• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗机构中准确测量血压的障碍。

Barriers to Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement in the Medical Office.

作者信息

Hwang Kevin O, Aigbe Aitebureme, Ju Hsiao-Hui, Jackson Victoria C, Sedlock Emily W

机构信息

1 UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

2 University of Texas at Houston-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2018 Jan-Dec;9:2150132718816929. doi: 10.1177/2150132718816929.

DOI:10.1177/2150132718816929
PMID:30764705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6287289/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the high prevalence of blood pressure (BP) measurement errors in the outpatient setting, little is known about why primary care clinics struggle to achieve consistently accurate BP measurements in routine practice. We investigated barriers affecting measurement of BP for adult patients in primary care.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative evaluation in 6 adult primary care clinics. BP measurement was observed during 54 routine patient encounters. Six managers completed semistructured interviews and 18 clinical staff members participated in focus group discussions. We used an inductive, data-driven approach to identify and organize findings into cohesive, overarching themes describing factors affecting BP measurement.

RESULTS

Observed errors in BP measurement spanned the entire spectrum of steps required to obtain BP properly. Barriers to proper BP measurement were related to staff knowledge and behavior (inadequate knowledge, training, and feedback); workflow constraints (need to multitask, inadequate time); and equipment issues (BP monitors, seating). Patient characteristics and behavior also affected BP measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Correct measurement of BP is affected by a wide range of factors and is challenging to accomplish consistently in primary care. These findings may inform the design of performance improvement programs to maximize the quality of BP measurement in the outpatient setting.

摘要

背景

尽管门诊环境中血压(BP)测量误差的发生率很高,但对于基层医疗诊所为何在日常实践中难以始终获得准确的血压测量结果,人们知之甚少。我们调查了影响基层医疗中成年患者血压测量的障碍因素。

方法

我们在6家成人基层医疗诊所进行了定性评估。在54次常规患者诊疗过程中观察血压测量情况。6名管理人员完成了半结构化访谈,18名临床工作人员参加了焦点小组讨论。我们采用归纳法、数据驱动的方法来识别并将研究结果组织成连贯的、总体性的主题,以描述影响血压测量的因素。

结果

观察到的血压测量误差涵盖了正确测量血压所需的各个步骤。正确测量血压的障碍与工作人员的知识和行为(知识不足、培训不足和反馈不足)、工作流程限制(需要同时处理多项任务、时间不足)以及设备问题(血压监测仪、座位)有关。患者的特征和行为也会影响血压测量。

