• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入磨牙后区的微型种植体的失败率。

Failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar area.

作者信息

Azeem Muhammad, Saleem Muhammad Mudassar, Liaquat Ahmad, Ul Haq Arfan, Ul Hamid Waheed, Masood Mina

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Dental Section, Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.006
PMID:30770333
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anchorage reinforcement is an important issue in orthodontic treatment. There is a lack of evidence regarding the failure rate of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar (RM) area, therefore the purpose of this present study was to evaluate the failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the RM area and to evaluate the factors affecting their stability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of 102 patients (52 female, 55 male; mean age: 18.6years; SD: 5.2years) that had received 110 RM mini-implants for orthodontic treatment from 1.2.2012 to 1.6.2017 was conducted after IRB approval at the department of orthodontics. Clinical notes and photographic images of the patients were analysed to evaluate the dependent and independent variables. The primary outcome was mini-implant failure. Independent variables of patient related factors, mini-implant related factors, orthodontic related factors, surgical related factors, and maintenance-related factors were evaluated by logistic regression models for association to failure rates.

RESULTS

A 23.2% failure rate of mini-implants inserted in the RM area was observed. The patient's right side and inflammation were significantly associated with RM mini-implant failure. The odds ratios (relative risk) for mini-implant failure in the right side, and in mini-implants with inflammation around them were 0.166 and 0.188, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure rate for RM mini-implants were found to be 23.2%. To minimize RM mini-implant failure, clinicians should attempt to reduce inflammation around the mini-implants, especially for mini-implants placed on the right RM area.

摘要

目的

支抗加强是正畸治疗中的一个重要问题。关于在后磨牙(RM)区植入微型种植体的失败率,目前缺乏相关证据。因此,本研究的目的是评估RM区植入微型种植体的失败率,并评估影响其稳定性的因素。

材料与方法

本回顾性队列研究对2012年2月1日至2017年6月1日期间在正畸科接受IRB批准后接受110颗RM微型种植体正畸治疗的102例患者(52例女性,55例男性;平均年龄:18.6岁;标准差:5.2岁)进行。分析患者的临床记录和照片图像,以评估相关的自变量和因变量。主要观察指标为微型种植体失败情况。通过逻辑回归模型评估患者相关因素、微型种植体相关因素、正畸相关因素、手术相关因素和维护相关因素等自变量与失败率的相关性。

结果

观察到RM区植入的微型种植体失败率为23.2%。患者右侧及炎症与RM微型种植体失败显著相关。右侧微型种植体及周围有炎症的微型种植体失败的优势比(相对风险)分别为0.166和0.188。

结论

RM微型种植体的失败率为23.2%。为尽量减少RM微型种植体的失败,临床医生应尝试减少微型种植体周围的炎症,尤其是放置在右侧RM区的微型种植体。

相似文献

1
Failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar area.植入磨牙后区的微型种植体的失败率。
Int Orthod. 2019 Mar;17(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.三种不同正畸骨锚固系统失败率的回顾性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):768-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01405.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.与正畸支抗微型种植体稳定性相关的因素:台湾地区414例样本的研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015.
4
Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region.放置于颧下区域的微型种植体的失败率。
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0100-2. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants.正畸微种植体的生存分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.031.
6
Mini-screw implants (temporary anchorage devices): orthodontic and pre-prosthetic applications.微型螺钉种植体(临时锚固装置):正畸及修复前应用
J Orthod. 2007 Jun;34(2):80-94. doi: 10.1179/146531207225021987.
7
Quantitative assessment of orthodontic mini-implant displacement: the effect of initial force application.正畸微型种植体位移的定量评估:初始施力的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2010 Jan;41(1):59-66.
8
Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.皮质骨厚度和种植体植入扭矩对正畸微型种植体稳定性的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):779-84.
9
A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.一项关于正畸支抗微型种植体失败相关危险因素的前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):100-6.
10
Clinical study of temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic treatment--stability of micro/mini-screws and mini-plates: experience with 455 cases.正畸治疗中临时支抗装置的临床研究——微/迷你螺钉及迷你钛板的稳定性:455例经验
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51(3):151-63. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.51.151.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants hygiene protocols on subgingival bacterial load.正畸微型种植体卫生方案对龈下细菌负荷的比较评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 Mar 24;30(1):e2524108. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524108.oar. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者属性、植入物特性、手术技术和植入位置对年轻成年人正畸微型植入物成功的影响是什么?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Sep;36(9):1149-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Evaluation of Optimal Insertion Sites and Angles for Orthodontic Mini-Implants at the Anterior Nasal Spine Region Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
基于锥形束计算机断层扫描评估鼻前棘区域正畸微型种植体的最佳植入部位和角度
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 1;13(3):837. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030837.
4
Functionality testing of an innovative biomechanically optimized and surface-modified orthodontic mini-screw-a comparative study.一种创新的经生物力学优化和表面改性的正畸微螺钉的功能测试——一项对比研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 May;86(3):170-181. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00508-9. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
The Orthodontic Mini-Implants Failures Based on Patient Outcomes: Systematic Review.基于患者预后的正畸微型种植体失败情况:系统评价
Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):417-429. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772249. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Optimization Analysis of Two-Factor Continuous Variable between Thread Depth and Pitch of Microimplant under Toque Force.扭矩力作用下微种植体螺纹深度与螺距两因素连续变量的优化分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 20;2022:2119534. doi: 10.1155/2022/2119534. eCollection 2022.
7
A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.一项关于正畸中临时锚固装置的特征及成功率-失败率的范围综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):78. doi: 10.3390/dj10050078.
8
Ions release evaluation and corrosion of titanium mini-implant surface in response to orthokin, oral B and chlorhexidine mouthwashes.钛微种植体表面对正金因、口服维生素B和洗必泰漱口水的离子释放评估及腐蚀情况
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 May 24;18:32. eCollection 2021.