Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 May 30;173:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.117. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Chemical contaminants are known to accumulate in marine megafauna globally, but little is known about how this impacts animal health. In vitro assays offer an ethical, reproducible and cost-effective alternative to live animal toxicity testing on large, long-lived or threatened species, such as sea turtles. However, using a cell culture from a single animal raise the question of whether the toxicity observed adequately represents the toxicity in that species. This study examined variation in the cytotoxic response of primary skin fibroblasts established from seven green (Chelonia mydas) and five loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtles. Cell viability using resazurin dye was examined in response to exposure to five contaminants. The variation in cytotoxicity was generally low (within a factor of five) for both independent analyses of the same cell culture, and cell cultures from different individuals. This low within and between cell culture variation indicates that primary sea turtle cell cultures can provide a suitable approach to understanding toxicity in sea turtles. In addition, green and loggerhead turtle cells showed similar toxicity to the compounds tested, indicating that only subtle differences in chemical sensitivity may exist between sea turtle species. This study provides a framework for using species-specific cell cultures in future toxicological studies on sea turtles. Although in vivo studies are the gold standard for toxicological studies and species-specific risk assessments, the development of in vitro tools can provide important information when in vivo studies are not possible or practical. For large, endangered species such as sea turtles that are exposed to, and accumulate, a large number of contaminants, using validated cell cultures may facilitate the rapid assessment of chemical risk to these animals.
化学污染物在全球范围内被发现会在海洋巨型动物体内积累,但对于这如何影响动物健康知之甚少。体外检测为使用海龟等大型、长寿或受威胁物种的活体动物毒性测试提供了一种伦理、可重复且具有成本效益的替代方法。然而,从单个动物的细胞培养中提出了一个问题,即观察到的毒性是否充分代表该物种的毒性。本研究检查了来自 7 只绿海龟 (Chelonia mydas) 和 5 只红海龟 (Caretta caretta) 的原代皮肤成纤维细胞对五种污染物的细胞毒性反应的变化。使用 Resazurin 染料检测细胞活力对暴露于五种污染物的反应。对于同一细胞培养的两次独立分析以及来自不同个体的细胞培养,细胞毒性的变化通常很低(在五倍以内)。这种细胞培养内和细胞培养间的低变异性表明,原代海龟细胞培养可以为了解海龟的毒性提供一种合适的方法。此外,绿海龟和红海龟细胞对测试化合物表现出相似的毒性,表明海龟物种之间可能存在化学敏感性的细微差异。本研究为未来对海龟进行毒理学研究提供了使用物种特异性细胞培养的框架。尽管体内研究是毒理学研究和物种特异性风险评估的金标准,但体外工具的开发可以在无法进行或不实际进行体内研究时提供重要信息。对于大型濒危物种(如暴露于大量污染物并积累污染物的海龟),使用经过验证的细胞培养物可能有助于快速评估这些动物面临的化学风险。