Xie X Y, Jia S M, Sun Z H, Zhang Z Y
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University & Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Feb 18;51(1):75-79. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.014.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with different resolution settings in detecting the simulated external root resorption defects.
External root resorption defects were simulated in 51 human single rooted premolar teeth. Cavities simulating root resorption defects of 1 mm in diameter and 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.3 mm in depth were drilled in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of lingual surfaces of the teeth. In addition to the 51 locations as controls, a total of 102 cavities were obtained in the present study. Specimens were placed in a human dry mandible and scanned by ProMax 3D and DCT PRO CBCT with different resolution settings, respectively. The three-dimensional CBCT images were evaluated by two experienced observers. The data were analyzed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. ROC curves were generated and the area under ROC curve (Az) was employed to express the diagnostic accuracy.
The diagnostic accuracy (Az value) of ProMax 3D CBCT with high, normal and low resolution settings were 0.867, 0.703 and 0.665 (P < 0.05), respectively. Defects with depths of 0.2 mm and 0.3 mm were easier to be detected than those with depths of 0.1 mm (P < 0.05). The images obtained by high resolution mode scanning had obvious advantages in detecting smaller defects (depth 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm). The DCT PRO CBCT provided 4 resolution settings including normal quality + normal resolution, normal quality + high resolution, high quality + normal resolution and high quality + high resolution. The Az values for those 4 resolution settings were 0.527, 0.725, 0.743, and 0.794 (P < 0.05), respectively. Similar to ProMax 3D CBCT, the scanning mode with high resolution played a better role in detecting the defects with depth of 0.1 mm. Except for the scanning setting mode with normal quality + normal resolution, the other three modes could well be evaluated for the defects with depth of 0.2 mm and 0.3 mm.
It is concluded that the diagnostic ability for external root resorption of CBCT could be affected by resolution settings. Computer-aid imaging method can improve the CBCT diagnostic accuracy for external root resorption without increasing the radiation dose level during CBCT scanning.
评估不同分辨率设置的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检测模拟牙根外吸收缺损的诊断准确性。
在51颗人类单根前磨牙上模拟牙根外吸收缺损。在牙齿舌面的颈、中、根尖三分之一处钻出模拟直径1mm且深度分别为0.1mm、0.2mm和0.3mm的牙根吸收缺损的洞。除51个作为对照的部位外,本研究共获得102个洞。将标本置于人类干燥下颌骨中,分别用不同分辨率设置的ProMax 3D和DCT PRO CBCT进行扫描。由两名经验丰富的观察者对三维CBCT图像进行评估。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析对数据进行分析。生成ROC曲线,并用ROC曲线下面积(Az)表示诊断准确性。
ProMax 3D CBCT在高、正常和低分辨率设置下的诊断准确性(Az值)分别为0.867、0.703和0.665(P<0.05)。深度为0.2mm和0.3mm的缺损比深度为0.1mm的缺损更容易被检测到(P<0.05)。高分辨率模式扫描获得的图像在检测较小缺损(深度0.1mm和0.2mm)方面具有明显优势。DCT PRO CBCT提供4种分辨率设置,包括正常质量+正常分辨率、正常质量+高分辨率、高质量+正常分辨率和高质量+高分辨率。这4种分辨率设置的Az值分别为0.527、0.725、0.743和0.794(P<0.05)。与ProMax 3D CBCT类似,高分辨率扫描模式在检测深度为0.1mm的缺损方面发挥了更好的作用。除正常质量+正常分辨率的扫描设置模式外,其他三种模式对深度为0.2mm和0.3mm的缺损均可进行良好评估。
得出结论,CBCT对牙根外吸收的诊断能力可能受分辨率设置的影响。计算机辅助成像方法可在不增加CBCT扫描辐射剂量水平的情况下提高CBCT对牙根外吸收的诊断准确性。