Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;58(10):948-960. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
Decreased activation to print in the left ventral, dorsal, and anterior pathways has been implicated in readers with dyslexia (DRs) but also is characteristic for typical beginning readers. Because most studies have compared DRs with their age-matched peers, the observed results could represent a dyslexia phenotype or a developmental delay. This study aimed to disentangle reading and dyslexia effects using 2 control groups matched for age and skill and a longitudinal design.
Brain response for print was compared in DRs and typical readers (TRs) who, at the beginning of schooling (time point 1 [TP]; 6-7 years old), read on average 3 words per minute, as did DRs at TP1, but improved their reading to an average level, and advanced readers (ARs) who at TP1 read as well as DRs 2 years later (TP3; 8-9 years old). The TR and DR groups were tracked longitudinally to observe neurodevelopmental changes.
At TP1, DRs did not differ from TRs. Over time, only TRs developed a neural circuit for reading in the left inferior frontal and fusiform gyri. At TP3, DRs exhibited hypo-activation in these areas compared with age-matched (TRs at TP3) and reading-matched (ARs at TP1) controls. At TP3, TRs showed hypo-activation in the left frontal and bilateral ventral occipital regions compared with ARs, but these effects were nonoverlapping with DR hypo-activations and are partly explained by IQ.
Decreased activation of the left fusiform and inferior frontal gyri to print in DRs results from an atypical developmental trajectory of reading and cannot be explained solely by lower reading skills.
在阅读障碍者(DRs)中,左侧腹侧、背侧和前向通路的激活减少已被认为与阅读障碍有关,但也与典型的初学阅读者的特征有关。由于大多数研究将 DRs 与其年龄匹配的同龄人进行比较,因此观察到的结果可能代表阅读障碍表型或发育迟缓。本研究旨在使用 2 个年龄和技能匹配的对照组和纵向设计来区分阅读和阅读障碍的影响。
在开始上学时(时间点 1 [TP];6-7 岁),DRs 和典型阅读者(TRs)每分钟平均阅读 3 个单词,与 DRs 在 TP1 时一样,但 TRs 提高了阅读水平,达到了平均水平,而高级阅读者(ARs)在 TP1 时的阅读水平与 2 年后的 DRs 一样(TP3;8-9 岁)。TR 和 DR 组进行了纵向跟踪,以观察神经发育变化。
在 TP1 时,DRs 与 TRs 没有区别。随着时间的推移,只有 TRs 在左侧额下回和梭状回中发展出了阅读的神经回路。在 TP3 时,与年龄匹配的(TRs 在 TP3)和阅读匹配的(ARs 在 TP1)对照组相比,DRs 在这些区域表现出激活不足。在 TP3 时,与 ARs 相比,TRs 在左侧额叶和双侧腹侧枕叶区域表现出激活不足,但这些效应与 DRs 的激活不足不重叠,部分可以用智商来解释。
DRs 对印刷品的左侧梭状回和额下回的激活减少是由于阅读的非典型发展轨迹造成的,不能仅用较低的阅读技能来解释。