• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床文档改进计划在研究与分析中的作用不断扩大。

The Expanding Role of Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs in Research and Analytics.

作者信息

Rodenberg Howard, Shay Lynn, Sheffield Karen, Dange Yojanna

机构信息

Baptist Health in Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Jan 1;16(Winter):1d. eCollection 2019 Winter.

PMID:30766455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6341414/
Abstract

The future of clinical documentation improvement (CDI) will require expanding the reach of CDI programs into new areas of expertise because the traditional realms of CDI work are increasingly becoming automated. CDI-based research and analytics can serve as a means for demonstrating continued value to an institution. We present four studies as examples of these efforts. We explored the use of claims data to determine whether a clinical condition meets the criteria for a secondary diagnosis and to evaluate whether a clinical problem should be elevated to the status of a comorbid or complicating condition. We demonstrated a way in which CDI professionals can evaluate the impacts of changes in clinical definitions, and we explored how CDI can work with other institutional programs to decrease length of stay. We believe that these models may serve as a springboard within institutions and among the larger CDI community to make research and analytics a foundation of future CDI activities.

摘要

临床文档改进(CDI)的未来将需要把CDI项目的覆盖范围扩展到新的专业领域,因为传统的CDI工作领域正日益自动化。基于CDI的研究和分析可以作为向机构展示持续价值的一种手段。我们给出四项研究作为这些努力的示例。我们探讨了利用索赔数据来确定一种临床状况是否符合二级诊断标准,以及评估一个临床问题是否应提升到共病或并发状况的地位。我们展示了一种CDI专业人员可以评估临床定义变化影响的方法,并且我们探讨了CDI如何与其他机构项目合作以缩短住院时间。我们相信,这些模型可以作为机构内部以及更大的CDI社区的一个跳板,使研究和分析成为未来CDI活动的基础。

相似文献

1
The Expanding Role of Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs in Research and Analytics.临床文档改进计划在研究与分析中的作用不断扩大。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Jan 1;16(Winter):1d. eCollection 2019 Winter.
2
CDI: A Cog in the Wheel of Information Governance.艰难梭菌感染:信息治理之轮中的一个齿轮
J AHIMA. 2016 Jul;87(7):30-3.
3
Winning the Coding Trifecta: CAC, CDI, and ICD-10. How CAC can strengthen your CDI Program and Increase Collaboration with Coding and Quality Improvement.赢得编码三重奏:计算机辅助编码(CAC)、临床文档改进(CDI)和国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)。计算机辅助编码如何强化您的临床文档改进计划并增进与编码及质量改进部门的协作。
J AHIMA. 2016 Sep;87(9):29-31`.
4
What do we really want from clinical documentation improvement programs?我们对临床文档改进计划的真正诉求是什么?
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Jan;47(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712312. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
5
Post-implementation: making the EHR system work for you.实施后:让电子健康记录系统为你所用。
Med Econ. 2014 Mar 10;91(5):34-6, 38-9.
6
The importance of clinical documentation improvement for Australian hospitals.临床文档改进对澳大利亚医院的重要性。
Health Inf Manag. 2020 Jan;49(1):69-73. doi: 10.1177/1833358319854185. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
7
Delinquent Medical Records: Who Are the Stakeholders for Timely Medical Documentation?逾期医疗记录:谁是及时医疗文件记录的利益相关者?
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2020 Dec 7;18(Winter):1h. eCollection 2021 Winter.
8
CDI programs used to improve quality reporting accuracy.用于提高质量报告准确性的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)项目。
J AHIMA. 2013 Jul;84(7):50-1.
9
Addressing Data, Information, and Record Quality Challenges Through Standards.通过标准应对数据、信息和记录质量挑战。
J AHIMA. 2016 Oct;87(10):64-9.
10
Copy, Paste, and Cloned Notes in Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中的复制、粘贴和克隆笔记。
Chest. 2014 Mar;145(3):632-638. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0886.

引用本文的文献

1
Noninterruptive tool to support provider malnutrition documentation and minimize documentation queries.支持医护人员进行营养不良记录并减少记录查询的非干扰性工具。
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 21;8(3):ooaf034. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf034. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Resident integration with inpatient clinical documentation improvement: a quality improvement project.住院医师整合入患者临床文档改善工作:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jun;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001300.
3
Measuring case severity: a novel tool for benchmarking and clinical documentation improvement.衡量病例严重程度:一种用于基准测试和临床文档改进的新工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 15;22(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07935-1.
4
Findings from the Health Information Management Section of the 2020 International Medical Informatics Association Yearbook.2020 年国际医学信息协会年鉴卫生信息管理科的研究结果。
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):87-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701999. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes for the obese hospital inpatient: An observational study.肥胖症住院患者的临床结局:一项观察性研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Mar 23;5:2050312117700065. doi: 10.1177/2050312117700065. eCollection 2017.
2
Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的定义。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):457-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6374.
3
New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.新的脓毒症标准:一项我们不应做出的改变。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
4
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
5
Comorbidity of obesity and pain in a general population: results from the Southern Pain Prevalence Study.普通人群中肥胖与疼痛的共病情况:南方疼痛患病率研究结果
J Pain. 2007 May;8(5):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
6
Increased length of hospital stay in underweight and overweight patients at hospital admission: a controlled population study.入院时体重过轻和超重患者住院时间延长:一项对照人群研究。
Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;24(1):133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.08.012.
7
Length of hospital stays among obese individuals.肥胖个体的住院时间。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Sep;94(9):1587-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.9.1587.
8
Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.脓毒症与器官衰竭的定义以及脓毒症创新疗法的使用指南。ACCP/SCCM共识会议委员会。美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会。
Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.