• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在有或无玷污层的情况下,评估AH 26、BioRoot RCS和MTA Plus根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透深度和推出粘结强度。

Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer.

作者信息

Aktemur Türker Sevinç, Uzunoğlu Emel, Purali Nuhan

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Fall;12(4):294-298. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.046. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

DOI:10.15171/joddd.2018.046
PMID:30774797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6368950/
Abstract

This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall.

摘要

本研究比较了玷污层对各种根管封闭剂渗透深度和推出粘结强度的影响。总共90颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙被分为2组:保留玷污层组和去除玷污层组。然后根据所测试的封闭剂将牙根进一步分为3个亚组:AH 26、BioRoot RCS和MTA Plus。用牙胶进行根管充填,并将相关封闭剂与0.1%的罗丹明B混合。从每个牙根的中三分之一区域获取三个1毫米厚的切片。选择两个切片进行推出试验,其余切片用于计算牙本质小管渗透深度和百分比。当保留玷污层时,MTA Plus和BioRoot RCS的固位力高于AH 26(P<0.05)。当去除玷污层时,BioRoot RCS显示出最低的渗透深度(P<0.05)。根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透对其与根管壁的粘结影响有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f1/6368950/79383a34e969/joddd-12-294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f1/6368950/530336ce6159/joddd-12-294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f1/6368950/79383a34e969/joddd-12-294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f1/6368950/530336ce6159/joddd-12-294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f1/6368950/79383a34e969/joddd-12-294-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer.在有或无玷污层的情况下,评估AH 26、BioRoot RCS和MTA Plus根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透深度和推出粘结强度。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Fall;12(4):294-298. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.046. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Evaluation of push-out bond strength, dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern of bio-ceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评价生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的推出强度、牙本质小管渗透和粘结模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294076. eCollection 2023.
3
Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.氢氧化钙对 2 种不同根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials.使用涂层核心材料时不同根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度和牙本质小管渗透情况。
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 May;41(2):114-20. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
The effect of smear layer on the push-out bond strength of root canal calcium silicate cements.玷污层对根管硅酸钙水泥的推出强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2013 Jul;29(7):797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,硅酸钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透能力:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Feb 11;12(3):531. doi: 10.3390/ma12030531.
7
Debunking the Concept of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers: Sealer Staining with Rhodamine B Fluorescent Dye Is an Inadequate Method.揭穿根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透概念:用罗丹明B荧光染料进行封闭剂染色是一种不充分的方法。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;14(12):3211. doi: 10.3390/ma14123211.
8
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
The push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的推出强度。
Head Face Med. 2018 Aug 20;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-018-0170-8.
10
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation the impact of access cavity design and activation of calcium silicate-based sealer with EDDY and XP-Endo Finisher on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.评估窝洞设计以及使用EDDY和XP-Endo Finisher激活硅酸钙类封闭剂对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Jul 26;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00530-9.
2
Efficacy of root-end filling techniques using premixed putty type bioceramic cements: an ex vivo study.使用预混糊剂型生物陶瓷水泥进行根管充填技术的疗效:一项离体研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 8;28(7):365. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05759-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of chitosan nanoparticle, QMix, and EDTA on TotalFill BC sealers' dentinal tubule penetration: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.壳聚糖纳米粒子、QMix 和 EDTA 对 TotalFill BC 根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透性的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0359-0. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods.不同充填方法下硅酸钙类根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透情况
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials.
Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on the Pushout Bond Strength of Resin-Based and Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.
光动力疗法对树脂基和硅酸钙基根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Sep 10;14:e33. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2023.33. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluation of push-out bond strength, dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern of bio-ceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评价生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的推出强度、牙本质小管渗透和粘结模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294076. eCollection 2023.
5
Influence of long -term thermal cycling and masticatory loading simulation on bond strength of roots filled with epoxy resin and calcium silicate based sealers.长期热循环和咀嚼负荷模拟对环氧树脂和硅酸钙基封闭剂填充根的粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03377-1.
6
Evaluation of bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of the bioceramics pulp dressing materials: an invitro study.评价生物陶瓷牙髓覆盖材料的细菌渗漏和边缘适应性:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 8;23(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03129-1.
7
Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透——体外研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;16(7):2734. doi: 10.3390/ma16072734.
8
Dislodgment Resistance, Adhesive Pattern, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Novel Experimental Algin Biopolymer-Incorporated Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer.新型含藻酸盐生物聚合物的生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的抗移位性、黏附模式及牙本质小管渗透情况
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;15(5):1317. doi: 10.3390/polym15051317.
9
Dentin Sealing of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers in Root Canal Retreatment: A Confocal Laser Microscopy Study.根管再治疗中基于硅酸钙封闭剂的牙本质封闭:共聚焦激光显微镜研究
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Aug 4;13(3):114. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030114.
10
In Vitro Comparison of the Wettability of a Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer on Dentin With and Without Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Irradiation.掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光照射与未照射情况下生物陶瓷根管封闭剂在牙本质上润湿性的体外比较
Cureus. 2022 Mar 31;14(3):e23715. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23715. eCollection 2022 Mar.
使用涂层核心材料时不同根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度和牙本质小管渗透情况。
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 May;41(2):114-20. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.硅酸三钙封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Dislodgement resistance of calcium silicate-based materials from root canals with varying thickness of dentine.不同牙本质厚度根管中硅酸钙基材料的抗脱位性
Int Endod J. 2016 Dec;49(12):1188-1193. doi: 10.1111/iej.12573. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
7
Bioactivity of a Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Cement (BioRoot RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells In Vitro.一种硅酸钙基根管充填粘固剂(BioRoot RCS)的生物活性:体外与人牙周膜细胞的相互作用
J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study.存在或不存在玷污层时封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1627-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 May 10.
9
Apical microleakage of different root canal sealers after use of maleic acid and EDTA as final irrigants.使用马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸作为最终冲洗剂后不同根管封闭剂的根尖微渗漏
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
Push-out bond strength of gutta-percha with a new bioceramic sealer in the presence or absence of smear layer.在有或无玷污层的情况下,新型生物陶瓷封闭剂与牙胶尖的推出粘结强度。
Aust Endod J. 2013 Dec;39(3):102-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2011.00310.x. Epub 2011 May 29.