Pariseau-Legault Pierre
Rech Soins Infirm. 2018 Dec(135):38-47. doi: 10.3917/rsi.135.0038.
The scientific legitimacy of nursing research depends on its adherence to different scientific criteria. Despite the lack of consensus on predetermined criteria, reflexivity is widely discussed as a strategy to establish rigour in qualitative research. Unfortunately, with the exception of tools such as the reflexive journal, little is said about how reflexivity can be completed. Several recent studies suggest the relevance of autoethnography to support the reflexive approach of nurse researchers. Inspired by the findings of an autoethnography and a narrative literature review, this article examines how this approach can contribute to the reflexivity of the nurse researcher. Autoethnography seems particularly adapted to the professional and academic context in which many nurses evolve. As a reflective tool, autoethnography can promote the development of the researcher's self-awareness, provide analytical tools to help better understand the influence of previous experiences on the relationship to research and report on the transition between different professional identities. In order to contribute to the debate on the use of autoethnography in qualitative research, central elements to this approach are discussed.
护理研究的科学合理性取决于其对不同科学标准的遵循。尽管对于预先确定的标准缺乏共识,但反思性作为在定性研究中确立严谨性的一种策略得到了广泛讨论。不幸的是,除了反思性日志等工具外,关于如何完成反思性的讨论很少。最近的几项研究表明了自我民族志对于支持护士研究者反思性方法的相关性。受一项自我民族志研究结果和叙事性文献综述的启发,本文探讨了这种方法如何有助于护士研究者的反思性。自我民族志似乎特别适用于许多护士所处的专业和学术背景。作为一种反思工具,自我民族志可以促进研究者自我意识的发展,提供分析工具以帮助更好地理解以往经历对研究关系的影响,并报告不同专业身份之间的转变。为了推动关于在定性研究中使用自我民族志的辩论,本文讨论了这种方法的核心要素。