• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EURONIC 研究 20 年后的终末决策:德国、瑞士和奥地利新生儿科医生的自我报告实践、态度和治疗选择。

End-of-Life Decisions 20 Years after EURONIC: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices, Attitudes, and Treatment Choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, GFO Kliniken Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Neonatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2019 Apr;207:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064
PMID:30772016
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in attitudes of neonatologists regarding the care of extremely preterm infants and parental involvement over the last 20 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Internet-based survey (2016) involving 170 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany using the European Project on Parents' Information and Ethical Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care Units questionnaire (German edition) with minor modifications to the original survey from 1996 to 1997.

RESULTS

The 2016 survey included 104 respondents (52.5% response rate). In 2016, significantly more neonatologists reported having ever withheld intensive care treatment (99% vs 69%) and withdrawn mechanical ventilation (96% vs 61%) or life-saving drugs (99% vs 79%), compared with neonatologists surveyed in 1996-1997. Fewer considered limiting intensive care as a slippery slope possibly leading to abuse (18% vs 48%). In the situation of a deteriorating clinical condition despite all treatment, significantly more neonatologists would ask parental opinion about continuation of intensive care (49% vs 18%). In 2016, 21% of German neonatologists would resuscitate a hypothetical infant at the limits of viability, even against parental wishes.

CONCLUSIONS

Withholding or withdrawing intensive care for extremely preterm infants at the limits of viability with parental involvement has become more acceptable than it was 20 years ago. However, resuscitating extremely preterm infants against parental wishes remains an option for up to one-fifth of the responding neonatologists in this survey.

摘要

目的

评估过去 20 年来,新生儿科医生对极早产儿护理和家长参与的态度变化。

研究设计

互联网调查(2016 年),涉及奥地利、瑞士和德国的 170 个三级新生儿重症监护病房,使用欧洲父母信息和新生儿重症监护伦理决策项目问卷(德语版),对 1996 年至 1997 年的原始调查进行了轻微修改。

结果

2016 年的调查包括 104 名受访者(52.5%的回复率)。与 1996-1997 年接受调查的新生儿科医生相比,2016 年有更多的新生儿科医生报告曾拒绝提供重症治疗(99% vs 69%)和撤回机械通气(96% vs 61%)或救命药物(99% vs 79%)。认为限制重症治疗可能导致滥用的新生儿科医生较少(18% vs 48%)。在尽管所有治疗仍病情恶化的情况下,有更多的新生儿科医生会征求家长对继续重症治疗的意见(49% vs 18%)。2016 年,21%的德国新生儿科医生会在极限存活的情况下对假设的婴儿进行复苏,即使这违背了家长的意愿。

结论

在有家长参与的情况下,对极早产儿在极限存活的情况下拒绝或撤回重症治疗已经比 20 年前更容易被接受。然而,在这项调查中,仍有五分之一的新生儿科医生表示会违背家长的意愿对极早产儿进行复苏。

相似文献

1
End-of-Life Decisions 20 Years after EURONIC: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices, Attitudes, and Treatment Choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.EURONIC 研究 20 年后的终末决策:德国、瑞士和奥地利新生儿科医生的自我报告实践、态度和治疗选择。
J Pediatr. 2019 Apr;207:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.生存极限下的决策:新生儿科医生与护士之间不同的认知与观点
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z.
3
Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 20 years after the EURONIC study: A French survey.EURONIC研究近20年后的新生儿临终决策:一项法国调查。
Arch Pediatr. 2019 Sep;26(6):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
End-of-life decisions and practices for very preterm infants in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation of Belgium.比利时瓦隆-布鲁塞尔联邦区极早产儿的临终决策与实践
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1168-x.
5
Physicians' attitudes in relation to end-of-life decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: a national multicenter survey.新生儿重症监护病房中医生对临终决策的态度:一项全国多中心调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00555-6.
6
Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective.极早产儿的治疗选择:国际视角
J Pediatr. 2000 Nov;137(5):608-16. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.109144.
7
Bioethical Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices in Greek NICUs.新生儿重症监护中的生物伦理决策:希腊新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿科医生自我报告的实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):3465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103465.
8
Delivery room decision-making for extremely preterm infants in Sweden.瑞典极早产儿产房决策
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):1988-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1885.
9
End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group.新生儿重症监护中的临终决策:七个欧洲国家医生的自我报告实践。EURONIC研究小组。
Lancet. 2000 Jun 17;355(9221):2112-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02378-3.
10
The impact of neonatologists' religiosity and spirituality on health care delivery for high-risk neonates.新生儿科医生的宗教信仰和精神信仰对高危新生儿的医疗保健服务的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;13(10):1219-24. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0049.

引用本文的文献

1
Severe generalized edema in a premature neonate: A case report and literature review.一名早产儿的严重全身性水肿:病例报告及文献综述
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):e9341. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9341. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment (WWLST): an under recognised factor in the morbidity or mortality of periviable infants?-a narrative review.撤离和停止维持生命治疗(WWLST):极低出生体重儿发病或死亡中一个未得到充分认识的因素?——一篇叙述性综述
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Mar 27;13(3):459-473. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-468. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Public Attitudes Toward Ethics and Practices in End-of-Life Decision-Making for Neonates.
公众对新生儿末期决策制定中的伦理和实践的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353264. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53264.
4
Moral distress among neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units in Greece: a qualitative study.希腊新生儿重症监护病房新生儿科医生的道德困境:一项定性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03918-1.
5
Initiating technology dependence to sustain a child's life: a systematic review of reasons.启动技术依赖以维持儿童生命:原因的系统评价。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1068-1075. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107099. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.新生儿临终决策:希腊医生、助产士和护士在临床场景中的可能行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083938.
7
Development of a small baby unit to improve outcomes for the extremely premature infant.建立一个小型婴儿病房以改善极早产儿的预后。
J Perinatol. 2022 Feb;42(2):157-164. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-00984-0. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
8
Neonatal end-of-life decisions and ethical perspectives.新生儿临终决策与伦理视角。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Dec 5;13:19. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i19.4827. eCollection 2020.
9
Withdrawal of treatment in a pediatric intensive care unit at a Children's Hospital in China: a 10-year retrospective study.中国一家儿童医院儿科重症监护病房的治疗撤项:一项10年回顾性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00517-y.