结论

血压的正确测量受到多种因素的影响,在基层医疗中持续实现具有挑战性。这些发现可为绩效改进计划的设计提供参考,以在门诊环境中最大限度地提高血压测量质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/6287289/2137de18006c/10.1177_2150132718816929-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/6287289/2137de18006c/10.1177_2150132718816929-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d39/6287289/2137de18006c/10.1177_2150132718816929-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement in the Medical Office.医疗机构中准确测量血压的障碍。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2018 Jan-Dec;9:2150132718816929. doi: 10.1177/2150132718816929.
2
Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study.基层医疗环境中血压的测量与管理:一项务实的实施研究
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):375-388. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450.
3
Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines.根据现行指南在基层医疗诊所诊断高血压
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):170-177. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160111.
4
Human Errors in Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement: Still Room for Improvement.自动化办公室血压测量中的人为误差:仍有改进空间。
Hypertension. 2021 Jan;77(1):6-15. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16164. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff.影响初级保健诊所实施物质使用筛查的障碍和促进因素:对患者、提供者和工作人员的定性研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Apr 9;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0110-8.
6
Current practice of usual clinic blood pressure measurement in people with and without diabetes: a survey and prospective 'mystery shopper' study in UK primary care.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者常规门诊血压测量的当前实践:英国初级医疗保健中的一项调查及前瞻性“神秘顾客”研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e020589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020589.
7
Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?测量血压以做出决策和报告质量:测量多少个部位和多少次?
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21;154(12):781-8, W-289-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00005.
8
Use of unattended automated office blood pressure in Utah primary care clinics.犹他州初级保健诊所中无人值守的自动化办公血压监测的使用。
Blood Press Monit. 2022 Jun 1;27(3):161-167. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000579. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
9
The Gap Between Manual and Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Results at a Hypertension Clinic.高血压诊所中手动和自动办公血压测量结果之间的差距。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 May;33(5):653-657. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
10
STRIDE BP: an international initiative for accurate blood pressure measurement.STRIDE BP:一项旨在准确测量血压的国际倡议。
J Hypertens. 2020 Mar;38(3):395-399. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002289.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to proper blood pressure measurements among interns at the university of Gondar specialized referral hospital.贡德尔大学专科医院实习生对正确血压测量方法的依从性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 12;12:1436256. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1436256. eCollection 2025.
2
A deep learning digital biomarker to detect hypertension and stratify cardiovascular risk from the electrocardiogram.一种用于从心电图检测高血压并对心血管风险进行分层的深度学习数字生物标志物。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 22;8(1):120. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01491-8.
3
Blood pressure measurement technique in clinical practice in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Repeated Measurements With Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care.在基层医疗中,重复测量与血压控制的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):858-860. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0315.
2
The ACC/AHA 2017 Hypertension Guidelines: Both Too Much and Not Enough of a Good Thing?《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2017年高血压指南:是好事过头还是做得不够?》
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):287-288. doi: 10.7326/M17-3103. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
英国国家医疗服务体系大格拉斯哥和克莱德地区临床实践中的血压测量技术
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Mar;39(3):205-209. doi: 10.1038/s41371-024-00984-5. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
4
Assessment of blood pressure measurement technique amongst nurses working at a tertiary care cardiac center.评估在三级心脏中心工作的护士的血压测量技术。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 19;19(9):e0308485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308485. eCollection 2024.
5
Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment using 'real world' clinic blood pressures compared to standardized unobserved and ambulatory methods: an observational study.采用“真实世界”诊所血压与标准化未观察和动态方法进行绝对心血管风险评估:一项观察性研究。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2855-2863. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01841-1. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
6
Predictors of blood pressure reductions with a second measurement in individuals with uncontrolled blood pressure in primary care clinics.基层医疗诊所中血压未得到控制的个体二次测量时血压降低的预测因素。
Vasc Med. 2024 Oct;29(5):553-555. doi: 10.1177/1358863X241257140. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
7
Intelligent Assist Office Blood Pressures (IOBP) versus awake ambulatory monitoring and conventional auscultatory office readings in Chinese primary medical institutions.智能辅助诊室血压(IOBP)与清醒动态监测和常规听诊诊室读数在华基层医疗机构中的比较。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Jul;47(7):1822-1830. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01687-7. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Blood pressure variability supersedes heart rate variability as a real-world measure of dementia risk.血压变异性优于心率变异性,成为衡量痴呆风险的真实世界指标。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):1838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52406-8.
9
Screening for hypertension in adults: protocol for evidence reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update.成年人高血压筛查:为更新加拿大预防保健特别工作组指南提供证据综述的方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 5;13(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02392-1.
10
Quality in screening and measuring blood pressure in China's primary health care: a national cross-sectional study using unannounced standardized patients.中国基层医疗卫生机构血压筛查与测量的质量:一项使用未通知标准化患者的全国性横断面研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Nov 23;43:100973. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100973. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
BP Measurement in Clinical Practice: Time to SPRINT to Guideline-Recommended Protocols.临床实践中的血压测量:是时候按照指南推荐的方案冲刺了。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Feb;29(2):383-388. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017070753. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States.在美国高血压筛查期间进行动态血压监测和家庭血压监测的障碍。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Sep;11(9):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines.根据现行指南在基层医疗诊所诊断高血压
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):170-177. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160111.
7
Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014.美国2011 - 2014年成人高血压患病率及控制情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov(220):1-8.
8
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.成人高血压筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):778-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2223. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
10
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.1990年至2013年188个国家79种行为、环境与职业以及代谢风险或风险群组的全球、区域和国家比较风险评估:全球疾病负担研究2013的系统分析
Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2287-323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2. Epub 2015 Sep 11.