腰椎显微椎板切除术与传统椎板切除术
Lumbar Microlaminectomy vs Traditional Laminectomy.
作者信息
Lundberg Jaclyn, Langevin Jean-Philippe
机构信息
is a medical student at Creighton University School of Medicine in Omaha, Nebraska. is a physician at Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System in California.
出版信息
Fed Pract. 2017 Dec;34(12):32-35.
Abstract
Lumbar microlaminectomy is associated with shorter hospitalization and lower cost within the VA system.
摘要
在退伍军人事务部系统内，腰椎显微椎板切除术与较短的住院时间和较低的费用相关。
相似文献
1
Lumbar Microlaminectomy vs Traditional Laminectomy.腰椎显微椎板切除术与传统椎板切除术
Fed Pract. 2017 Dec;34(12):32-35.
2
3
Geographic and Hospital Variation in Cost of Lumbar Laminectomy and Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Conditions.腰椎椎板切除术和腰椎融合术治疗退行性疾病的费用在地域和医院间的差异
Neurosurgery. 2017 Aug 1;81(2):331-340. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx047.
4
Cost Analysis of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Diskectomy and Laminectomy Spine Surgery.腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术脊柱手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的成本分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study.棘突间装置与椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症：一项比较有效性研究。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1484-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.053. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
6
Cost effectiveness of chemonucleolysis versus laminectomy in the treatment of herniated nucleus pulposus.化学髓核溶解术与椎板切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本效益分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 May;10(4):363-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198505000-00013.
7
Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).棘突间减压术（Superion）的成本效益和安全性
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz245.
8
[Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional laminectomy in the resection of schwannoma of lumbar vertebra].[微创外科手术与传统椎板切除术在腰椎神经鞘瘤切除术中的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 4;100(4):274-278. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2020.04.007.
9
Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.腰椎管狭窄后路棘突劈开椎管减压术后切口疼痛减轻：一项随机对照研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):51-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
10
A cohort cost analysis of lumbar laminectomy--current trends in surgeon and hospital fees distribution.腰椎板切除术的队列成本分析——外科医生和医院费用分布的当前趋势。
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1434-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
引用本文的文献
1
Uniportal Versus Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.单孔与双孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症：系统评价与更新的Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 29:21925682251339999. doi: 10.1177/21925682251339999.
2
Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.开放性椎板切除术与微创椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 7;11:1357897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1357897. eCollection 2024.
3
Cauda equina syndrome caused by the application of DuraSeal in a microlaminectomy surgery: A case report.在显微腰椎板切除术手术中应用DuraSeal导致马尾综合征：一例报告。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Oct 26;10(30):11178-11184. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.11178.
本文引用的文献
1
Outcome after Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional Laminectomy.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的结果：双侧椎板切开术、喇叭形椎板切除术和传统椎板切除术的随机对照比较
Front Surg. 2016 Apr 8;3:19. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00019. eCollection 2016.
2
Outcomes and Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Lumbar Spine in the Elderly.老年腰椎微创手术的结果与并发症
Cureus. 2016 Mar 5;8(3):e519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.519.
3
Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.微创腰椎手术的围手术期结局：一项系统综述。
World J Orthop. 2015 Dec 18;6(11):996-1005. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.996.
4
Improving health care for veterans--a watershed moment for the VA.改善退伍军人的医疗保健——退伍军人事务部的一个分水岭时刻。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):297-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1406868. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
5
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果：微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较：临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results.腰椎管狭窄症的显微内镜减压术：当前文献及临床结果综述
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:325095. doi: 10.1155/2012/325095. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
The deepening crisis in U.S. health care: a review of data.美国医疗保健危机加剧：数据分析综述。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):575-86. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.j.
8
Outpatient brain tumor surgery and spinal decompression: a prospective study of 1003 patients.门诊脑肿瘤手术和脊髓减压：1003 例患者的前瞻性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jul;69(1):119-26; discussion 126-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318215a270.
9
Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.腰椎管狭窄后路棘突劈开椎管减压术后切口疼痛减轻：一项随机对照研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):51-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
10
An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放后路腰椎体间融合术后急性住院费用差异分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):694-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09621.
Zotero 插件