Instituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Apr;127:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Several behavioral studies have reported a detrimental effect of emotion on reasoning tasks, either when the content of the reasoning and/or the mood state of the individual are emotionally loaded. However, the neural mechanisms involved in this phenomena remain largely unexplored. In an event-related potentials (ERPs) study, we examined the consequences of an induced mood over the electrophysiological signals obtained while processing logical and illogical categorical conclusions. Prior to performing a syllogism reading task, we aimed to induce, by using short film clips, high arousal negative and positive moods and neutral affective states to participants in three separate recording sessions. Our mood induction procedure was only successful at inducing a highly arousing negative state. Behaviorally, participants committed more errors overall while judging the invalidity versus the validity of illogical and logical conclusions, respectively, but no influences from mood state emerged at this logical validity task. Electrophysiologically and overall a negative going N400 deflection was larger for illogical relative to logical conclusions in a parietal region between 300 and 420 ms. However, further analysis revealed that the logical conclusions were only more expected (smaller N400 amplitudes) in the negative relative to the neutral and the positive sessions, providing support to theoretical views that posit that a more analytic reasoning style might be implemented under a negative mood state. These results provide further electrophysiological evidence of the influence of mood on other cognitive processes, particularly on the anticipation and processing of logical conclusions during online reasoning tasks.
几项行为研究报告称,情绪对推理任务有不利影响,无论是推理的内容还是个体的情绪状态带有情绪色彩。然而,这一现象所涉及的神经机制在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,我们研究了在处理逻辑和不合逻辑的范畴结论时,情绪诱导对电生理信号的影响。在进行三段论阅读任务之前,我们旨在通过使用短片剪辑,在三个单独的记录会话中分别向参与者诱导高度唤醒的消极和积极情绪以及中性情绪状态。我们的情绪诱导程序仅成功地诱导出了高度唤醒的消极状态。从行为上看,参与者在判断不合逻辑和逻辑结论的无效性时,总体上犯了更多的错误,但在这个逻辑有效性任务中,情绪状态没有产生影响。从电生理和总体上看,在顶叶区域(300 到 420ms 之间),相对于逻辑结论,不逻辑结论的负向 N400 偏转更大。然而,进一步的分析表明,只有在消极情绪相对于中性和积极情绪时,逻辑结论才更被期待(N400 振幅更小),这为理论观点提供了支持,即更分析性的推理风格可能在消极情绪状态下实施。这些结果为情绪对其他认知过程的影响提供了进一步的电生理证据,特别是在在线推理任务中对逻辑结论的预期和处理方面。