3131-3141. doi: 10.1177/03635465231194784. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.研究方案:一项单盲、多中心、随机对照试验,比较急性前交叉韧带撕裂患者的动态关节内稳定、内部支具韧带增强和重建:LIBRƎ 研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 18;20(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2926-0.
4
Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.前交叉韧带运动损伤(ACL-SPORTS)试验男性患者临床及功能主要结局报告:ACL重建术后1年和2年接受或未接受扰动训练1和2进行二级预防的男性患者结局相似。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2523-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5280-2.
5
Repair versus reconstruction for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: a study protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.前交叉韧带近端撕裂的修复与重建:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04280-y.
6
[InternalBrace ACL Repair - First Experiences and Outcomes].[内置支撑前交叉韧带修复术——初步经验与结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(6):423-430.
7
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Graft and Femoral Cortical Button Fixation at Minimum 20-Year Follow-up.前交叉韧带重建采用腘绳肌腱移植物和股骨皮质纽扣固定的临床和影像学结果:至少 20 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;48(12):2962-2969. doi: 10.1177/0363546520951796. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Internal brace augmentation reconstruction versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled clinical trial study protocol.内置支具增强重建与标准前交叉韧带重建的随机对照临床试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 19;13(12):e065254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065254.
9
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.桥接增强前交叉韧带修复并不逊于自体移植物前交叉韧带重建 2 年的结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1305-1315. doi: 10.1177/0363546520913532. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Ambulatory knee biomechanics and muscle activity 2 years after ACL surgery: InternalBrace-augmented ACL repair versus ACL reconstruction versus healthy controls.膝关节 ACL 术后 2 年的门诊膝关节生物力学和肌肉活动:带内置支具的 ACL 修复与 ACL 重建与健康对照组的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 4;24(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06916-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Landing Biomechanics in Patients 2 Years After Augmented ACL Repair and 2 Years After Hamstring Autograft ACL Reconstruction Compared With Controls.与对照组相比,前交叉韧带(ACL)增强修复术后2年及自体腘绳肌腱ACL重建术后2年患者的着陆生物力学
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 25;13(7):23259671251358386. doi: 10.1177/23259671251358386. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Ambulatory knee biomechanics and muscle activity 2 years after ACL surgery: InternalBrace-augmented ACL repair versus ACL reconstruction versus healthy controls.膝关节 ACL 术后 2 年的门诊膝关节生物力学和肌肉活动:带内置支具的 ACL 修复与 ACL 重建与健康对照组的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 4;24(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06916-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical, Functional, and Physical Activity Outcomes 5 Years Following the Treatment Algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study.临床、功能和身体活动结果 5 年后的治疗算法的特拉华州 - 奥斯陆 ACL 队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Aug 18;103(16):1473-1481. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01731.
2
Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.关节镜下 ACL 修复中使用缝线袢钢板技术,膝关节稳定,关节活动度恢复满意,但术后 2 年内有 11%的再断裂率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3706-3714. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06399-2. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Functional leg performance 2 years after ACL surgery: a comparison between InternalBrace™-augmented repair versus reconstruction versus healthy controls.
ACL 手术后 2 年的功能性腿部表现:InternalBrace™增强修复与重建与健康对照组的比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00723-5.
4
Comparison of proprioception recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an artificial graft versus an autograft.前交叉韧带重建中使用人工移植物与自体移植物后本体感觉恢复的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 3;23(1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06019-9.
Efficacy of Nonaugmented, Static Augmented, and Dynamic Augmented Suture Repair of the Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
非增强、静态增强和动态增强缝合修复前交叉韧带断裂的疗效:文献系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;48(14):3626-3637. doi: 10.1177/0363546520904690. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
Measuring only hop distance during single leg hop testing is insufficient to detect deficits in knee function after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.仅在单腿跳跃测试中测量跳跃距离不足以检测 ACL 重建后膝关节功能的缺陷:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;54(3):139-153. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099918. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Running Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带重建术后个体的跑步生物力学:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2019 Sep;49(9):1411-1424. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01120-x.
6
Identifying candidates for arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A case-control study.前交叉韧带关节镜下一期修复的候选者识别:一项病例对照研究。
Knee. 2019 Jun;26(3):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Physical activity and age-related biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis.体力活动与与年龄相关的膝关节骨关节炎生物力学危险因素。
Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Functional performance testing and return to sport criteria in patients after anterior cruciate ligament injury 12-18 months after index surgery: A cross-sectional observational study.前交叉韧带损伤后 12-18 个月患者的功能表现测试和重返运动标准:一项横断面观察性研究。
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes of the first 56 consecutive patients and the role of additional internal bracing.关节镜下初次修复前交叉韧带近端撕裂:56 例连续患者的初步结果和附加内部支撑的作用。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5338-z. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
10
Lower Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landings Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.下肢生物力学在 ACL 重建后单腿着陆时的变化:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 Sep;48(9):2103-2126. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0942-0.