Suppr超能文献

道德与社会决策的神经科学

The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making.

作者信息

Yoder Keith J, Decety Jean

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Crime Law. 2018;24(3):279-295. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Abstract

Across cultures humans care deeply about morality and create institutions, such as criminal courts, to enforce social norms. In such contexts, judges and juries engage in complex social decision-making to ascertain a defendant's capacity, blameworthiness, and culpability. Cognitive neuroscience investigations have begun to reveal the distributed neural networks which interact to implement moral judgment and social decision-making, including systems for reward learning, valuation, mental state understanding, and salience processing. These processes are fundamental to morality, and their underlying neural mechanisms are influenced by individual differences in empathy, caring and justice sensitivity. This new knowledge has important implication in legal settings for understanding how triers of fact reason. Moreover, recent work demonstrates how disruptions within the social decision-making network facilitate immoral behavior, as in the case of psychopathy. Incorporating neuroscientific methods with psychology and clinical neuroscience has the potential to improve predictions of recidivism, future dangerousness, and responsivity to particular forms of rehabilitation.

摘要

在各种文化中,人类都非常重视道德,并创建诸如刑事法庭等机构来执行社会规范。在这种情况下,法官和陪审团会进行复杂的社会决策,以确定被告的能力、应受谴责性和罪责。认知神经科学研究已经开始揭示相互作用以实现道德判断和社会决策的分布式神经网络,包括奖励学习、估值、心理状态理解和显著性处理系统。这些过程是道德的基础,其潜在的神经机制会受到同理心、关怀和正义敏感度等个体差异的影响。这一新知识在法律环境中对于理解事实认定者的推理方式具有重要意义。此外,最近的研究表明,社会决策网络内的干扰如何助长不道德行为,比如在精神病态的案例中。将神经科学方法与心理学和临床神经科学相结合,有可能改善对累犯、未来危险性以及对特定形式康复的反应性的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b263/6372234/7c0735969fcc/nihms-1500620-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making.道德与社会决策的神经科学
Psychol Crime Law. 2018;24(3):279-295. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Empathy, justice, and moral behavior.同理心、正义与道德行为。
AJOB Neurosci. 2015;6(3):3-14. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
6
The use of neuroscientific evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings.神经科学证据在加拿大刑事诉讼中的使用。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Jun 11;2(3):550-579. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv026. eCollection 2015 Nov.
7
Neuroscience, moral reasoning, and the law.神经科学、道德推理与法律。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):219-36. doi: 10.1002/bsl.854.

引用本文的文献

1
The meaning of ethical collaborative research according to young people.年轻人眼中道德协作研究的意义。
Int J Adolesc Youth. 2025 Jun 18;30(1):2517099. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2025.2517099. eCollection 2025.
5
Neural Correlates of Social Decision-Making.社会决策的神经关联
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;19(1):148-154. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14350.
8
Decision Making and Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review.决策与纤维肌痛:一项系统评价
Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 27;12(11):1452. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111452.
10
Stakeholder-Oriented Firms Have Feelings and Moral Standing Too.以利益相关者为导向的公司也有情感和道德立场。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:814624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814624. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

4
The behavioral and neural basis of empathic blame.共情指责的行为和神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 12;7(1):5200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05299-9.
8
On the evolutionary origins of equity.论公平的进化起源。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0173636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173636. eCollection 2017.
9
Social Decision-Making and the Brain: A Comparative Perspective.社会决策与大脑:比较视角
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;21(4):265-276. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验