Preclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Preclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Mar;122(3):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.018. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Global and intra-renal perfusion and oxygenation may be affected by the choice of anaesthetic. We compared the effects of isoflurane with those of propofol and fentanyl on renal blood flow (RBF) and intra-renal perfusion and oxygenation, and assessed how these were associated with renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA).
A renal artery flow probe and laser Doppler and oxygen-sensing probes were surgically implanted in the renal medulla and cortex in 20 Merino ewes. RSNA was measured in 12 additional ewes. We compared the effects of volatile or i.v. anaesthesia on global RBF, renal oxygen delivery (RDO), intra-renal perfusion, and RSNA with the non-anaesthetised state on postoperative day 3 as control reference.
Compared with a non-anaesthetised state, volatile anaesthesia reduced global RBF [-76 (82-68)%], RDO [-76 (83-71)%], and cortical [-68 (74-54)%] and medullary [-76 (84-72)%] perfusion. I.V. anaesthesia reduced RBF [-55 (67-38)%], RDO [-55 (65-44)%], and cortical [-27 (45-6)%] and medullary [-35 (48-30)%] perfusion, but to a lesser extent than volatile anaesthesia. Renal PO was not influenced by anaesthesia, whilst RSNA was elevated during volatile, but not during i.v. anaesthesia.
Volatile and i.v. general anaesthesia markedly reduced global RBF, RDO, and regional kidney perfusion. These effects were greater with volatile anaesthesia, and were paralleled by an increase in RSNA. Our findings suggest a neurogenic modulatory effect of anaesthetics on renal perfusion and oxygenation.
全身和肾内灌注和氧合可能会受到麻醉选择的影响。我们比较了异氟烷与丙泊酚和芬太尼对肾血流(RBF)、肾内灌注和氧合的影响,并评估了这些影响与肾交感神经活动(RSNA)的关系。
在 20 只美利奴羊的肾髓质和皮质中植入了肾动脉流量探头、激光多普勒和氧敏探头,并在另外 12 只羊中测量了 RSNA。我们比较了挥发性或静脉麻醉对全身 RBF、肾氧输送(RDO)、肾内灌注以及术后第 3 天非麻醉状态的影响,以作为对照参考。
与非麻醉状态相比,挥发性麻醉降低了全身 RBF[-76(82-68)%]、RDO[-76(83-71)%]以及皮质[-68(74-54)%]和髓质[-76(84-72)%]灌注。静脉麻醉降低了 RBF[-55(67-38)%]、RDO[-55(65-44)%]以及皮质[-27(45-6)%]和髓质[-35(48-30)%]灌注,但程度低于挥发性麻醉。肾氧分压不受麻醉影响,而 RSNA 在挥发性麻醉时升高,但在静脉麻醉时没有升高。
挥发性和静脉全身麻醉显著降低了全身 RBF、RDO 和肾局部灌注。挥发性麻醉的影响更大,同时伴有 RSNA 的增加。我们的发现表明麻醉对肾灌注和氧合具有神经调节作用。