• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人眼中道德协作研究的意义。

The meaning of ethical collaborative research according to young people.

作者信息

Chrifou Rabab, Focquaert Farah, Messiha Katrina, Ghaly Mohammed, Altenburg Teatske, Deforche Benedicte, Verloigne Maïté

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Adolesc Youth. 2025 Jun 18;30(1):2517099. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2025.2517099. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/02673843.2025.2517099
PMID:40756502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12312812/
Abstract

Incorporating the perspectives of young people regarding their perspectives on ethical collaborative research may enrich our current understanding of ethical practices within such research, as young people are capable of providing creative, innovative and novel perspectives that otherwise remain unknown to the adult academic establishment. Youth, Ethics & Participation (YEP), a qualitative study conducted as part of the Health CASCADE project, aimed at engaging young people around the nature and meaning of ethics within collaborative research while developing moral awareness. Young people shared their perspectives on the meaning of ethical collaborative research, while showing their interest and ability of moral reasoning through the formulation of arguments explaining their position on a variety of ethically salient issues within collaborative research. The current study indicates that the engagement of young people in collaborative research is a potential source for instigating social change through their engagement in moral reasoning.

摘要

纳入年轻人对伦理协作研究的看法,可能会丰富我们目前对此类研究中伦理实践的理解,因为年轻人能够提供富有创造性、创新性和新颖性的观点,而这些观点是成年学术机构所不了解的。作为健康级联项目的一部分进行的定性研究“青年、伦理与参与”(YEP),旨在让年轻人参与探讨协作研究中伦理的本质和意义,同时培养道德意识。年轻人分享了他们对伦理协作研究意义的看法,同时通过阐述论点来解释他们在协作研究中对各种伦理突出问题的立场,展现出他们的道德推理兴趣和能力。当前的研究表明,年轻人参与协作研究是通过他们参与道德推理来推动社会变革的一个潜在源泉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/50b15f7384de/RADY_A_2517099_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/84f17709131b/RADY_A_2517099_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/84d84ea2a463/RADY_A_2517099_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/ad78cfacc7d5/RADY_A_2517099_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/904c2c784a9a/RADY_A_2517099_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/50b15f7384de/RADY_A_2517099_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/84f17709131b/RADY_A_2517099_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/84d84ea2a463/RADY_A_2517099_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/ad78cfacc7d5/RADY_A_2517099_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/904c2c784a9a/RADY_A_2517099_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/12312812/50b15f7384de/RADY_A_2517099_F0005_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
The meaning of ethical collaborative research according to young people.年轻人眼中道德协作研究的意义。
Int J Adolesc Youth. 2025 Jun 18;30(1):2517099. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2025.2517099. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Axiological reflection for nursing ethics education: The missing link in understanding value conflicts.护理伦理教育的价值论反思:理解价值冲突中缺失的环节
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1230-1239. doi: 10.1177/09697330241295369. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
6
A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s).理解的光谱:对自闭症成年人对友谊的理解与认知的质性探索
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):438-450. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
8
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Are ethical explanations explanatory? Meta-ethical beliefs shape judgments about explanations for social change.道德解释是否具有解释力?元伦理信念影响着对社会变革解释的判断。
Cognition. 2024 Sep;250:105860. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105860. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Working together as scientific and experiential experts: how do current ethical PAR-principles work in a research team with young adults with Developmental Language Disorder?作为科学和经验专家共同合作:当前的伦理参与式行动研究原则在一个针对患有发育性语言障碍的年轻人的研究团队中如何发挥作用?
Educ Action Res. 2022 Oct 6;32(2):311-326. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2022.2130386. eCollection 2024.
3
Combining participatory action research with intervention mapping to develop and plan the implementation and evaluation of a healthy sleep intervention for adolescents.
将参与式行动研究与干预映射相结合,以开发和规划针对青少年的健康睡眠干预措施的实施与评估。
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Dec 16;13(4):316-329. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.37. eCollection 2023.
4
In search of epistemic justice. Dialogical reflection of researchers on situated ethics in studies with people living with language and/or cognitive impairment.追寻认识论正义。与语言和/或认知障碍患者一起开展研究中,研究人员对情境伦理的对话性反思。
J Aging Stud. 2023 Sep;66:101154. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101154. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Making co-creation a trustworthy methodology for closing the implementation gap between knowledge and action in health promotion: the Health CASCADE project.将共同创造作为一种可靠方法,以弥合健康促进中知识与行动之间的实施差距:健康级联项目。
Perspect Public Health. 2023 Jul;143(4):196-198. doi: 10.1177/17579139221136718.
6
Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health.系统评价当代公共卫生领域共同创造、共同设计和共同生产所使用的理论。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):723-737. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046.
7
The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments.道德判断的双加工理论并不否认人们能够做出折中的判断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 7;120(6):e2220396120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220396120. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
8
Ethical considerations in engaging young people in European obesity prevention research: The CO-CREATE experience.让年轻人参与欧洲肥胖预防研究中的伦理考量:共创项目的经验
Obes Rev. 2023 Feb;24 Suppl 1:e13518. doi: 10.1111/obr.13518. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.共同创造、共同设计、共同生产促进公共卫生-对定义和区别的看法。
Public Health Res Pract. 2022 Jun 15;32(2):3222211. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211.
10
Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts.现象学质性方法应用于新型教育社会背景下跨文化体验的分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:785134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134. eCollection 2022.