Rout Gyanranjan, Kedia Saurabh, Nayak Baibaswata, Yadav Rajni, Das Prasenjit, Acharya Subrat K, Gunjan Deepak, Singh Vishwajeet, Mahanta Mousumi, Gupta Swatantra, Aggarwal Sandeep
Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The gold standard method for measurement of hepatic steatosis is liver histology. Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) can measure hepatic steatosis non-invasively. We aimed to assess the accuracy of CAP for detection of hepatic steatosis.
A total of 462 patients (May 2012-January 2017)-89 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 182 chronic hepatitis B, 88 chronic hepatitis C and 103 patients with other etiologies who underwent simultaneous liver biopsy and CAP estimation using Transient Elastography (TE) were included. Steatosis was graded as S0: steatosis in 0-5% of hepatocytes, S1: 6-33%, S2: 34-66% and S3: 67-100%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the accuracy of CAP in detecting hepatic steatosis. Predictors of CAP were assessed by multivariate linear regression model.
The mean age ± SD was 33.8 ± 11.6 years; 296 (64.1%) were males. On liver histology, steatosis grades S0, S1, S2 and S3 were seen in 331 (71.6%), 74 (16.0%), 39 (8.4%) and 18 (3.9%), respectively. The median CAP (IQR) values for S0, S1, S2, and S3 steatosis were 206 (176-252) dB/m, 295 (257-331) dB/m, 320 (296-356) dB/m, and 349 (306-363) dB/m, respectively. For estimation of ≥S1, ≥S2, and ≥S3 using CAP, AUROC were 0.879, 0.893, and 0.883, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only BMI (OR 1.18; CI, 1.11-1.26, < 0.001) and grade of hepatic steatosis (grade 1, OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.58-9.84, = 0.003; grade 2, OR 42.04; 95% CI, 4.97-355.31, = 0.001 and grade 3, OR 35.83; 95% CI 4.31-297.61, = 0.001) independently predicted CAP.
CAP detects hepatic steatosis with good accuracy in Indian patients with various etiologies.
背景/目的:肝脂肪变性测量的金标准方法是肝脏组织学检查。受控衰减参数(CAP)可无创测量肝脂肪变性。我们旨在评估CAP检测肝脂肪变性的准确性。
纳入了462例患者(2012年5月至2017年1月),其中89例为非酒精性脂肪性肝病,182例为慢性乙型肝炎,88例为慢性丙型肝炎,103例为其他病因患者,这些患者同时接受了肝脏活检和使用瞬时弹性成像(TE)进行的CAP评估。脂肪变性分级为S0:0 - 5%的肝细胞有脂肪变性,S1:6 - 33%,S2:34 - 66%,S3:67 - 100%。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以评估CAP检测肝脂肪变性的准确性。通过多变量线性回归模型评估CAP的预测因素。
平均年龄±标准差为33.8±11.6岁;296例(64.1%)为男性。肝脏组织学检查显示,S0、S1、S2和S3级脂肪变性分别见于331例(71.6%)、74例(16.0%)、39例(8.4%)和18例(3.9%)。S0、S1、S2和S3级脂肪变性的CAP中位数(IQR)值分别为206(176 - 252)dB/m、295(257 - 331)dB/m、320(296 - 356)dB/m和349(306 - 363)dB/m。使用CAP估计≥S1、≥S2和≥S3时,曲线下面积(AUROC)分别为0.879、0.893和0.883。多变量分析中,仅体重指数(OR 1.18;CI,1.11 - 1.26,<0.001)和肝脂肪变性分级(1级,OR,3.94;95%CI,1.58 - 9.84,=0.003;2级,OR 42.04;95%CI,4.97 - 355.31,=0.001;3级,OR 35.83;95%CI 4.31 - 297.61,=0.001)可独立预测CAP。
CAP在印度不同病因患者中检测肝脂肪变性具有良好的准确性。