Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Thromb Res. 2019 Apr;176:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
INTRODUCTION: Blood loss in Total Joint Arthroplasty can be significant and often under-estimated. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of different routes of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration in reducing blood transfusion after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim is to find the safest and most efficacious route and dose of TXA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and OpenGrey were systemically searched for randomised controlled trials investigating the efficacy and/or safety of TXA for THA and/or TKA. Network meta-analysis, comparing the number of transfusion and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among different interventions, was performed using a multivariate meta-regression model with random-effects, adopting a frequentist approach. RESULTS: 211 publications (20,639 individuals) were included. For outcome of transfusion, all interventions showed significantly lower transfusion rates compared to placebo. When compared to placebo, TXA via intra-venous and topical showed statistically significant lowest risk ratio (RR = 0.11, 95CI: 0.03, 0.41). For safety, TXA via topical showed relatively lowest risk ratio (RR = 0.75, 95CI 0.44, 1.30). TXA via topical and intra-articular had the highest but statistically insignificant RR (RR = 1.10, 95%CI: 0.51, 2.38). Therefore, current studies did not reveal any significant safety issue in using TXA. CONCLUSION: All forms of TXA administration showed significantly lower transfusion rate compared to control. There is a trend towards better efficacy with intra-venous and topical. In patients with higher risk of thrombosis, physicians may consider topical alone for its best safety profile.
简介:全关节置换术中的失血可能很大,且常常被低估。本研究旨在探讨不同氨甲环酸(TXA)给药途径在减少全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后输血的安全性和有效性。次要目标是找到最安全、最有效的 TXA 给药途径和剂量。
材料与方法:系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施和 OpenGrey 中的随机对照试验,以调查 TXA 对 THA 和/或 TKA 的疗效和/或安全性。采用多变量meta 回归模型(随机效应)进行网络荟萃分析,比较不同干预措施之间的输血和深静脉血栓形成(DVT)数量,采用频率主义方法。
结果:共纳入 211 篇文献(20639 人)。在输血结局方面,与安慰剂相比,所有干预措施的输血率均显著降低。与安慰剂相比,静脉内和局部应用 TXA 显示出统计学上显著的最低风险比(RR=0.11,95%CI:0.03,0.41)。在安全性方面,局部应用 TXA 显示出相对最低的风险比(RR=0.75,95%CI 0.44,1.30)。局部和关节内应用 TXA 的 RR 最高,但无统计学意义(RR=1.10,95%CI:0.51,2.38)。因此,目前的研究并未发现使用 TXA 存在任何显著的安全性问题。
结论:与对照组相比,所有形式的 TXA 给药均显著降低了输血率。静脉内和局部给药的效果有改善趋势。对于血栓形成风险较高的患者,考虑到其最佳安全性,医生可能会单独使用局部 TXA。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-11-13
Arthroplast Today. 2024-3-2