• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义数字健康时代的同情心:范围综述议定书。

Defining compassion in the digital health age: protocol for a scoping review.

机构信息

UHN Digital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e026338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026338.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026338
PMID:30772865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6398782/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The notion of compassion and compassionate care is playing an increasingly important role in health professional education and in the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Digital contexts, however, are not considered in the conceptualisation of compassionate care, nor is there guidance on how compassionate care is to be exercised while using digital health technologies. The widespread diffusion of digital health technologies provides new contexts for compassionate care, with both opportunities for new forms and instantiations of compassion as well as new challenges. How compassion is both understood and enacted within this evolving, digital realm has not been synthesised.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review protocol follows Arksey and O'Malley's methodology to examine dimensions of compassionate professional practice when digital technologies are integrated into clinical care. Relevant peer-reviewed literature will be identified using a search strategy developed by medical librarians, which applies to six databases of medical, computer and information systems disciplines. Eligibility of articles will be determined using the two-stage screening process consisting of (1) title and abstract scan, and (2) full-text review. Screening, abstracting and charting will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer available for resolution when consensus is not achieved. In order to look at the range of current research in this area, extracted data will be thematically analysed and validated by content experts. Descriptive statistics will be calculated where necessary.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research ethics approval and consent to participate is not required for this scoping review. The results of the review will inform resource development and strategy for Associated Medical Services (AMS) Healthcare, a Canadian charitable organisation at the forefront of advancing research and leadership development in health and humanities, as part of the AMS Phoenix Project: A Call to Caring, particularly for digital professionalism frameworks so that they are inclusive of a compassion competency.

摘要

简介

同情和关爱护理的概念在卫生专业人员教育和提供高质量医疗保健方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,在同情护理的概念化中没有考虑数字环境,也没有关于在使用数字健康技术时如何实施同情护理的指导。数字健康技术的广泛传播为同情护理提供了新的环境,既有新形式和实例化同情的机会,也有新的挑战。在这个不断发展的数字领域中,同情是如何被理解和实施的,还没有被综合起来。

方法和分析

本范围综述协议遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法,研究当数字技术整合到临床护理中时,有同情心的专业实践的各个方面。将使用医学图书馆员开发的搜索策略来确定相关的同行评审文献,该策略适用于六个医学、计算机和信息系统学科的数据库。使用包括(1)标题和摘要扫描,以及(2)全文审查的两阶段筛选过程来确定文章的资格。筛选、摘要和图表将由两名独立的审查员进行,当无法达成共识时,第三名审查员可提供解决方案。为了研究该领域当前研究的范围,将对提取的数据进行主题分析,并由内容专家进行验证。在必要时,将计算描述性统计数据。

伦理和传播

本范围综述不需要研究伦理批准和参与同意。审查的结果将为加拿大慈善组织 Associated Medical Services (AMS) Healthcare 的资源开发和战略提供信息,该组织是在健康和人文科学领域推进研究和领导力发展的前沿组织,作为 AMS Phoenix Project 的一部分:关怀呼吁,特别是针对数字专业框架,以便它们包括同情能力。

