Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12086-z.
After curative surgery for early-stage breast cancer, patients face a decision on whether to undergo surgery alone or to receive one or more adjuvant treatments, which may lower the risk of recurrence. Variations in survival outcomes are often marginal but there are differences in the side effects and other features of the options that patients may value differently. Hence, the patient's values and preferences are critical in determining what option to choose. It is well-researched that the use of shared decision making and patient decision aids can support this choice in a discussion between patient and clinician. However, it is still to be investigated what impact the timing and format of the patient decision aid have on shared decision making outcomes. In this trial, we aim to investigate the impact of a digital pre-consult compared to a paper-based in-consult patient decision aid on patients' involvement in shared decision making, decisional conflict and preparedness to make a decision.
The study is a randomised controlled trial with 204 patients at two Danish oncology outpatient clinics. Eligible patients are newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and offered adjuvant treatments after curative surgery to lower the risk of recurrence. Participants will be randomised to receive either an in-consult paper-based patient decision aid or a pre-consult digital patient decision aid. Data collection includes patient and clinician-reported outcomes as well as observer-reported shared decision making based on audio recordings of the consultation. The primary outcome is the extent to which patients are engaged in a shared decision making process reported by the patient. Secondary aims include the length of consultation, preparation for decision making, preferred role in shared decision making and decisional conflict.
This study is the first known randomised, controlled trial comparing a digital, pre-consult patient decision aid to an identical paper-based, in-consult patient decision aid. It will contribute evidence on the impact of patient decision aids in terms of investigating if pre-consult digital patient decisions aids compared to in-consult paper-based decision aids support the cancer patients in being better prepared for decision making.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05573022).
早期乳腺癌患者在接受根治性手术后,需要在单独手术和接受一种或多种辅助治疗之间做出决策,这些治疗可能会降低复发风险。生存结果的差异通常很小,但患者可能会根据自己的价值观对不同治疗方案的副作用和其他特征进行评估。因此,患者的价值观和偏好对于确定选择哪种治疗方案至关重要。大量研究表明,采用共同决策和患者决策辅助工具可以在医患讨论中支持患者做出选择。然而,目前仍需要研究患者决策辅助工具的使用时间和形式对共同决策结果的影响。在这项试验中,我们旨在研究数字预咨询与纸质门诊咨询患者决策辅助工具相比,对患者参与共同决策、决策冲突和准备做出决策的影响。
这是一项在丹麦两家肿瘤门诊进行的随机对照试验,共纳入 204 名患者。入组患者均为新诊断的早期乳腺癌患者,在根治性手术后接受辅助治疗以降低复发风险。参与者将被随机分配接受门诊咨询纸质患者决策辅助工具或预咨询数字患者决策辅助工具。数据收集包括患者和临床医生报告的结果,以及基于咨询音频记录的观察员报告的共同决策。主要结局是患者报告的参与共同决策过程的程度。次要目标包括咨询时间、决策准备、共同决策中的偏好角色和决策冲突。
这是第一项已知的比较数字预咨询患者决策辅助工具和相同的纸质门诊咨询患者决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。它将提供关于患者决策辅助工具影响的证据,研究数字预咨询患者决策辅助工具与纸质门诊咨询决策辅助工具相比是否支持癌症患者更好地为决策做好准备。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05573022)。