Cutcliffe John R
University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):136-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732302239416.
In this article, the author reconsiders reflexivity and attempts to examine some unresolved issues by drawing particular attention to the relationship between reflexivity and certain related phenomena/processes: the researcher's a priori knowledge, values, beliefs; empathy within qualitative research; the presence and influence of the researcher's tacit knowledge, and May's "magic" in method. Given the limitations of some reflexive activity identified in this article, the author introduces the case for greater intellectual entrepreneurship within the context of qualitative research. He suggests that excessive emphasis on reflexive activity might inhibit intellectual entrepreneurship. Wherein intellectual entrepreneurship implies a conscious and deliberate attempt on the part of academics to explore the world of ideas boldly; to take more risks in theory development and to move away from being timid researchers.
在本文中,作者重新审视了反思性,并试图通过特别关注反思性与某些相关现象/过程之间的关系来审视一些未解决的问题:研究者的先验知识、价值观、信念;定性研究中的同理心;研究者隐性知识的存在与影响,以及梅氏方法中的“魔力”。鉴于本文所指出的一些反思性活动的局限性,作者提出了在定性研究背景下进行更大程度知识创业的理由。他认为,过度强调反思性活动可能会抑制知识创业。其中,知识创业意味着学者有意识、有目的地大胆探索思想世界;在理论发展中承担更多风险,摆脱成为胆小的研究者。