相似文献

1
Defining compassion in the digital health age: protocol for a scoping review.定义数字健康时代的同情心:范围综述议定书。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e026338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026338.
2
Delivery of compassionate mental health care in a digital technology-driven age: protocol for a scoping review.在数字技术驱动的时代提供富有同情心的精神卫生保健:范围综述的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e027989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027989.
3
Sensor technology to monitor health, well-being and movement among healthcare personnel at workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol.用于监测医疗机构工作场所医护人员健康、福利和运动的传感器技术:系统范围界定综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e054408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054408.
4
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploring concepts of compassion in care home settings: a scoping review protocol.探讨养老院环境中关怀概念的研究:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 21;11(10):e055033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055033.
6
Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature.同情心:对医疗保健文献的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 19;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0080-0.
7
Compassionate nursing care and the use of digital health technologies: A scoping review.富有同情心的护理关怀与数字健康技术的应用:系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Mar;127:104161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104161. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
8
Scoping review protocol: education initiatives for medical psychiatry collaborative care.范围综述方案:医学精神病学协作护理的教育举措。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e015886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015886.
9
Delivery of Compassionate Mental Health Care in a Digital Technology-Driven Age: Scoping Review.数字技术驱动时代的共情式心理健康护理:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 6;22(3):e16263. doi: 10.2196/16263.
10
Patient's views of empathic and compassionate healthcare interactions: A scoping review.患者对共情和关爱的医疗互动的看法:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Dec;131:105957. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105957. Epub 2023 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Shaping the Future of Digital Health Education in Canada: Prioritizing Competencies for Health Care Professionals Using the Quintuple Aim.塑造加拿大数字健康教育的未来:利用“五重目标”确定医疗保健专业人员的能力优先事项。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Sep 8;11:e75904. doi: 10.2196/75904.
2
Technology Integration to Support Nurses in an "Inpatient Room of the Future": Qualitative Analysis.技术整合以支持护士在“未来住院病房”中的工作:定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e68689. doi: 10.2196/68689.
3
Exploring Compassionate Care in Virtual Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study.探索虚拟康复中的关怀护理:定性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 May 22;12:e59157. doi: 10.2196/59157.
4
From Paper to Pixels: Digital Transition of a Patient Decision Aid-A Pilot Study.从纸质到电子:患者决策辅助工具的数字化转型——一项试点研究
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Dec 24;3(1):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100190. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Compassionate care during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的人文关怀。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01827-x.
6
Impact of timing and format of patient decision aids for breast cancer patients on their involvement in and preparedness for decision making - the IMPACTT randomised controlled trial protocol.影响乳腺癌患者参与和决策准备的患者决策辅助工具的时机和形式 - IMPACTT 随机对照试验方案。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12086-z.
7
Providing compassionate care in a virtual context: Qualitative exploration of Canadian primary care nurses' experiences.在虚拟环境中提供关怀护理:对加拿大初级护理护士经历的定性探索。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 9;10:20552076231224072. doi: 10.1177/20552076231224072. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Finding connection "while everything is going to crap": experiences in Recovery Colleges during the COVID-19 pandemic.在“一切都变得糟糕透顶”之际寻找联系:新冠疫情期间康复学院的经历
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 7;9(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00489-4.
9
Building Compassionate Experience Through Compassionate Action: Qualitative Behavioral Analysis.通过富有同情心的行动构建富有同情心的体验:定性行为分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 31;7:e43981. doi: 10.2196/43981.
10
Understanding how virtual care has shifted primary care interactions and patient experience: A qualitative analysis.了解虚拟医疗如何改变初级医疗互动和患者体验:一项定性分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jan;31(1):73-81. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231167905. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Anticipating and Training the Physician of the Future: The Importance of Caring in an Age of Artificial Intelligence.预见和培养未来的医生:人工智能时代关怀的重要性。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1105-1106. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002175.
3
Compassionate collaborative care: an integrative review of quality indicators in end-of-life care.富有同情心的协作护理:终末期关怀质量指标的综合评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 1;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0246-4.
4
The Emerging Issue of Digital Empathy.数字同理心的新问题
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):58. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80458.
5
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Treat Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗失眠:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149139. eCollection 2016.
6
Defining competencies for the practice of telepsychiatry through an assessment of resident learning needs.通过评估住院医师的学习需求来界定远程精神病学实践的能力要求。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 26;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0529-0.
7
Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature.同情心:对医疗保健文献的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 19;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0080-0.
8
Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities.医生与患者之间的电子邮件通信:挑战与机遇综述。
Fam Pract. 2016 Apr;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv101. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health: Competency-based education, evaluation and implications.远程精神病学培训与电子健康框架:基于能力的教育、评估及影响
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):569-92. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1091292. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
10
Donabedian's structure-process-outcome quality of care model: Validation in an integrated trauma system.唐纳贝迪安的医疗服务质量结构-过程-结果模型:在综合创伤系统中的验证
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6):1168-75. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000663.