• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测呼吸道病毒感染的Allplex呼吸道检测试剂盒1、2和3的性能评估

Performance Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, and 3 for the Detection of Respiratory Viral Infection.

作者信息

Lee Jae Hee, Lee Jong Ho

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2019 Jan 1;65(1). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180730.

DOI:10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180730
PMID:30775899
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, and 3 (Allplex; Seegene, Republic of Korea) is a one-step real-time reverse transcription-PCR method based on the multiple detection temperature (MuDT) technology for the detection of respiratory viral infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Allplex assay by comparing it with that of the Anyplex II RV16 detection kit (Anyplex; Seegene), a multiplex real-time PCR assay based on the tagging oligonucleotide cleavage and extension technology.

METHODS

A total of 400 clinical respiratory specimens that were previously tested by the Anyplex assay (300 samples that revealed positive results, and 100 samples that revealed negative results) were analyzed using the Allplex assay.

RESULTS

After comparing both assays for detecting each virus, the range of positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and kappa values were found to be 91.7% to 100%, 94.1% to 100%, and 0.659 to 1.000, respectively. The uniplex PCR and sequencing for the samples with discrepant results revealed that a majority of the results were concordant with the results from the Allplex assay. In addition, the Allplex assay was superior in detecting multiple viruses.

CONCLUSIONS

The Allplex assay produces results comparable to those of the Anyplex assay. Thus, the Allplex assay can be proposed as a rapid and accurate method for detecting respiratory viruses, especially for the detection of multiple viral infections.

摘要

背景

Allplex呼吸道检测试剂盒1、2和3(Allplex;韩国Seegene公司)是一种基于多重检测温度(MuDT)技术的一步法实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)方法,用于检测呼吸道病毒感染。在本研究中,我们通过将Allplex检测法与Anyplex II RV16检测试剂盒(Anyplex;韩国Seegene公司)进行比较,评估了Allplex检测法的性能,Anyplex II RV16检测试剂盒是一种基于标记寡核苷酸切割和延伸技术的多重实时PCR检测法。

方法

使用Allplex检测法对400份先前经Anyplex检测法检测过的临床呼吸道标本进行分析(300份检测结果为阳性的样本和100份检测结果为阴性的样本)。

结果

在比较两种检测法对每种病毒的检测结果后,发现阳性一致率、阴性一致率和kappa值的范围分别为91.7%至100%、94.1%至100%和0.659至1.000。对结果不一致的样本进行单重PCR和测序显示,大多数结果与Allplex检测法的结果一致。此外,Allplex检测法在检测多种病毒方面更具优势。

结论

Allplex检测法产生的结果与Anyplex检测法相当。因此,Allplex检测法可被认为是一种快速、准确的呼吸道病毒检测方法,尤其是用于检测多种病毒感染。

相似文献

1
Performance Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, and 3 for the Detection of Respiratory Viral Infection.用于检测呼吸道病毒感染的Allplex呼吸道检测试剂盒1、2和3的性能评估
Clin Lab. 2019 Jan 1;65(1). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180730.
2
Performance Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, and 3 for Detection of Respiratory Viruses and Influenza A Virus Subtypes.用于检测呼吸道病毒和甲型流感病毒亚型的Allplex呼吸道检测板1、2和3的性能评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Feb;55(2):479-484. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02045-16. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
3
Comparison of the Anyplex(TM) II RV16 and Seeplex(®) RV12 ACE assays for the detection of respiratory viruses.用于检测呼吸道病毒的Anyplex™ II RV16和Seeplex® RV12 ACE检测方法的比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;79(4):419-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
4
Comparison of Anyplex II RV16 with the xTAG respiratory viral panel and Seeplex RV15 for detection of respiratory viruses.Anyplex II RV16 与 xTAG 呼吸道病毒 panel 及 Seeplex RV15 检测呼吸道病毒的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Apr;51(4):1137-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02958-12. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of three multiplex PCR assays for detection of respiratory viruses: Anyplex II RV16, AdvanSure RV, and Real-Q RV.三种用于检测呼吸道病毒的多重PCR检测方法的比较:Anyplex II RV16、AdvanSure RV和Real-Q RV。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22230. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panel 1/2/3 Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses with Influenza A Virus subtyping.评估 Allplex 呼吸道Panel 1/2/3 多重实时 PCR 检测试剂盒用于流感 A 病毒亚型检测的呼吸道病毒。
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jan;38(1):46-50. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.46.
7
Evaluation of three commercial multiplex assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections.三种用于检测呼吸道病毒感染的商业多重检测方法的评估。
J Virol Methods. 2017 Oct;248:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
8
Comparison of the fast track diagnostics respiratory 21 and Seegene Allplex multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of respiratory viruses.快速诊断呼吸道21检测法与Seegene全谱多重聚合酶链反应检测法在呼吸道病毒检测中的比较。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2017 Apr;74(2):85-89. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2017.1278885. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Comparison of two multiplex PCR assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections.两种用于检测呼吸道病毒感染的多重PCR检测方法的比较。
Clin Respir J. 2014 Oct;8(4):391-6. doi: 10.1111/crj.12083. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
10
Evaluation of the Seegene Allplex™ RV master assay for one-step simultaneous detection of eight respiratory viruses in nasopharyngeal specimens.评估Seegene Allplex™ RV主检测法用于鼻咽标本中八种呼吸道病毒的一步法同时检测。
J Virol Methods. 2025 Jan;331:115042. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.115042. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological characteristics of five non-COVID respiratory viruses among 37,139 all-age patients during 2018 - 2023 in Weifang, China: a cross-sectional study.2018 年至 2023 年期间中国潍坊 37139 例全年龄段患者中五种非 COVID 呼吸道病毒的流行病学特征:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):1324. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10212-7.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panels 1, 2, 3, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel for the Detection of Respiratory Infections.Allplex呼吸道检测板1、2、3与BioFire FilmArray呼吸道检测板用于检测呼吸道感染的比较评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;12(1):9. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010009.
3
Multiplex Platforms for the Identification of Respiratory Pathogens: Are They Useful in Pediatric Clinical Practice?
用于呼吸道病原体鉴定的多重平台:它们在儿科临床实践中有用吗?
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Jun 4;9:196. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00196. eCollection 2019.