• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童辅助沟通决策的重要因素是什么?最佳最差标度调查的证据。

What's important in AAC decision making for children? Evidence from a best-worst scaling survey.

机构信息

a Leeds Institute of Health Sciences , University of Leeds , Leeds , UK.

b Faculty of Health Psychology and Social Care , Manchester Metropolitan University , Manchester , UK.

出版信息

Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Jun;35(2):80-94. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1561750. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1080/07434618.2018.1561750
PMID:30767575
Abstract

The choice of which AAC device to provide for a child can have long lasting consequences, but little is known about the decision-making of AAC professionals who make recommendations in this context. A survey was conducted with AAC professionals using best-worst scaling methodology examining what characteristics of children and attributes of AAC devices are considered most important in decision-making. A total of 19 child characteristics and 18 device attributes were selected by the authors from lists generated from literature reviews and from focus groups with AAC professionals, people who use AAC, and other stakeholders. The characteristics and attributes were used to develop two best-worst scaling surveys that were administered to 93 AAC professionals based in the UK. The relative importance of characteristics/attributes was estimated using statistical modelling. Child characteristics related to language and communication, cognitive and learning abilities, and personality traits were generally found to be more important than physical features. Communication, language, and interface-related AAC device attributes were generally more important than hardware and physical attributes. Respondent demographics (e.g., experience, professional background) did not seem to influence the importance assigned to device characteristics or attributes. Findings may inform both future quantitative research into decision-making and efforts to improve decision-making in practice.

摘要

为孩子选择哪种 AAC 设备可能会产生长期影响,但对于在这种情况下做出建议的 AAC 专业人员的决策过程却知之甚少。本研究采用最佳最差标度法对 AAC 专业人员进行了一项调查,以了解在决策过程中,哪些儿童特征和 AAC 设备属性被认为是最重要的。作者从文献综述和与 AAC 专业人员、使用 AAC 的人员以及其他利益相关者的焦点小组中生成的列表中选择了 19 个儿童特征和 18 个设备属性。这些特征和属性被用于开发两项最佳最差标度调查,共对 93 名英国的 AAC 专业人员进行了调查。使用统计建模来估计特征/属性的相对重要性。与语言和沟通、认知和学习能力以及个性特征相关的儿童特征通常比身体特征更为重要。与通信、语言和界面相关的 AAC 设备属性通常比硬件和物理属性更为重要。受访者的人口统计学特征(例如经验、专业背景)似乎并未影响对设备特征或属性的重要性的评估。研究结果可能为未来的决策制定定量研究以及改善实践中的决策制定提供信息。

相似文献

1
What's important in AAC decision making for children? Evidence from a best-worst scaling survey.儿童辅助沟通决策的重要因素是什么?最佳最差标度调查的证据。
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Jun;35(2):80-94. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1561750. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Decision-making in communication aid recommendations in the UK: cultural and contextual influencers.英国助听设备推荐决策:文化和背景因素的影响。
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Sep;35(3):180-192. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2019.1599066. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
3
Professionals' decision-making in recommending communication aids in the UK: competing considerations.专业人士在英国推荐助听设备时的决策:相互竞争的考虑因素。
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Sep;35(3):167-179. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2019.1597384. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment.找到最佳匹配:使用离散选择实验考察英国增材和替代沟通专业人员的决策。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 1;9(11):e030274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274.
5
Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.纳入最佳最差标度调查的离散选择实验的属性选择。
Value Health. 2021 Apr;24(4):575-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.025. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
Attributes of communication aids as described by those supporting children and young people with AAC.支持使用辅助沟通的儿童和青少年的人群对沟通辅具的描述属性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 May;58(3):910-928. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12833. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
8
Teamwork in AAC: examining clinical perceptions.辅助沟通中的团队合作:临床观点研究
Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Mar;27(1):16-25. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.546809. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
9
Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.对语音输出通讯辅助设备设计的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):366-81. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12012. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Something for everybody? Assessing the suitability of AAC systems for children using stated preference methods.为所有人提供服务?使用陈述偏好法评估 AAC 系统对儿童的适用性。
Augment Altern Commun. 2023 Sep;39(3):157-169. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2023.2206582. Epub 2023 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The UK C-BiLLT: Validity and reliability of an online assessment of spoken language comprehension for children with severe motor disorders.英国儿童运动性语言理解在线评估(C-BiLLT):效度与信度
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70025. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70025.
2
Speech-language pathologists' practices in augmentative and alternative communication during early intervention.言语语言病理学家在早期干预中增强和替代沟通方面的实践。
Augment Altern Commun. 2022 Mar;38(1):41-52. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2022.2046853. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment.
找到最佳匹配:使用离散选择实验考察英国增材和替代沟通专业人员的决策。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 1;9(11):e030274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274.