Product Performance Evaluation, L'Oreal USA, Clark, New Jersey.
Skin Res Technol. 2019 Jul;25(4):564-571. doi: 10.1111/srt.12687. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Despite a strong desire to quantify skin radiance in the field of cosmetics, there does not exist a robust method to characterize it. Classical shine that quantifies the specular reflection from skin has been commonly used as the metric to characterize radiance. However, it does not always correlate with the perceived radiance as there are many other parameters that inform radiance perception including spatial distribution of shine and color homogeneity.
In this work, we propose a novel method using fractal analysis to better characterize radiance by considering the spatial heterogeneity of pixel intensities as well as color evenness. A simulated image library (nine images) from very dull to very bright was created using bare face images of 20 panelists. Product images taken post-product usage were ranked along this library by finding the image in the library that most resembles the product image by our algorithm as well as experts. Additionally, classical shine and color measurements were made as benchmarks.
Our results confirm a strong correlation (R = 0.99) between the expert radiance rankings and the rankings by fractal dimension algorithm. The new algorithm offers an improved product differentiation compared with classical shine or color measurements.
Fractal dimension calculation offers higher sensitivity and resolution compared with other descriptors such as classical shine or color heterogeneity. In cases where the image rank is dominated by pixel intensities rather than color evenness, the image ranks resulting from calculating the fractal dimension is comparable with use of classical shine as the ranking parameter.
尽管在化妆品领域有强烈的意愿来量化皮肤光泽度,但目前还没有一种稳健的方法来对其进行描述。经典的光泽度测量方法可以量化皮肤的镜面反射,通常被用作描述光泽度的指标。然而,它并不总是与感知到的光泽度相关,因为还有许多其他参数可以影响光泽度的感知,包括光泽的空间分布和颜色均匀度。
在这项工作中,我们提出了一种使用分形分析的新方法,通过考虑像素强度的空间异质性和颜色均匀性来更好地描述光泽度。使用 20 位参与者的裸脸图像创建了一个从非常暗淡到非常明亮的模拟图像库(九个图像)。使用我们的算法以及专家的算法,对产品使用后的产品图像进行了排序,找出与产品图像最相似的图像。此外,还进行了经典光泽度和颜色测量作为基准。
我们的结果证实了专家光泽度排名与分形维算法排名之间存在很强的相关性(R = 0.99)。与经典光泽度或颜色测量相比,新算法提供了更高的产品区分度。
与经典光泽度或颜色不均匀度等其他描述符相比,分形维数的计算提供了更高的灵敏度和分辨率。在图像排名主要由像素强度而不是颜色均匀度决定的情况下,计算分形维数得出的图像排名与使用经典光泽度作为排名参数相当。